Category Archives: History

History, Security

White Nationalist Now Runs Pentagon Prayer Services

Leave a comment

Pete Hegseth didn’t invite a chaplain to the Pentagon. He invited Doug Wilson, a white Christian nationalist from Moscow, Idaho, who runs nearly 500 schools he calls “munitions factories” and describes his students as “foot soldiers.”

The “munition” and “soldier” language sounds like war for a reason. Wilson means it operationally.

Munitions factories produce weapons.

Foot soldiers deploy them.

He said this on the record as a warning.

Wilson’s theology is explicit dominion doctrine. As he told CNN:

Every society is theocratic. The only question is who’s Theo.

Democracy is a competing theology to defeat. Christ replaces Demos. The congregation replaces the electorate. The prayer meeting is a briefing.

As PRRI’s new data on Christian nationalism shows, the correlation between Trump favorability and Christian nationalist ideology is r=0.80. The ideology and the political machinery are the same thing measured two ways.

The reason we need to talk about Wilson at the Pentagon is because he is what that number looks like when it is invited inside to take control.

Structural Political Violence

Wilson’s role is authorization. The theological framework he’s installing at the Pentagon transforms every future domestic deployment from an act of state violence into an act of divine obedience. Troops exercise dominion. Cities get reclaimed. The language of occupation becomes the language of faith.

This is exactly how the permission structure works. Christian nationalism doesn’t just correlate with support for political violence — it provides the moral architecture that makes violence feel righteous. Thirty percent of Christian nationalism adherents supported political violence under Biden. When Trump won, support for violence against the state dropped because the state became their instrument of violence. Wilson at the Pentagon is the next step: consecrating that instrument to crusade against opposition.

Hierarchy Is the Point

Wilson’s positions aren’t presented by him as fringe opinions bolted onto mainstream theology. The stuff nobody says anymore is for him the entire infrastructure.

That’s why, like Peter Thiel, he says women don’t count. He calls for a repeal of the 19th Amendment on principle, not as a priority. Women in his world submit to husbands. Households get only one vote, and it’s cast only by the man. His 1999 book describes male sexuality as a method of conquest and colonization of women, in very clear terms that aren’t metaphorical.

That’s why he promotes slavery. He’ll call mass systemic rape of Black women to sell their children “unbiblical” while claiming it produced “genuine affection between the races.” He says the white men who raped Black women to sell their children were “decent human beings.” The topic is framed as a template to reinstate, not a history lesson. Hierarchy gets advocated as natural. Authority by race is called divine. Obedience is how he describes love.

Install white supremacist hate, formerly considered domestic terrorism, inside the control rooms at the Pentagon and then what?

Command is about to be defined as sacred and submission as virtue. The underlying question becomes what orders such a thoughtless command system will be asked to justify.

Hegseth, Worship and Aryan Nations

Wilson opened a branch of Christ Church in Washington in a building owned by Mark Meadows’s think tank. Hegseth and his family are his regular worshippers.

That’s external yet direct institutional capture of the Pentagon. A preacher from a town whose name should ring alarms for anyone who remembers the Aryan Nations compound at Hayden Lake now runs prayer services for the infamously tattooed Secretary of Defense.

Source: Twitter

Wilson’s infrastructure extends far beyond one church. A publishing house. Streaming shows. Nearly 500 schools coast to coast. He told NPR he sees his educational enterprises as munitions factories. He’s telling you exactly what he’s building, and Hegseth just gave him a key to the building where the actual munitions are.

Repeating Worst History on Purpose

Ludwig Müller was a military chaplain at the Königsberg garrison when the Nazis rose to power in 1933. He had already co-founded the Deutsche Christen, a “positive Christianity” movement fusing theology with racial nationalism. Hitler elevated him to Reich Bishop, tasked with consolidating 28 Protestant churches into a single institution under state ideological control.

His job was Gleichschaltung: making the theological infrastructure serve the political machinery. He rewrote the Sermon on the Mount to eliminate whatever he deemed “meek.” His movement had already declared during WWI that “pacifism is blasphemy against God” — the Reich Church made it policy.

