Recherchen zu den russischen Vulkangruppe-Anschlägen auf Berlin werfen erhebliche Zweifel an der hohl klingenden Behauptung von „linksextremem” Terror auf.

Ein Politiker sticht besonders hervor. Alexander Dobrindts Bilanz ist vernichtend. Sein politischer Werdegang vom CSU-Generalsekretär zum Bundesinnenminister ist von einem dokumentierten 15-jährigen Muster geprägt: Aufmerksamkeit auf linke Bedrohungen lenken, während rechte ignoriert oder ausradiert werden.

Relevant ist auch seine Erfolgsbilanz beim Infrastruktur-Risikomanagement. Derselbe Mann, der 50 Mbit/s für alle bis 2018 versprach, während er unter 2% der bewilligten Mittel auszahlte, der Kupfer statt Glasfaser förderte, während Deutschland auf den letzten Platz in europäischen Rankings absank – dieser Mann macht es jetzt wieder, diesmal bei der Analyse von Infrastrukturbedrohungen.

Ja. Sie haben richtig gelesen. Dobrindt schaute sich Kupfer und Glasfaser an und wählte… Kupfer. Hoppla. Falsch. Für sein Versagen wurde er in Deutschland als Münchhausen des Breitbands bekannt. Offenbar war er der Verantwortliche, der Deutschland auf den letzten Platz beim europäischen Glasfaserausbau brachte.

Derselbe Mann sagt jetzt, er habe sich linke und rechte Bedrohungsdaten angeschaut und sah nur… links. Hoppla. Schon wieder falsch.

Wird Deutschland das letzte Land sein, das erkennt, wer tatsächlich ihre Infrastruktur bombardiert?

Hier ein wahrer Münchhausen-Moment vom Juni 2025, als Dobrindt auf einer Pressekonferenz zum Verfassungsschutzbericht sprach:

Tatsächlich zeigt die Grafik, die er hochhält, dass die blauen „gewaltorientiert“-Balken von 2023-2024 völlig flach sind.

Wie viele damals anmerkten, sagte der Bericht das Gegenteil von dem, was Dobrindt behauptete. Das Personenpotenzial linker Gruppen stieg in einem Jahr von 37.000 auf 38.000. Die Zahl der gewaltorientierten Szenemitglieder blieb unverändert bei etwa 11.200.

Volksverpetzer berichtete es vielleicht am besten, mit angemessener Berliner Schnauze, die den offensichtlichen Fehler hervorhob:

Gewaltorientierte Linksextremisten „steigen deutlich” laut Innenminister Dobrindt von 11.200 auf 11.200 (kein Tippfehler).

Volksverpetzer wies auch darauf hin, wie Dobrindts Analysefehler sich fortsetzten und noch schlimmer wurden. Die Skala der y-Achse für das rechtsextremistische Personenpotenzial reichte von 0 bis 60.000. Bei der Darstellung des linksextremistischen Potenzials wurde sie jedoch auf 40.000 verschoben. Mit anderen Worten: Der Anstieg der Linksextremisten um unter drei Prozent wurde von Dobrindt visuell gleich groß dargestellt wie der fast 25-prozentige Anstieg auf 50.250 Personen bei den Rechtsextremisten.

Drei ist nicht dasselbe wie fünfundzwanzig. Ich dachte, Deutsche könnten gut rechnen.

Schockierend, ich weiß, aber auch ein Beleg für die Art von Inkompetenz, die offenbar bei den aktuellen Ermittlungen zu den russischen Vulkangruppe-Anschlägen vorherrscht.

Im Verfassungsschutzbericht 2023 hatte Nancy Faeser klar berichtet, dass Rechtsextremismus „die größte extremistische Bedrohung für unsere Demokratie” sei. Trotz eines 25-prozentigen Anstiegs im Folgejahr wurde diese zentrale Aussage 2024 unter Dobrindt vollständig gestrichen. Eine Begründung für diese Streichung wurde nicht gegeben.

Schauen Sie sich genau an, worauf Dobrindt 2025 saß, während er unerklärlich versuchte, den Fokus nur auf linke Gruppen zu lenken.

