The BBC mentions a fight over the criteria to ban books in Miami schools:
Judge Gold gave the school until the end of the day to put the books it had removed from the shelves back in the library.
Juan Amador Rodriguez, the parent who had complained about the book, said he was surprised and disappointed at the judge’s decision.
“The book has errors. It has errors of omission, omission about the reality of the country,” Mr Amador said.
Ok, forget about the subject for a second. Let’s not say whether it is a bible, a cookbook or a book about horses they’re fighting over. Is “errors of omission” the standard by which books should be banned? That seems to me to be the weakest claim of all, since omission can easily be remedied by more reading or even discussion, unless those materials are also banned under the same principle. Ridiculed or criticized, perhaps, but banned?
Ok, we’re talking about a children’s book (in a school library), right? This isn’t an encyclopedia, an official record, or some other important account of events and reality of a country. Is the content harmful? Unlikely. I mean can you imagine if childrens books couldn’t be published with any omissions. What would “Cat in the Hat” look like?
Three cheers to the judge for barring the ban on books. Here‘s more detail from the American Libraries site:
The complainant is “himself an immigrant from Cuba,� [Miami-Dade County Public Schools spokesperson Joseph] Garcia told the AP, “and doesn’t feel the book is a fair and accurate representation of life in Cuba under the current regime.� A Visit to Cuba remains unchallenged in 32 other school libraries in the district.
Don’t get me wrong, I think that there does exist a line that should be monitored to block truly harmful or offensive material, but as far as I can tell this is a case about a book that has an incorrect depiction. Facts could be presented to support that in the classroom, not the courts. Perhaps changes could be suggested to the publisher. That means to me that a case might be made for a replacement or a supplement to offset the errors, and there is no need for an outright ban on the material.
Thus, it is sad that a school board did not stand up for the hallmarks of free society when challenged! The trial is still to be heard. I wonder if there is a real danger is that a lobby group could try to oust the judge from his seat and find a replacement that will no longer support freedom of speech (e.g. pressure for an appointment of a puppet to strike down the notion that they or their children should allow other perspectives to be heard). This would be a horrible state of affairs as intelligent dialogue and balance would be lost in the schools…
The book can be found here, in case you want to review for yourself and figure out why someone would be offended by the content.
How do some people in Cuba get from place to place? What kinds of fruits grow in Cuba? Which spiky plant do some Cubans eat as a vegetable? Learn the answers to these questions and more when you read ‘A Visit to: Cuba.’ See the famous sites. Travel over the land. Join in the celebrations. Find out what Cuban children learn in school and what they might do when they are older. Se[e] if they play the same sports as you or wear the same kind of clothes. Learn some words in Spanish!
I couldn’t help but notice they omitted an “e” from “See”. That’s it, ban it!