In 2026, Hegseth installed Doug Wilson at the Pentagon.

1933 2026
Theologian in the military Ludwig Müller, military chaplain, appointed Reich Bishop by Hitler Doug Wilson, dominion theologian, leads Pentagon prayer for Hegseth
Movement Deutsche Christen — Christianity fused with racial nationalism Christian nationalism — dominion theology fused with white evangelical identity
Infrastructure 28 churches consolidated into one Reich Church Nearly 500 schools, publishing house, streaming shows, D.C. church
Racial doctrine Aryan Christianity, Jewish elements purged from scripture Slavery apologia, repeal of women’s suffrage, criminalization of homosexuality
Language Sermon on the Mount rewritten; “pacifism is blasphemy” “Munitions factories,” “foot soldiers,” “every society is theocratic”
Violence SA deployed before power, then channeled through state 30% backed political violence under Biden, support dropped when Trump won
Christian resistance Confessing Church, Barmen Declaration, Bonhoeffer — arrested, executed Rep. James Talarico — CBS preemptively complied with FCC pressure to suppress his interview

Historian Doris Bergen spent thirty years researching the thousand Wehrmacht chaplains who served the Nazi regime. Her conclusion, published in Between God and Hitler:

In the Nazi empire, Christianity and Christian chaplains were essential components in a system of ideas, structures, and narratives that protected and rewarded the perpetrators of genocide and their communities even as it erased their victims and denied their crimes.

Her central question asking “whom or what does a chaplain serve” is the one Wilson already answered for us on camera.

He knows exactly whom he serves. So does Hegseth.

Pentagon of Theocracy

In 1934, actual Christians responded. The Confessing Church issued the Barmen Declaration, drafted by Karl Barth:

We reject the false doctrine, as if the church could place the Word and work of the Lord in the service of any arbitrarily chosen desires, purposes, and plans.

Hundreds of pastors were arrested. Dietrich Bonhoeffer, who warned that the church must “not just bandage the victims under the wheel, but put a spoke in the wheel itself,” was executed at Flossenbürg in April 1945.

He was 39.

In 2026, Rep. James Talarico, a Presbyterian seminarian running for Senate in Texas, tried to make the same argument on national television. CBS lawyers preemptively blocked the interview from broadcast, citing FCC guidance that the Trump administration had rewritten in January to strip talk shows of their longstanding news exemption. The network then denied it had censored him. Colbert aired the interview on YouTube instead. It got 7.3 million views. Talarico raised $2.5 million in 24 hours.

The suppression didn’t work the way Bonhoeffer’s arrest worked. But the mechanism is the one this post is about: institutional compliance dressed as procedural caution. CBS performed the chilling effect voluntarily. That’s how Gleichschaltung scales — you don’t need to arrest everyone if the institutions censor themselves.

The theological authorization chain is now installed at the Pentagon. A man who describes civic life as theocratic conquest is praying over the people who command the military. A Secretary of Defense who treats his position as a culture war deployment is receiving spiritual counsel from someone who produces “foot soldiers” and builds “munitions factories.”

When Hegseth pushes troops to American cities, the justification will be theological. Militant dominion on the whims of Trump. Spiritual warfare as public policy.

Doug Wilson spent decades overtly espousing exactly this domestic terror framework. Hegseth just flipped it from national security threat to national security capture.

Nazi Gleichschaltung was the same.

History, Poetry, Security

Citrini AI Bear Porn is a Lesson in Helplessness

Leave a comment

A financial research piece called “The 2028 Global Intelligence Crisis” went viral last week. Written as a fictional memo from the future, it describes AI destroying the white-collar economy in two years flat: 38% market crash, 10.2% unemployment, mortgage crisis, Occupy Silicon Valley. Six thousand likes. Fifteen hundred restacks. People are genuinely frightened.

The piece opens with this:

This isn’t bear porn or AI doomer fan-fiction. The sole intent of this piece is modeling a scenario that’s been relatively underexplored.

What a time to be alive and study disinformation.

