Category Archives: History

Japanese attack after Pearl Harbor was thrown off by change to American code

The WarZone has a back-and-forth analysis of a second raid on Pearl Harbor, by long-range “flying boat” bombers from Japan, that leaves the reader (or maybe it’s just me) scratching their head.

They had been able to intercept and read U.S. weather reports that would have helped find a window with clear weather over Pearl Harbor. A change in the American codes cut them off from that information and meant the H8Ks were now going to be flying through clouds and rain. Regardless of the U.S. intel misstep, at a distance of around 200 miles from Hawaii, the flying boats were picked up by two U.S. radar stations in Hawaii, and P-40 fighters were scrambled from the island to intercept them. Though they had no airborne radar of their own to warn them of this response, the Japanese intruders were cloaked by darkness and thick clouds and managed to slip through the defenses, arriving over Oahu at around 15,000 feet early in the morning of March 4. Although the night and poor weather offered the IJN aircraft protection, the downside was that their crews now had to find their targets visually.

Open questions:

  • What rain? Weather records for the month of May 1942 say “total of 0.01 inches of rain”.
  • If darkness and clouds were credited with mission success on long-range approach, was that a necessary sacrifice of accuracy in the attack? I mean did the Japanese want cloud cover more than not?
  • Even in clear weather Oahu was in total darkness/lockdown after December 1941. What visuals would they have relied upon?
  • Why couldn’t the Japanese predict weather on their own, given their battery of weather stations? They were self-timing with March 4, 1942 because full moon, no?

Lots to delve into, but primarily it is interesting that the alleged impact of that American code change was that the Japanese no longer could tell the weather. That doesn’t ring quite right.

I’m not saying weather wasn’t a decisive factor. Obviously it was, both in providing cover for an approach and clarity in an attack, as described here a month later:

Source: Fuller, J. (2015). Thor’s Legions: Weather Support to the U.S. Air Force and Army, 1937-1987. Germany: American Meteorological Society, p. 179

Perhaps even more to the point, the whole reason codes changed after December 1941 was because America’s Office of Censorship along with the US Weather Bureau strongly believed any radio broadcast of weather was a serious national security issue; for example, August 1942:

…a dense fog covered Chicago. Visibility was so low that the play-to-play commentator on the radio was almost completely unaware of the action taking place on the pitch. He struggled to transmit the match, mistaking names of the players and barely keeping the score, but he never once mentioned the reason for his handicap. The word “fog” was never uttered in the transmission and the announcer’s struggle during the live broadcast must have caused an avalanche of laughter among the listeners.

Clearly (pun not intended) weather was important data for mission success, which was an important lesson learned in the prior world war.

Because during [WWI], weather forecasting turned from a practice based on looking for repeated patterns in the past, to a mathematical model that looked towards an open future. Needless to say, a lot relied on accurate weather forecasting in wartime: aeronautics, ballistics, the drift of poison gas. But forecasts at this time were in no way reliable. …Richardson’s mathematical approach to weather forecasting was largely vindicated in the 1940s with the invention of the first digital computers, or “probability machines”. These are still the basis for much weather forecasting today.

Fun history fact, “weather front” became a phrase because modern weather forecasting was born in military predictions of weather at the front (of battle).

Thus, my complaint here is that I’m unconvinced by a simple notion that Japanese in mid-1942 couldn’t find any window for attack once they lost intercepts of American radio weather reports.

In the Pacific, the Japanese had a meteorological advantage over the Allies, thanks to Japanese weather stations ranging from Manchuria to Indochina, which allowed them to accurately predict conditions at sea.

The Japanese allegedly had sophisticated weather forecasting for the Pacific Ocean at the start of the war. And I suspect we don’t know much about it because it requires fluency in Japanese to expose better.

Another telling of the same story suggests it was a string of mechanical failures that forced three bombers out of the plan leaving only two to continue, and then those succumbed to equipment-related to navigation issues.

The H8Ks were supposed to attack in tandem, but the men in the second aircraft couldn’t hear the orders coming from the lead plane. The planes split up, and their bombs were dropped without proper targeting.

An American soldier even wrote at the time how Japanese appeared to be superior at war except in strength and equipment (such as the H8K lacking reliability and accuracy).