• Rechtsextremisten: 50.250 (PLUS 25%)
• Linksextremisten: 38.000 (PLUS 2,7%)
• Rechtsextreme Gewalttaten: (PLUS 47%)
• Linksextreme Gewalttaten: (MINUS 26,8%)

Dieser Mann behauptete, gewaltorientierte Linksextremisten würden „deutlich steigen”, während die Zahl buchstäblich unverändert war und die Straftaten um fast 30% zurückgingen. Gleichzeitig wurden die tatsächlichen rechtsextremen Bedrohungsdaten von ihm mit irreführenden Grafiken und der Streichung standardmäßiger Bedrohungseinschätzungen manipuliert und versteckt.

Dobrindts Bereitschaft, Bedrohungen zu erfinden und die echten zu verbergen, muss seinen Wahlkampfinteressen dienen. Welche andere Erklärung gibt es für diesen Unsinn mit den Bedrohungsdaten?

Ich vermute, CSU-Politiker glauben, sie könnten die AfD (Nazi) bei rechten Wählern übertrumpfen. Die AfD ist seit der bayerischen Landtagswahl 2023 um fünf Prozent auf 20 Prozent in aktuellen Umfragen gestiegen. Die grundlegende CSU-Doktrin (Franz Josef Strauß) war, dass „rechts von der CSU keine demokratisch legitimierte Partei existieren darf.” Das öffnet die Tür für das Erfinden linker Bedrohungen und das Ausradieren rechter, um die radikalsten Wähler davon abzuhalten, zur AfD (Nazi) abzuwandern.

Was uns zu den Schlagzeilen von 2026 bringt. Sein ZDF-Interview schloss eine russische Beteiligung am Berliner Blackout ausdrücklich aus – bevor die Ermittlungen abgeschlossen waren. Er erklärte präventiv „keine Hinweise” auf Russland, während er gleichzeitig ankündigte, die Überwachung nur der „linksextremen Szene” auszuweiten.

Er versucht immer noch, das falsche Narrativ zu verbreiten, die russische Vulkangruppe sei linksextrem.

Der Mann, der Kupfer und Glasfaser betrachtete und Kupfer wählte. Der 11.200 und 11.200 betrachtete und „deutlichen Anstieg” sah. Der russische Namenskonventionen, kyrillische Transliterationsfehler und GRU-Infrastruktur-Angriffswerkzeuge betrachtete und meint, er sah… definitiv nicht die Russen?

Fünfzehn Jahre Anschläge auf deutsche Infrastruktur. Null Verhaftungen. Eine Namenskonvention, die jeden Test deutscher linksextremer Praxis nicht besteht. Ein GRU-Auftragnehmer namens „Vulkan” – nach dem römischen Gott – im selben Jahr für Verschlusssachen freigegeben, in dem „Vulkangruppe” auftauchte. Und Deutschlands Innenminister erklärt „keine Hinweise” auf russische Beteiligung – verdächtig vor Abschluss der eigentlichen Ermittlungen.

Eine Regierung, die GRU-Angriffe auf ihre Infrastruktur anerkennt, muss reagieren. Eine Regierung, die inländische Extremisten beschuldigt, kann aufschieben, untersuchen und politische Punkte im Kampf mit der AfD sammeln, um sich selbst rechts zu überholen. Dobrindt scheint nicht dumm zu sein. Er ist wahrscheinlich eher… nun, wir werden es herausfinden.

Die Frage ist nicht, ob Dobrindt seine hohl klingenden Linksextremismus-Anschuldigungen überhaupt glaubt. Die Frage ist, ob sich Deutschland einen Innenminister leisten kann, dessen gesamte Karriere darauf aufgebaut ist, nach Bedrohungen zu suchen, die es nicht gibt, und andere dazu zu bringen, die echten zu übersehen.

Research on the Russian Vulkangruppe attacks on Berlin brings up significant reasons to question hollow-sounding insistence of “left-wing” terror.

One politician in particular stands out. Alexander Dobrindt’s receipts are damning. His political trajectory from CSU General Secretary to Federal Interior Minister comes with a documented 15-year pattern of driving attention towards left-wing threats while erasing or ignoring right-wing ones.

Relevant also is his track record on infrastructure risk management. The same man who promised 50 Mbit/s for all by 2018 while disbursing under 2% of allocated funds, who pushed copper over fiber while Germany sank to the bottom of European rankings, is now doing it again with his analysis of infrastructure threats.