The Preface is the Payload

Disinformation research has a name for this. The negation frame. When you say “I’m not saying the president is a criminal,” you’ve just put “president” and “criminal” in the same sentence and activated the association. The disclaimer doesn’t neutralize the content. It delivers the content while inoculating the speaker against accountability for having delivered it.

“This isn’t bear porn” is bear porn with a permission slip. “This is a scenario, not a prediction” is a prediction with a liability shield. The authors are financial researchers, not amateurs. They understand that four thousand words of precision-formatted panic — complete with fake Bloomberg headlines, specific ticker symbols, and a fictional 38% drawdown — land in the nervous system long before the reader processes the caveat.

This is the lesson disinformation doctrine learned from War of the Worlds and never forgot.

What War of the Worlds Actually Taught

Martin Seligman found in 1967 that dogs subjected to inescapable shocks eventually stopped trying to escape even when the door was open. He called it learned helplessness, the condition where a subject has been trained to believe that no action they take will change the outcome, so they stop acting. Orson Welles had demonstrated the broadcast version of the same trick much earlier.

On October 30, 1938, Welles broadcast a radio drama about a Martian invasion, formatted as a series of news bulletins. The format was the weapon. Listeners who tuned in after the opening disclaimer heard what sounded like real reporters describing real events.

Intelligence services studied Welles carefully. What they learned: you don’t need to lie. You need to perform authority in a format the audience already trusts, deliver an emotional payload, and attach a disclaimer that provides deniability. The content can be speculative or fictional. The format does the work.

“The 2028 Global Intelligence Crisis” is formatted as a CitriniResearch Macro Memo dated June 30th, 2028. It uses Bloomberg headline formatting with ticker symbols. It cites percentages to two decimal places. It references named companies, named products, named financial instruments. Every convention says: this is real financial analysis. The single line that says otherwise is buried in a preface most readers will barely remember by paragraph four.

The Irresistible Denial

Three negation frames in two sentences:

This isn’t bear porn or AI doomer fan-fiction. The sole intent of this piece is modeling a scenario that’s been relatively underexplored.

Each negation introduces exactly the concept it claims to reject. And “underexplored” positions the authors as brave truth-tellers rather than people producing the most viral AI panic content on Substack.

Then near the end:

We are certain some of these scenarios won’t materialize.

Which parts? They don’t say. Because specifying would break the spell. The vagueness of the hedge preserves the totality of the fear.

The Machine With No Operator

The format trick enables a more dangerous move: erasing human agency from every decision in the scenario.

The piece describes a “negative feedback loop” as though it were a thermodynamic process with no intervention point. But every link in that chain is a decision made by a person with a name and a title:

  • A board votes to cut 15% of headcount rather than retrain, redeploy, or reduce shareholder returns.
  • A procurement manager cancels a vendor contract for an untested internal build.
  • A CEO funnels all cost savings into compute rather than worker transition.
  • A bank continues underwriting against income assumptions it knows are impaired.
  • A regulator declines to update employment protections.
  • A legislator blocks transition support.
  • A lab ships capability without deployment guardrails.

The piece names none of these people. Instead: “The companies most threatened by AI became AI’s most aggressive adopters.” Companies don’t adopt anything. Executives adopt things, boards approve them, shareholders reward them. Each decision has a fiduciary duty attached and a legal framework governing it.

Then the alibi:

What else were they supposed to do? Sit still and die slower?

That converts choices into a hostage situation. It says these executives had no agency. This is the competent complicity defense — the same logic used after the 2008 mortgage crisis and the Boeing 737 MAX. Capable professionals executing decisions they knew would cause harm, pointing to competitive pressure as exoneration. “What else were they supposed to do?” isn’t analysis. It’s an alibi.

Who Benefits from Helplessness

War of the Worlds didn’t just scare people. It made them feel helpless against a force they couldn’t negotiate with, couldn’t vote out, couldn’t hold accountable. The Martians weren’t making decisions. They were an event happening to humanity.

The Citrini piece does the same with AI. The feedback loop has no off switch because no human hand is on any switch. This is the atmosphere specific actors need:

  • Compute owners need inevitability because it makes regulation seem pointless.
  • Lab executives need it because unstoppable forces absolve them of deployment decisions.
  • Deregulation politicians need it because you don’t regulate an earthquake — you build shelters after.
  • AI-sector financial analysts need it because “AI destroys the economy” means “AI is the most important thing in the world,” which is the thesis their publication depends on.