Source: Free Response Answer 25-0796, Survey, Attitudes of Combat Infantrymen, Questionnaire, Form E, Question 65

Thus we can’t just discount a string of weather stations that gave the Japanese advanced ability to predict clouds and rain as irrelevant to this story. In fact their model for Pacific Ocean operations was replicated by the Allies.

[Sino-American Cooperative Organization] established 70 meteorology stations throughout China, working out of caves, abandoned buildings, and military camps. Isolated teams of two or three men transmitted data three times a day to Happy Valley, where information was analyzed and relayed to the commander in chief of the Pacific. […] Located 400 miles north of Tokyo, [Inner Mongolia] Camp 4 could track weather patterns crossing central Asia to the Pacific sooner and more accurately than the Japanese.

Although, to be fair, even these advanced Allied weather stations seemed to run into hardship with the weather on long missions.

Motor Machinist’s Mate Matthew Komorowski-Kaye was stationed at Camp 3, a weather station and training facility in an abandoned Buddhist monastery…. One day he received orders to escort a convoy 1,000 miles to the east to Nationalist Chinese Column Five, which had not received supplies in more than a year. They set out in five old Chevy trucks, but as pelting rain turned the roads to rivers of mud, they had to abandon the trucks and resort to footpaths. …when they finally reached the column after 30 days, Komorowski-Kaye had dropped 30 pounds.

So much for superior equipment. At least he delivered his payload on target.

Perhaps it’s best to say that radio broadcasts out of Hawaii (observations) were an easy way to confirm conditions predicted by state-of-the-art weather stations in 1942. When a change in codes cut off the Japanese from hearing these broadcasts, their chances for mission success declined since they launched an audacious extremely long-range un-escorted “boat plane” operation that flew faster than usual weather predictions. Their equipment was prone to failures and they couldn’t pick and choose conditions for all the phases of an extremely fast plan (unlike with slow ships or short sorties from nearby bases).

Colonial Americans Did Not Believe in Freedom of Expression

From the Free Speech Center at Middle Tennessee State University (MTSU) comes this citation of historian Leonard Levy from his book Emergence of a Free Press (1985)

…the persistent notion of Colonial America as a society where freedom of expression was cherished is an hallucination which ignores history. […] The American people simply did not believe or understand that freedom of thought and expression means equal freedom for the other person, especially the one with hated ideas.

Even more to the point, MTSU shows proof of this in the pudding.

…the Sedition Act of 1798, which was designed to silence political opposition in the form of those Democratic-Republicans who favored better American relations with France. The draconian law prohibited “publishing any false, scandalous and malicious writing or writings against the government … with intent to defame … or to bring them … into contempt or disrepute.” The law was used to silence political opposition.

VPN Kill Switch Configuration Uncovers Fake Ubiquiti Whistleblower

Here’s a crime story with multiple interesting twists. Perhaps the biggest news is this part:

…former Ubiquiti developer, who has reportedly been charged with stealing data and trying to extort his employer while pretending to be a whistleblower.

Pretending to be a whistleblower in order to gain power or extort money is very serious act not least of all because it may undermine all legitimate whistleblowers.

Let me put that a different way, though. There seems to be a trend among staff attacking their employer while claiming protected status because they try to align their personal gain objectives with some greater interest.

I am reminded of people asking me about Tristan Harris’ real oppositional position to Google, as he suspiciously branded himself a whistleblower.

It seems to me he was most upset that he personally wasn’t profiting enough and given more power — to him the wrong people were getting all the money and fame. Thus Tristan charted a course for himself to get far more of that, and is primarily using his experience at Google to become famous and wealthy.

My favorite take-down of Tristan is from his not-very-ethical self-promotional movie pretending to be a documentary:

The film is really designed to showcase Tristan Harris, who probably takes up 1/3 of the screen time. Tristan made his name by being the internal “ethicist” at Google for a little while before setting out on his own to become the high prophet of “internet companies are trying to manipulate us!” But, as others have pointed out, Tristan has a habit of vastly exaggerating things, or being misleading himself. As just one example, highlighted by Antonio Garcia-Martinez in his must-read dismantling of the film, is that Harris argues that we didn’t have these same problems with earlier technologies — like the bicycle. But as Antonio points out, there was, in fact, quite a large moral panic about the bicycle…

I covered this “controversial machine” in my 2019 Keynote called “Whose AIs Are On Your Data“, not to mention for many years before.