Yes. You read that right. Dobrindt looked at copper and fiber options and chose… copper. Whoops. Wrong. For his failures he became known in Germany as the Münchhausen of Broadband. Apparently, he was the man in charge who pushed Germany to the bottom of European fiber deployment.

The same guy now says he looked at left-wing and right-wing threat data and saw only… left. Whoops. Wrong again.

Will Germany be the last to realize who’s actually bombing their infrastructure?

Here’s a true Münchhausen moment from June 2025, when Dobrindt spoke at a press conference about the Verfassungsschutz report:

Indeed, the chart he holds up shows “gewaltorientiert” blue bars of 2023-2024 are completely flat.

As many people pointed out at the time, the report said the opposite of what Dobrindt was claiming. The personnel potential of left-wing groups in one year went from 37K to 38K. The number of violence-oriented scene members remained unchanged at approximately 11,200.

Volksverpetzer perhaps reported it best, with an appropriate Berlin “Schnauze” tone highlighting the obvious error:

Violence-oriented left-wing extremists “rise significantly” according to Interior Minister Dobrindt from 11,200 to 11,200 (not a typo).

Volksverpetzer also pointed out how Dobrindt’s analysis errors continued and became even worse. The scale of a y-axis for right-wing extremist personnel potential was 0 to 60,000. However, for the presentation of left-wing extremist potential, it was shifted to 40,000. In other words, the increase of left-wing extremists by under three percent was presented by Dobrindt as the same visual amount as the nearly 25 percent increase to 50,250 persons for right-wing extremists.

Three is not the same as twenty-five. I thought Germans were supposed to be good at math.

Shocking to find out, I know, but also evidence of the kind of incompetence seemingly going on with current investigations of the Russian Vulkangruppe attacks.

In the 2023 Verfassungsschutzbericht, Nancy Faeser had clearly reported that right-wing extremism is “the greatest extremist threat to our democracy.” Despite a twenty-five percent rise the next year, this central statement is completely removed in 2024 under Dobrindt. No justification for this deletion was provided.

Look closely at what Dobrindt was sitting on in 2025, inexplicably trying to shift focus to only left-wing groups.

• Right-extremists: 50,250 (UP 25%)
• Left-extremists: 38,000 (UP 2.7%)
• Right-wing violent crimes: UP 47%
• Left-wing violent crimes: DOWN 26.8%

This guy claimed that violence-oriented left-extremists “rise significantly” when the number was literally unchanged and crimes went down nearly 30%. Meanwhile, actual right-wing threat data was manipulated and hidden by him with misleading graphics and deletion of standard threat assessments.

Dobrindt’s willingness to fabricate threats and hide the real ones must serve his electoral interests. Otherwise, what’s the explanation for this threat data nonsense?

I suppose CSU politicians believe they can out right-wing the AfD (Nazi) for votes. The AfD rose five percent since Bavaria’s 2023 state election to 20 percent in current polls. The foundational CSU doctrine (Franz Josef Strauß) has been that “no legitimate party should exist to the right of the CSU.” That opens the door to fabricating left-wing threats and erasing right-wing ones to keep the most radical voters from defecting to AfD (Nazi).

Which brings us to 2026 headlines. His ZDF interview explicitly ruled out Russian involvement in the Berlin blackout before the investigation concluded. He pre-emptively declared “no indications” of Russia while he simultaneously announced he would be expanding surveillance of only the “linksextreme Szene”.

He’s still trying to push a false narrative that the Russian Vulkangruppe is left-wing.

The man who looked at copper and fiber and chose copper. Who looked at 11,200 and 11,200 and saw “significant rise.” Who looked at Russian naming conventions, Cyrillic transliteration errors, and GRU infrastructure attack toolkits and thinks he saw… definitely not the Russians?

Fifteen years of attacks on German infrastructure. Zero arrests. A naming convention that fails every test of German left-wing practice. A GRU contractor called Roman god “Vulkan” cleared for classified work the same year “Vulkangruppe” appeared. And Germany’s Interior Minister declares “no indications” of Russian involvement suspiciously ahead of the actual investigation.

