Category Archives: Energy

AC72 wing design

We are only a couple months away from the giant America’s Cup catamaran wings being launched. A team led by American Paul Cayard already has theirs on sea trials. Blue Planet Times explains there was a lot of effort put into design regulation.

The box rule governing the AC72 is one big sandbox, so the engineers get to play. Oracle Racing Team Coordinator Ian Burns explains: “I was involved in writing the rule for the AC72s, and when we addressed the wing, we started with a complicated rule, to limit what a designer could do. We added more and more pieces as we thought of more and more outcomes, and we came to a point where it was so complicated—and it was still going to be hard to control, because the more rules you write the more loopholes you create – that we reverted to a simple principle. Limit the area very accurately, and make it a game of efficiency.”

Here’s the basic box rule for the AC72:

Hull Length: 22m (72.18 feet)
Maximum Beam: 14m (45.93 feet)
Wing Height: 40m (131.23 feet)
Maximum Draft: 4.4m (14.44 feet)
Displacement: 5900kg (13007 pounds)
Wing Area: 260 sqm (2798 square feet
Jib Area: 100 sqm (1076 square feet)
Gennaker Area: 400 sqm (4305 square feet)
Crew: 11@92kg/per (203 pounds)

Cayard’s description of the latest engineering challenges to make those numbers work is not your usual scuttlebutt.

“We have 38 hydraulic cylinders. We want to avoid running hydraulic piping to each of them, because that would be heavy, so we have electrovalves embedded in the wing to actuate the hydraulics. But if you had two wires, positive and negative, running to each electrovalve, your wing would look like a PG&E substation, and that’s heavy too, so we use a CAN-bus [controlled area network] with far fewer wires. Still, it’s incredibly complex.

“We wind up with lot of hydraulics,” Cayard says, “and the America’s Cup rules don’t allow stored power, so two of our eleven guys—we think, two—will be grinding a primary winch all the race long. Not to trim, but to maintain pressure in the hydraulic tank so that any time someone wants to open a hydraulic valve to trim the wing, there will be pressure to make that happen.”

Ok, so there’s thousands of hours in design of these wings but there’s something deeply ironic about a 72 foot catamaran with a 130 foot wing that can sail faster than the wind but can’t generate enough power to manage hydraulics without two crew constantly grinding a winch. It seems like a legacy mindset. A big part of the old America’s Cup boats was to be staffed with powerful yet heavy crew who can muscle the boat around. These boats surely call for lighter more nimble crew. What if someone even figured out a way to efficiently use the wind to generate power…?

Perhaps Luca Devoti said it best. These boats are pure racing machines that have power to burn. They should have no shortage of energy at their disposal, or they may even have a reason for absorbing excess.

You have to change completely your way of thinking: the boat is sailing from the moment the wing comes out of the shed because the wing can fly away at any moment.

The trick, as explained in the following video, is to make the wing secure yet light; to keep it as uncomplicated as possible to reduce risk and reduce response time. Most of all, it sounds like the designers want to hurry-up and make up for 20 years of lost time by borrowing technology and efficiency study lessons from the A-Class and C-Class catamaran fleets:

The Power of Cracking Passwords

Ivan Golubev’s blog points out that power supply and heat dissipation can impact the speed of brute forcing passwords with graphics cards.

Apparently lowering GPU core frequency resulting in “closer to estimations” performance. My first guess was that there is internal throttling in 6990 and so overheating causing performance drop. I’ve even posted in official forum about this but some more experiments reveals that I wasn’t totally true. Answer was pretty simple:

[…]

Yep, by default it isn’t enough power provided for 6990 to make it work with 100% performance

[…]

…make sure you have proper cooling and PSU as looks like official 375W TDP can easily became 450W and this means A LOT of heat you’re need to deal with somehow.

The Radeon HD 6990 graphics cards have dropped to under $400, which is very tempting, but only for air-cooled. So the cost of reaching peak brute-force performance levels of 10 billion passwords per second with ighashgpu really must be measured in terms of cost of liquid cooling and clean supply of power (around $4,000 for a complete system). It’s a nice example of how security is tied to energy and efficiency. Golubev actually provides a spreadsheet of performance per dollar but it doesn’t mention environmental factors that support peak performance.

To put this all in perspective, a strong mixed upper-lower case alphanumeric with symbols password that is 8 digits long on a Microsoft OS could take around 20 days to crack for less than $5,000. Since password change cycles are usually 90 days…

Co-tenancy risk for Polar Bears

I get asked all the time whether it is “safe enough” to run different levels of security on the same physical hardware if you have a hypervisor separating the load. The answer is, of course, it depends. We have complex control models and detailed explanations that prove hypervisors can reach even the highest (e.g. FISMA High) level of measurement. But the issue is really not about controls available, it is about management decisions and configuration.

To put co-tenancy in a broader context, consider the latest decision by the Obama administration regarding the obvious plight of Polar Bears. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service today published in the Federal Register a proposed rule and draft environmental study. This new draft is meant to replace a Bush administration 2008 attempt at a rule that was voided in 2011 by federal court. The public has two months to comment and already there is a clear backlash based on broad risks of co-tenancy.

A proposed rule aimed at protecting endangered polar bears doesn’t even mention how the federal government will address global warming, which is seen as the primary threat to the Arctic predators.

[…]

Both the current proposal and the previous Bush rule exclude activities occurring outside the range of polar bears — such as the greenhouse gas emissions of industrial polluters like coal plants — from regulations that could help stop the bear’s extinction.

Unfortunately, it seems bears have no service level agreement with their provider that they can use for leverage against the harm that is coming from their neighbours. The administration also presents an interesting argument against controls that seems completely upside-down.

In the new environmental assessment, Fish and Wildlife managers argued that not issuing an exemption for harm to polar bears outside the Arctic would lead to a plethora of citizens’ lawsuits which, the agency said, had little chance of prevailing. Such suits would take up agency staffers’ time that could better be spent helping polar bears, they said.

Parking Space Corruption

I often refer to a USC economics study of parking behaviour when speaking in private on correlation and insider risk but apparently I have not yet mentioned it on my blog, so here it is: “Cultures of Corruption: Evidence from Diplomatic Parking Tickets

Corruption is believed to be a major factor impeding economic development, but the importance of legal enforcement versus cultural norms in controlling corruption is poorly understood. To disentangle these two factors, we exploit a natural experiment, the stationing of thousands of diplomats from around the world in New York City. Diplomatic immunity means there was essentially zero legal enforcement of diplomatic parking violations, allowing us to examine the role of cultural norms alone. This generates a revealed preference measure of corruption based on real-world behavior for government officials all acting in the same setting. We find tremendous persistence in corruption norms: diplomats from high corruption countries (based on existing survey-based indices) have significantly more parking violations.