All posts by Davi Ottenheimer

Trump White House Press Ban Matches 1933 Nazi Law

A lawyer who named Mein Kampf his favorite book of 2013, and praised Hitler’s grasp of propaganda, has now signed a brief asking the courts to defer to the President’s personal judgment that journalists are national security threats.

Hitler’s 1933 state labeled someone an enemy by judgment of their views, and treated their speech as a threat to the security of the nation.

First were political opponents of Hitler. That meant Communists and Social Democrats filled Dachau within two months of him seizing power.

Memorial block for Richard Lipinski, the Leipzig SPD chairman and Reichstag deputy who voted against Hitler’s Enabling Act. The regime imprisoned him, killing him in 1936. He is one of the 96 Reichstag deputies the Nazis murdered.

The regime then extended it to Jews and a growing list of others. The list grew as officials improvised toward whatever they understood Hitler wanted, under legal instruments that licensed action outside the ordinary law. The mechanism always stayed the same.

The Trump administration is using the same mechanism today. His Justice Department brief filed September 22 in CNN v. Trump (D.D.C. No. 1:26-cv-03287) applies it to the press.

The brief and the Trump administration’s own statements line up with Hitler’s regime, row by row.

1933 2026
Mein Kampf I/10: the state must ignore the “Geflunker einer sogenannten Pressefreiheit” (humbug of so-called press freedom). DOJ brief: White House access is “a privilege.” Asks the court to overrule Sherrill v. Knight.
Mein Kampf I/10: the state must shield the people from bad or malicious “educators” and watch the press most closely. DOJ brief: the President decides who is a “bona fide” journalist.
Mein Kampf I/10: press freedom means “straflose Volksbelügung und Volksvergiftung” (unpunished lying to and poisoning of the people). White House letters: “trafficking in verifiable falsehoods about national security.” Trump: fake news has “grown like Cancer.”
Goebbels, introducing the Schriftleitergesetz: he intends to remain the press’s “warm-hearted protector.” Trump: “not instituting an assault on the Free Press, something which I cherish.”
Hitler: Social Democrats as Novemberverbrecher, the traitors who stabbed the army in the back. Trump on Democratic lawmakers: “SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR, punishable by DEATH.”
Mein Kampf I/10: take the press out of the hands of “Volksfremden und Volksfeinden” (aliens and enemies of the people). NSPM-7: “extremism on migration, race, and gender” as a common thread of domestic terrorism.
Reichstag Fire Decree, “zum Schutz von Volk und Staat”: press freedom suspended. DOJ brief: courts should defer to the President’s “personal judgment of national security considerations.”

A legal instrument is paired with a category the state defines. The 2026 list covers immigrants, “extremism” on gender, Democratic lawmakers accused of sedition, and now three news organizations. The mechanism accepts any label.

Michael Velchik, the Justice Department lawyer who signed the CNN ban brief, submitted a Harvard Latin paper written from Hitler’s perspective in 2011, according to three people in the department. And last year he argued the absurd Harvard funding case, claiming it was the fight against antisemitism.

Trump has already announced the next entry for his Hitler-era targeting machine: “Other Fake News Media Outlets to follow.”

Tesla Dangerous Sleeping Driver Defect Caught Again by CHP

The California Highway Patrol stopped a dangerous Tesla on Interstate 80 operating at 60 mph with its driver slumped asleep behind dark glasses. Officers cited him for unsafe speed, because the Vehicle Code treats him as the driver of a Level 2 car and holds him to every rule of the road.

That settles his liability. The car kept going because Tesla’s defective driver monitoring is… defective. Tesla claims it points a camera at the driver’s face to catch exactly this, and yet it let a sleeping man ride at highway speed behind a pair of sunglasses.

Manufacturers must address foreseeable misuse. That should be obvious. But sunglasses are an even lower bar to entry, because they are standard equipment for California drivers. Detection of standard driver alertness is even more critical than edge cases of misuse. The system can not be called safe if standard conditions fail unsafe.

Tesla recalled more than two million cars in December 2023 to strengthen its driver engagement controls, and NHTSA opened a review in 2024 of whether that remedy even worked. Tesla has made a reputation for its “fixes” being worse than before, its safety and value declining over time.

An NBC investigation has since found 43 videos of Tesla owners asleep or distracted at the wheel, 17 of them from 2026, and Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi has asked NHTSA whether the cabin camera can be beaten with a hat or sunglasses.

Reporters in Solano County just supplied the clear answer, that Tesla failed. The recall failed. The engineering is below the lowest bar.

The company known for burning people alive with defective door designs, after crashing into poles with defective AI designs, had a duty to build monitoring that works on drivers in dark glasses. Instead it has watched driver after driver sleep at highway speeds and done nothing. That’s what the CHP call a violation of basic speed law.

CHP stated, ‘Regardless of any special features a vehicle may possess…drivers are still responsible for the vehicle they are operating.’ The spokesman of CHP added that if a driver is found asleep behind the wheel, they are violating California’s basic speed law.

Basic. Not hard. Not advanced. Basic. Tesla engineering still can’t meet the most basic speed law.

Anyone spreading disinformation like “sleeping at the wheel of a self-driving car” is inventing a legal category that doesn’t exist; repeats Tesla’s fraudulent marketing. California banned saying exactly that in a 2022 law: prohibits manufacturer or dealer from deceptively naming or marketing partial automation features.

Therefore someone repeating Tesla PR there is “no law against it” should be stopped before they are dead and informed that there is “no new law needed, because the driver is fully liable.”

The evidence is clear why Tesla crashes keep going higher, killing more people in less time than ever. It’s the same case as a CEO of a construction company who made bridges that fatally collapsed killing people in cars, except he was sentenced to 18 years in jail while Elon Musk walks free.

The driver-assistance software it sells as “Full Self-Driving” produced 826 reported crashes in the first half of 2026, dramatically up from 476 a year earlier and 180 in 2022, with July 2026 the worst single month on record, after records in May and then again in June. Tesla promised a lower crash rate and withholds the data that would show it; the only number it is forced to publish by law is the count, and the crash count has quadrupled.

Tesla’s own reports to NHTSA under the Standing General Order. January through June crashes, 2022 to 2026: 180, 261, 269, 476, 826. A 4.6x rise over five years. The increase from 2025 to 2026 alone (350) is nearly double the 2022 total for the same six months. Monthly records fell three times running: 207 in May, 209 in June, 236 in July, with four fatal crashes in July. Source: Electrek

Tesla in 35 mph Zone Crashes 80 mph Head-on Into Traffic

The reporters say the driver was representing Tesla, showing photographers the brand experience.

Video obtained by The Almanac shows a Tesla reaching over 80 mph in a marked 35 mph zone shortly before it lost control and collided head-on with a Honda on Highway 84 near Memory Lane in La Honda. The crash on Aug. 30 occurred after a car meet organized by 9burgring, a social media account for car enthusiasts with nearly 20,000 followers.