The co-author’s hedge fund held short positions in the companies the report named. The original email to subscribers identified the collaboration as institutional — “CitriniResearch & LOTUS have written this.” After the market moved, the website was edited to say “our friend Alap Shah posed the question.” Ani Bruna has documented the attribution changes and the disclosure gaps. The question of who benefits from helplessness turns out to have a specific, dollar-denominated answer.

The piece describes protesters blockading Anthropic and OpenAI, then frames them as a symptom of social breakdown rather than people responding rationally to identifiable decisions by identifiable executives. The format performs concern. The structure delivers inevitability. That isn’t analysis. It’s marketing with a furrowed brow.

The Panic About the Panic

Final parallel. The mass panic of 1938 was largely a myth. Most listeners understood it was fiction. But newspapers ran the panic story for weeks because they had a competitive interest in discrediting radio as a news medium. The real story wasn’t gullible listeners. It was an industry using manufactured fear to protect its position.

Same structure now. The piece goes viral. People get scared. The fear becomes the news. And the people positioned to benefit — compute investors, lab executives, AI-sector analysts — gain leverage from an atmosphere where displacement feels like destiny rather than a series of decisions they are actively making.

The question was never whether AI will destroy the white-collar economy in two years. The capabilities aren’t there — a Mag7 engineer in the piece’s own comments says as much. The question is whether identifiable people making identifiable decisions will be held accountable for the displacement they choose to cause, or whether they’ll hide behind a narrative formatted to look like expertise, disclaimed to look like a thought exercise, and designed to make you feel like there’s nothing you can do.

The machine isn’t in charge. The people building it, shipping it, and profiting from it are making choices. They’d prefer you believe otherwise.

Orson Welles, at least, had the decency to be making art. As Bertolt Brecht put it in The Resistible Rise of Arturo Ui:

Do not rejoice in his defeat, you men. For though the world has stood up and stopped the bastard, the bitch that bore him is in heat again.

Energy, History, Security

Defamation as Dispossession: Big Oil Uses Courts to Censure Nation and Greenpeace

Leave a comment

A North Dakota judge just finalized erasure of Native American rights with an absurd $345 million judgment. It claims to be against Greenpeace for, among other things, defamation of Energy Transfer during the Dakota Access Pipeline protests. The defamation finding is bullshit. It rests on two very political and narrow claims the jury decided: that the pipeline crossed Standing Rock Sioux tribal land, and that DAPL personnel desecrated sacred burial grounds.

Read that again.

The defamation verdict requires the court to rule that Indigenous people’s own claims about their land and sacred sites are not just disputed but demonstrably false because the billionaire white men of Big Oil say so.

That’s 1800s disinformation at work in 2026.

Erasure Mechanism

The Standing Rock Sioux’s position that the pipeline crosses their land is grounded in the 1851 Fort Laramie Treaty, which established boundaries the federal government subsequently ignored.

Whether the pipeline “crosses tribal land” depends on a legal framework you recognize. Do you believe in the treaty that the United States signed, or in the illegal seizures that followed?

The burial ground claim reflects what tribal members themselves reported about construction disturbance to sacred sites — reports that prompted challenges to the Army Corps of Engineers’ own environmental review as inadequate.

Greenpeace didn’t fabricate these claims. They amplified what Indigenous people were saying about their own land, their own treaties, their own sacred places. To find those statements “demonstrably false,” the jury had to accept Energy Transfer’s legal framework as the only valid one — ruling the tribe’s understanding of their territory out of existence as a prerequisite for the verdict.

The people whose dispossession created the underlying dispute got erased twice: first from their land, then from the factual record.

Oil Fumbled and Dropped the Ball to Win the Match

Energy Transfer quietly withdrew all defamation claims related to Greenpeace’s water and climate statements before trial. The core environmental and public health arguments that motivated the entire protest — the reason thousands of people showed up — were too defensible to take before a jury. What remained were narrower claims about treaty boundaries and burial grounds, reframed as simple factual falsehoods rather than the contested historical and legal disputes they actually are.

