Jaywalking is a Fantasy Crime

Brilliant comedy routine by Hannibal Buress

Humor helps underscore a very real problem with Jaywalking laws, which any historian should be able to tell you:

What sets jaywalking apart is that it never should have been against the law in the first place. City streets were meant for foot traffic and horses from ancient times until the early twentieth century. As a result, early automobiles found themselves alongside all sorts of pedestrians. To make way for cars, literally and figuratively, wealthy drivers and the U.S. auto industry set out to stigmatize lower-class pedestrians who crossed streets at will. Those who wouldn’t step aside for vehicles became known as “jay walkers”…

Or more exactly, clowns were repeatedly rammed by cars in public displays paid for by car manufacturers, to shame anyone walking on the street

Auto campaigners lobbied police to publicly shame transgressors by whistling or shouting at them — and even carrying women back to the sidewalk — instead of quietly reprimanding or fining them. They staged safety campaigns in which actors dressed in 19th-century garb, or as clowns, were hired to cross the street illegally, signifying that the practice was outdated and foolish. In a 1924 New York safety campaign, a clown was marched in front of a slow-moving Model T and rammed repeatedly.

I cover some of this history in my presentations on big data security, such as “Security in a World of Intelligent Machines

If you look carefully at that police notice from 1866 London it has two modes of operation for the red and green street lights:

  • CAUTION: all persons in charge of vehicles and horses are warned to pass the crossing with care, and due regard for the safety of foot passengers
  • STOP: vehicles and horses shall be stopped on each side of the crossing to allow passage of persons on foot; notice being given to all persons in charge of vehicles and horses to stop clear of the crossing

British railroad managers took ship right-of-way red/green lanterns and recommended using them to stop vehicles so pedestrians could walk safely.

American car manufacturers then took that street light concept and flipped it around completely, telling pedestrians to stay off roads, inventing a fantasy crime to shame and physically harm certain races of people for not driving.

Yes, you read that right. Racism permeates America’s enforcement of this fantasy crime:

In cases like jaywalking, which often hinge on police discretion, blacks accounted for 95 percent of all arrests.

And just to make the point even starker, North Dakota lawmakers in 2017 actively promoted the concept of using vehicles as a weapon to murder pedestrians, awarding zero liability for drivers:

A bill introduced by an oil patch lawmaker would provide an exemption for the driver of a motor vehicle if they unintentionally injured or killed a pedestrian obstructing traffic on a public road or highway.

“It’s shifting the burden of proof from the motor vehicle driver to the pedestrian,” said Rep. Keith Kempenich, R-Bowman

Several months later, Kempenich’s campaign led to a federal civil rights investigation of a white nationalist for murder instead of the zero liability for killing people with cars, which he had promoted to them.

One person was killed and 19 were hurt when a speeding car slammed into a throng of counterprotesters in Charlottesville, where a “Unite the Right” rally of white nationalist and other right-wing groups had been scheduled to take place, the city tweeted on its verified account.

A 32-year-old woman was killed while walking across the street, Charlottesville Police Chief Al Thomas said. Police were still in the process of notifying her family.

[…]

Federal authorities said a civil rights investigation into the deadly crash was opened hours after it happened.

In related news, dozens of cities today are restoring pedestrian rights and looking at ways to ban cars from streets:

  • Oslo, Norway
  • Madrid, Spain
  • Chengdu, China
  • Hamburg, Germany
  • Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Paris, France
  • London, England
  • Brussels, Belgium
  • Berlin, Germany
  • Mexico City, Mexico
  • Bogoto, Colombia
  • San Francisco, USA
  • New York, USA

And while Jaywalking is a fantasy crime that produces little if any positive results, Pontevedra, Spain is being called a paradise after banning cars across most of the city. It is quite clearly the opposite of the city in the Buress comedy routine:

Lores became mayor after 12 years in opposition, and within a month had pedestrianised all 300,000 sq m of the medieval centre, paving the streets with granite flagstones.

“The historical centre was dead,” he says. “There were a lot of drugs, it was full of cars – it was a marginal zone. It was a city in decline, polluted, and there were a lot of traffic accidents. It was stagnant. Most people who had a chance to leave did so. At first we thought of improving traffic conditions but couldn’t come up with a workable plan. Instead we decided to take back the public space for the residents and to do this we decided to get rid of cars.”

The results they have reported are amazing. Can’t wait to hear what Buress has to say about it.


Update Oct 2019

A kind reader sent another comedy video of great relevance:

Think about it, a group of private businessmen coined an offensive slur to promote their product and it worked so well that today it’s a legal term…the streets went from a public place where everyone was welcome to a terrifying off-limits death trap.

Update Feb 2021

Orange County Sheriff’s deputies argued whether or not a Black man had jaywalked and if it was necessary to stop him, then taunted and forcibly detained him until shooting him to death.

Stolen Tracking Devices Lead Investigators to Thieves

The lesson of this silly crime story is if your tracking devices imitate something techology-ish enough that thieves think it will easily sell, they will take a lot of them and reveal all their habits and patterns.

“These devices kind of look like cell phone chargers, so they probably thought they had some kind of street value,” Roambee Corporation Co-Founder Vidya Subramanian.