Source: 2019 ISACA SF Keynote

Notably, the controversy about bicycles that “revolutionized politics” (pun presumably intended) was related to oppression and freedom of women.

Netflix failing to be in a 2020 Netflix film about companies like Netflix that do bad things, failing to include voices of women, comes across as a giant nail in Tristan’s attempted whistleblower status claim.

Shameless. But this also doesn’t change the fact that someone attacking their former employer may in fact expose them for serious mistakes.

Thus, the second notable point in the Ubiquiti crime story is a turnabout — how a supposed whistleblower has been exposed for making serious mistakes.

According to the indictment, after securing a job at another company, Sharp allegedly used his still functional privileged access to Ubiquiti’s systems at Amazon’s AWS cloud service to download large amounts of proprietary data. To cover his tracks, Sharp had used a SurfShark VPN connection to mask his real IP address. He then sent a ransom note to Ubiquiti using the same cover, demanding 25 bitcoin in exchange for a promise not to share the data. However, investigators were able to trace the downloads to Sharp because his flaky internet connection briefly failed multiple times, exposing his real IP address. And, he forgot to turn on the Kill Switch on his SurfShark VPN. By default, this is off.

As I said, you can see Ubiquiti exposed for using AWS infrastructure (infamously insecure configurations) leaving privileged access enabled for ex-staff, not to mention allowing massive extractions of data. That’s a lot of oops.

However, far more interesting in this case is Sharp being not so sharp. (They say the only criminals are dumb ones because if they’re smart they never get charged with being criminal.)

He bungled the basics of VPN configuration (likely because impatient, if not just sloppy and incompetant) after he bungled the basics of VPN purchase.

…investigators were also able to link the attacker’s VPN connection to a SurfShark account purchased with Sharp’s PayPal account.

The cost of SurfShark is so minimal, it begs the question why Sharp didn’t think to pay anonymously.

In this case, perhaps we also should ask why SurfShark markets itself for safety online while lacking any warning that it will by default expose your personal information (IP address).

In fact SurfShark warnings go the opposite direction from safety; when you enable the “kill switch” it warns your connection may be protected causing outages. It encourages you to operate less safely for the benefit of smooth connectivity.

“How to use Kill Switch” seems incredibly selfish and misleading of SurfShark (emphasizing better availability and thus fewer support calls, while failing at basic confidentiality — they had ONE job).

Windows:

Source: SurfShark

OSX:

Source: SurfShark

Android:

Source: SurfShark

iOS:

Source: SurfShark

How to abseil a 200 foot tree with 100 feet of rope

Get a longer rope.

Here is an amusing footnote from British special forces history. In short (pun not intended) there was a distinct shift from Orde Wingate’s 1940s self-reliant “long line” marches by “Chindits” into Burma, let alone F. Spencer Chapman‘s work in Malaysia… to the British SAS getting slightly “hung up” when parachuting in the 1950s:

Equipped with 100 feet of rope, the paratroopers would tie the rope to the tree and abseil down to the ground. The technique was first instigated in 1953. However, it was found that many trees were taller than 100 feet, so the amount of rope carried was doubled to 200 feet.

Perhaps the rank incompetence of the Colonial Office (e.g. Sir Shenton Thomas’ retreat) was foreshadowing?

Whitehall bungling and incompetence leading directly to the fall of Singapore in 1942 has been disclosed for the first time by Whitehall officials. Papers relating to the wartime defence of Malaya and Singapore were considered so sensitive that they have been withheld from public inspection for 50 years – 20 years beyond the normal release date for official files. But the newly published government papers confirm that British efforts to scapegoat Australian forces and the Governor of the Straits Settlements for the most humiliating debacle in the history of the Empire could well have been motivated by a wish to deflect attention from Whitehall’s far greater dereliction of duty.

A need for better knowledge of the environment and risks seems like exactly what the British military should have taken from WWII; as Chapman himself published details in his 1949 public memoir…

1st Edition. Hardcover published 1949 in New York by W. W. Norton & Company

Yet somehow someone in the 1950s didn’t bother to check in with Chapman, let alone the height of trees before jumping into them, especially after at least a decade of prior military missions run beneath them?

This 97.58m tree is 120 feet too tall for a 200 foot rope
To be fair, a 300 foot tall Yellow Maranti stands out

Speaking of being bad at estimating environment/size, I’m reminded of a Delta memoir that made some obvious cultural errors.