Energy Transfer’s former CEO Kelcy Warren fought to avoid deposition entirely, and the company argued that pipeline safety documents were “patently irrelevant” once they dropped the water and climate claims. Strip away the substance of the dispute, leave only the claims you can win by denying Indigenous legal standing, and call it defamation.

$50 Million Charge for a UN Report

The judgment includes tens of millions of dollars against Greenpeace International for co-signing a letter with over 500 other organizations that echoed findings from United Nations reports. The UN recognized the Indigenous position. Hundreds of organizations recognized it. A jury in Morton County, North Dakota — where the pipeline is critical infrastructure — said it was all false anyway.

Greenpeace International’s entire involvement in the on-the-ground protests amounted to six employees visiting the camps. Their real offense was lending institutional credibility to Indigenous claims that Energy Transfer needed erased.

SLAPP Architecture

North Dakota has no anti-SLAPP statute. There was no procedural mechanism to challenge the reframing of contested historical claims as defamation before it reached a jury. Energy Transfer’s first attempt was a federal RICO lawsuit — the statute designed to prosecute organized crime — which a federal judge dismissed in 2019, stating the evidence fell “far short.” So they refiled in state court with state law claims, in a jurisdiction where the pipeline moves 40% of North Dakota’s oil production.

That structure is textbook aggression: use a legal system that lacks procedural safeguards, in a venue with maximum structural bias, to convert political speech into tortious conduct. Greenpeace has countersued in the Netherlands under the EU’s anti-SLAPP Directive — the first test of that law — because the American system provided no defense against the strategy.

The Actual Verdict

Defamation doctrine distinguishes between statements of fact and expressions of opinion or rhetorical hyperbole. Protest speech has historically received strong protection precisely because reasonable listeners understand it as advocacy, not factual reporting. This verdict collapses that distinction entirely.

But the deeper problem isn’t doctrinal. It’s that the entire defamation finding is constructed on a foundation of Indigenous erasure. You can only call “this pipeline crosses tribal land” a false statement of fact if you’ve already decided that tribal land claims don’t exist. The 1851 treaty doesn’t count. The tribe’s understanding of their own territory doesn’t count. The UN’s recognition doesn’t count. Only Energy Transfer’s title, derived from the very dispossession being protested, counts.

Defamation law became the instrument for completing what the pipeline started.

The land was taken.

Now the right just to admit the truth and say it was taken has been priced by an American court at $345 million.

History, Sailing, Security

Dorsey’s Letter of Marque Signals Trouble for Block: Half the Crew Dumped Overboard to Stay Afloat

Leave a comment

Jack Dorsey fired over 4,000 people on Thursday — basically half of Block’s workforce — during a profitable year, then told the rest of the tech industry to do the same. The stock jumped 23%. That sequence tells you what actually happened and why.

Block posted $1.3 billion in profit. Gross profit grew 24% year over year. Cash App surged 33%. Dorsey himself called it a “strong year.” Then he immediately gutted the company and framed failure as visionary leadership, writing in his shareholder letter that “tools have changed what it means to build and run a company.”

Tools. They haven’t changed what it means. They’ve changed how to destroy value.

Numbers Behind Narrative

Block had 3,835 employees at the end of 2019. Dorsey’s vision was to triple that to over 12,500 by the end of 2022, intentionally building redundant parallel structures for Square and Cash App. The stock peaked at $281 in August 2021. It closed Thursday at $54, crashing down over 80% from the high. Now the after-hours bump on layoff news pushed it toward $67.

So the actual story isn’t CEO use of “tools changed everything in December.” The actual story is that Dorsey overhired massively during COVID, mismanaged the organizational structure by his own admission, watched the stock collapse for four years, and is now using tools as the explanation for a correction that has nothing to do with technical capability and everything to do with executive failure.

Executive failure. I’ll say it again.

He admitted on X that he “incorrectly built 2 separate company structures rather than 1”, yet somehow that isn’t the headline. Wharton’s Ethan Mollick pointed out that given how new effective AI tools actually are:

It is hard to imagine a firm-wide sudden 50%+ efficiency gain that justifies massive organizational cuts.