Subramanian is talking about the hundred or so GPS tracking devices that were stolen recently from the company’s Dela Cruz Avenue labs.

“The moment we realized they had a box of trackers, we went into recovery mode,” Subramanian said. “We notified the police and equipped them to track the devices, and in about 5 or 6 hours, it was done.”

Before making off with about $18,000 worth of the devices, the thieves grabbed a beer out of the fridge and cut themselves in the process, leaving fingerprints and blood evidence.

Who cuts themselves grabbing a beer at work? That sounds like OSHA violation if I ever heard one.

And on that note, the company developing these tracking devices is more than happy to tell you details of this story and how well their system worked.

Amazon Announces Reorganization to Stop Leaks

File this story with the infamous Facebook breach case that was rarely, if ever, discussed in public. Employees or contractors would pull hard drives from racks, throw into a bag, fly to an airport and leave on curb for buyers to pickup and harvest data from.

Amazon is being more public about their investigation, which as an ex-investigator I have to say seems odd to me. On the one hand this may be a good way to scare staff into following policy. On the other hand, this kind of public scare method pushes a big reset button on the active investigations as suspects wipe their trails:

…sellers get data about internal sales metrics and reviewers’ email addresses. The employees leaking the data are also said to be offering to delete negative reviews and restore banned Amazon accounts.

Amazon’s internal investigation into the matter began after the company was tipped off in May about the practice. Since then the company has shifted around executive roles in China to try to root out the bribery. However, the practice is not just occurring in China. Employees in the U.S. are said to be involved, too

That is a curious tone to end the paragraph. Amazon has not shifted around executive roles in the U.S…makes this sound like it isn’t really about investigating the problem (requiring secrecy), and rather could be pretense for a management reorg.

What if this isn’t about an internal investigation to protect customer data, and instead a pretense for purging executives in countries who do not fit corporate culture? I mean corporate culture could be religiously protecting customer data, or it also could be symptomatic of other labor topic headlines…such as “low-paid, overworked and unhappy”

Working conditions at Amazon.com aren’t any better than they are at Walmart. The difference is you don’t see Amazon’s employees.

More to the point about preventing leaks, bathroom breaks apparently aren’t allowed to Amazon staff:

California warehousing: “Amazon workers file class action suit over breaks, overtime pay”

U.S. corporate support: “Lawsuit says Amazon denied paralegals overtime and breaks”

U.S. shipping: “Amazon delivery drivers worked without breaks, weren’t paid for overtime”

Yes, preventing leaks is literally what Amazon management has been targeting for years:

Working at an Amazon warehouse in the U.K., James Bloodworth came across a bottle of straw-colored liquid on a shelf. It looked like pee.

How could he be sure? “I smelt it,” said the 35-year-old British journalist and author, talking about his new book “Hired: Six Months Undercover in Low-Wage Britain.” It was definitely pee, he said.

As he tells it, urinating into a bottle is the kind of desperation Amazon forces its warehouse workers into as they try to avoid accusations of “idling” and failing to meet impossibly high productivity targets — ones they are continually measured against by Big Brother-ish type surveillance.

It didn’t help that the nearest bathroom to where he worked was four flights of stairs below.

That smell? It’s just evidence that Amazon management’s anti-leak prevention may not be working

One US worker described an “awful smell” coming from warehouse trash cans, saying coworkers would urinate in them for fear of missing their targets because they took too much time to go to the bathroom.

Detection reportedly has been working however, according to this same story, beyond just the smell commented on by workers themselves.

camera evidence got these associates fired

Cameras, like telling the press an investigation is underway, are often positioned as prevention. Let’s be honest, though, they are far more effective as detection given how their overt methods tend to shift adversarial behavior into more clever camouflage. Will be interesting to see how the investigations end up, now that signs are posted everywhere that they are underway and leakers will be prosecuted.

Three Firefighters Dead. Gov Non-Compliance With Water Requirements Blamed

A horrifying story is in the news, about firefighters running up 23 flights of stairs to save people’s lives and then losing their own because of a building’s non-compliance with water requirements

The building housed the departments of health, human settlements and cooperative governance and traditional affairs for Gauteng, South Africa’s wealthiest province – home to Johannesburg and the capital, Pretoria.

A government report that has surfaced in the last few days revealed that the building was only 21% compliant with occupational health and safety standards, as opposed to the expected norm of 85%.

80% non-compliance. Compliance is another way of saying a codified language exists for measuring disaster preparedness, and lack of compliance is a likelihood measure of disaster. For example America’s oldest professional safety organization, the American Society of Safety Engineers (ASSE), was founded very purposefully six months after the Triangle fire.

When I hear people say they work on safety or security and do not know compliance, or choose to not focus on it, it seems like an engineer saying they do not believe in a code of ethics or taking an engineers’ creed:

To give the utmost of performance;
To participate in none but honest enterprise;
To live and work according to the laws of man and the highest standards of professional conduct;
To place service before profit, the honor and standing of the profession before personal advantage, and the public welfare above all other considerations

Investigations into a building’s woeful non-compliance will be the start, explaining how operations allowed people into a 21% facility and who is accountable, which should lead to a broader question of why only 85% is expected and whether that’s safe.