A government that acknowledges GRU attacks on its infrastructure must respond. A government that blames domestic extremists can defer, study, and score political points in a fight with the AfD to out right-wing itself. Dobrindt doesn’t seem to be stupid. He is more likely… well, I guess we’ll find out.

The question isn’t whether Dobrindt even believes his hollow-sounding left-wing accusations. The question is whether Germany can afford an Interior Minister whose entire career has been built on looking for threats that aren’t there, and trying to get others to miss the ones that are.

The word “terrorist” in American political discourse is under transformation from legal category to tribal marker. It now means “enemy” and nothing more.

This isn’t hyperbole. It’s the operational reality of how the designation framework functions under the current administration—and why it functions that way.

The Residue of a “Both Sides” Civil War

The United States has no domestic terrorism statute. No mechanism exists to formally designate purely American organizations as terrorist groups. This isn’t a gap waiting to be filled. It’s a firewall to protect losers of Civil War.

Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) designations unlock specific powers: material support prosecutions, financial sanctions, military authorities. The FTO list made headlines when Trump designated the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. His man-with-too-many-hats Rubio designated Mexican cartels and Tren de Aragua as Foreign Terrorist Organizations and Specially Designated Global Terrorists.

The stated purpose is banking access and law enforcement tools. It’s a lie. Those already existed through money laundering and RICO frameworks.

What FTO designation adds is military authorization language. It is for war. The Trump administration called its relentless bombing of Venezuelan day laborers, killing over 100 in small boats at sea, justified as “War Department” efforts to stop WMD (drugs) being dropped (sold in a market) by terrorists (fishermen).

John Walsh, director for drug policy and the Andes at the Washington Office on Latin America (WOLA), said drug cartels lack the organisation, armaments and political motives to be considered “combatants”. […] “The WMD designation is meant to underscore the administration’s narrative that these are fearsome armies and invading forces that have weapons of mass destruction at their disposal. But again, I think that doesn’t have any basis,” Walsh said. He raised concerns that the designation could be used to “unlock authorities” for the administration to conduct strikes inside the US.

Rubio’s careful phrasing about “imminent threat” and crossing “into our borders” isn’t law enforcement vocabulary. It’s specific authorization-for-force vocabulary to wage wars foreign and domestic on non-combatants without declaring wars, to strategically avoid laws. The designation of TdA, attributed to Maduro’s Venezuela, built the legal fiction for the disproportionately massive military January 2026 invasion that captured one man. No police force in the world, not even America, flies hundreds of planes and strikes critical infrastructure to knock out power to 3 million people, just to serve an arrest warrant on one guy for drugs. “Counterterrorism” and a “war” was spread as propaganda, to upsell from drug enforcement or even regime change. And after kidnapping, the same propaganda machine rapidly deflated its own rhetoric by fraudulently retroactively claiming “police action”, trying to scrub all its pre-invasion war rhetoric.

Meanwhile, the domestic gap stands as a monument to white supremacists, especially those running drugs like the Sacramento cells. The KKK has never been designated. Atomwaffen Division, despite cells across multiple countries, wasn’t designated even when RIM was—because Atomwaffen is in the U.S.; domestic designation would shift statutory interpretations of “foreignness.” The administration designated a little-known Russian organization with no U.S. activity, declared victory against white supremacist terrorism, and left ALL the directly comparable American hate networks untouched.

White Privilege Protection

The KKK isn’t undesignated because of a legal gap. The legal gap exists because the KKK’s ideological descendants hold power.

As I’ve pointed out before, Jefferson Beauregard Sessions the Third was the third generation holding out for Confederate leaders of the Civil War who wanted to destroy the Constitution to preserve slavery.

And Jefferson Beauregard was appointed by Trump, with his overt KKK name and ties front and center to his appointment, as head of the DoJ; the precise institution created by President Grant to destroy the KKK. It would be like the Germans appointing a guy named Hitler Goebbels the Third to read their radio news today. America prevented that absurd turnabout from being possible in a foreign country, while making it the goal at home.

Pete Hegseth was flagged by the military as a threat to the country, so after leaving he covered himself with even more crusader iconography and pushed for war criminal pardons. Those were then deemed by Trump his qualifications to take over the military.