Allow me to explain. It’s hard to imagine because it didn’t happen.

What happened is a CEO found a narrative that Wall Street would reward him while he screwed the people he was responsible for.

Assembly Line Test

Here’s how you know this isn’t innovation: look at actual innovation and headcount.

Henry Ford didn’t copy the European moving assembly line and then fire half his workers. He hired massively, doubled wages to $5 a day, and scaled production from thousands of cars to millions. The resistance came from craft workers worried about displacement. The actual outcome was more jobs at higher pay producing dramatically more output. That’s what real tool adoption looks like, leading to expansion of capacity, not extraction of labor.

The steam engine didn’t shrink navies. It expanded operational range, mission tempo, and fleet size. You retrain the crew. You don’t throw them overboard.

When a CEO fires half the company during a record profit year and the stock jumps 23%, that’s not an efficiency gain. That’s cynical destruction of the crew that made delivery possible.

Pirates Had Articles

The distinction matters if you know history. Actual pirates, like the ones flying black flags in the Caribbean, operated under articles of agreement. They elected their captains. They voted on major decisions. They split loot according to pre-agreed shares. They even had disability provisions: lose a right arm in battle, receive 600 pieces of eight. Lose an eye, 100. These compensation structures predated any national welfare system by centuries.

You couldn’t be a Dorsey and throw crew overboard on a pirate ship because the crew had collective power over the operation. The captain served at the pleasure of the people doing the actual work.

English buccaneers of the Crown were the Dorsey model. King-licensed exploitation and extraction. Rape and pillage. The letter of marque made everything legal so long as the loot flowed upward. Crews were expendable because the authority structure came from the above crown and trading companies, not from the workers themselves.

The East India Company didn’t share profits with sailors. It consumed them and spat out bones. Crews died of scurvy and abuse at rates that would count as attrition strategy, not negligence. When a voyage was done, survivors got dumped in port towns with nothing.

Dorsey’s Marque

Dorsey’s shareholder letter is a letter of marque. The crown is Wall Street. The 23% stock jump is the loot delivery. And the 4,000 people aren’t crew with articles and shared stakes because they’re disposable labor in a colonial extraction model where the entire point is to minimize the number of people who get a cut.

The “AI monster” framing is the modern version of “the sea monster took them.”

It externalizes the decision to an impersonal force so leadership never has to own the choice. But Dorsey made the choice. During a profitable year. After years of mismanagement he’s now acknowledged. And the market rewarded him for it, which is exactly how the crown rewarded buccaneers. The system was less about building anything to last, more about doing more immediately with less overhead.

His warning that “most companies are late” to the same “realization” reads less like strategic insight and more like herd mentality for CEOs to do what they already wanted to do. It’s CYA dressed as vision. The same pattern you’d expect from someone who already ran this play at Twitter, where mass layoffs were the default move regardless of rationale.

The $2 Million Target

Dorsey’s stated goal is $2 million in gross profit per employee — four times the pre-COVID level of roughly $500,000 per head. That number sounds like an efficiency metric. It’s actually a concentration metric. It measures how few people get to share in the value the company produces. A company generating $12.2 billion in gross profit with 6,000 workers isn’t more innovative than one doing it with 10,000.

It’s more extractive. Colonial plantations by the British ran this principle.

Ford’s assembly line made cars cheaper and workers richer. Dorsey’s “intelligence-native company” makes shareholders richer and workers gone. One is industrialization. The other is ruthless extractive enclosure by fencing off the commons and charging rent for standing on it.

Block will spend $450 to $500 million on restructuring charges, mostly severance. That’s the cost of dumping 4,000 people overboard. The 23% stock jump added roughly $4 billion in market cap in a single evening. The math of extraction always works for the people holding the letter of marque, and only them

Competent captains made crews successful and expanded capability. The ones who dumped people overboard were either panicking or looking for an excuse to run a skeleton crew at maximum extraction. Dorsey’s stock price tells you which one the market thinks he is. History will tell you which one he actually was.