Trump in Charlottesville, “stand back and stand by,” dinner with Nick Fuentes. Stephen Miller. The Proud Boys—pardoned. The Oath Keepers—pardoned. Patriot Front marches openly. The through-line from Klan to current administration isn’t subtle.

It’s the explanation.

Fuentes recently boasted 40% of the White House already are Nazis.

If domestic designation existed, the machinery would eventually point at them. So they keep the domestic gap intact to protect the base, inflate foreign designations for cartels and gangs and whatever serves the news cycle, and ironically use “terrorist” rhetorically against their domestic opponents without legal mechanism.

It’s like how Ronald Reagan as governor of California called himself a gun rights advocate while demanding Blacks have their guns taken away. That man was not subtle about his racism, and he was elected President because of it.

The rhetoric does the work without the legal exposure. Throw chaotic shifting “terrorist” insults at protesters because they differ in political views, treat them as terrorists and murder them at shock troop checkpoints—but never formally designate, because formal designation establishes law and order through records, standards, potential judicial review.

Double Standard Visibility

	Iran Protesters	American Protesters
Deaths	100+ confirmed, 70 bodies to one hospital in single night	30+ dead in custody (2025), citizens shot at checkpoints
Trump response	“If they start killing people”—after killing already documented	Protesters “brainwashed,” resistance to federal forces criminalized
Designation	Iran’s label: “enemy of God”	DHS label: enemy of State “terrorists”
Consequence	Justifies military intervention	Justifies blackout, no investigation

Iranian deaths are being used to justify a military action long desired. American deaths are being ignored as inconvenient—information to suppress because acknowledging them would expose the administration puts over half of America Last based on race.

Trump’s “if they start killing people” rhetoric after Iran has been killing hundreds of people performs the same function as the loose FTO designations. It creates a false starting point from which all subsequent action appears reactive. Future military action is being staged now as a false “response” rather than aggression.

Historical Through-Line

Ruby Ridge (1992): Federal agents kill white separatist’s wife and son. Two deaths. Congressional hearings. Settlements. Cited for three decades as proof of federal tyranny. The militia movement builds its entire persecution narrative around it. It’s been the canonical NRA story for why everyone needs to open-carry assault rifles with banana clips and prepare weekly for violent response to federal agents.

January 6 (2021): Coordinated political violence to overturn election. Cops beaten. Capitol breached. Textbook domestic terrorism by any behavioral definition. Pardoned. Families compensated. Participants in unprovoked violence against federal agents called “patriots” and “political prisoners.”

2025-26 Reversal: American civilians shot to death at checkpoints. Killed in custody. One ICE agent texted after shooting a Chicago woman: “I fired 5 shots and she had 7 holes. Put that in your book boys.” No hearings. No settlements. No investigation. No Ruby Ridge invocations.

The math: 2 dead produced decades of outrage and congressional action, a template for resisting federal agents or worse. Now 30+ dead in Trump custody produces silence. 4+ shot by Trump’s agents produces “put that in your book.”

Ruby Ridge was held up to warn government will kill citizens. That was supposed to be the thing that justified decades of anti-federal organizing and militancy. Now the Ruby Ridge types are the federal government, and they are doing the killing, and the lesson… evaporates. The outrage was never about freedom for citizens. It was about government killing specific citizens.

Friend/Enemy

Carl Schmitt, the Nazi jurist, defined politics as the distinction between friend and enemy. The terrorist designation framework now operates on exactly this principle.

January 6 was terrorism defined: coordinated, politically motivated, violent, aimed at influencing government. But they’re being reclassified as our terrorists, so they’re treated as patriots.

Protesters opposing extrajudicial execution by federal shock troops are their people, so… they’re treated as terrorists without any designation—because that designation would mean a legal process, and legal process might produce accountability in a regime that operates instead like dictatorship.

Foreign protesters get “God-given rights to freedom.” Domestic protesters get shot by God-given bullets at random checkpoints.

Same acts. Opposite designations. Based entirely on tribal membership.

The American treatment of the word “terrorist” is now pure friend/enemy marker to curate white power. The legal architecture exists to formalize that marking against foreign targets, for purposes of asset seizure, while protecting domestic allies from ever facing the same machinery for asset capture and hoarding. The asymmetry is the design.