Who Signed the Arday Lynching Letter Defending Cofnas?

Racist disinformation 101 time.

A new poisonous “freedom” letter demonstrates that its drafters constructed a description of a racist case with the racial dimension removed, addressed to a rector who had spent March publicly handling exactly that.

The drafters knew what they were doing by generating such racist disinformation letter and amassing signatories.

Whoever wrote “publicizing academic misconduct” as a complete account made a calculated choice to hide the racism.

Ghent tied the suspension to his public statements about Arday and to limits on academic freedom that protect the rights of others, then magically sealed the specific charges behind personnel confidentiality. How ironic.

But then Cofnas named the charge himself: discrimination. He says he is charged with a thing the “open” letter hides from view.

His account is the only one on record, and Ghent has let it stand ever since. The suspension came August 20. Three days of international coverage, no correction from the university. The drafters read that record and carefully deleted the part that matters most, the racist hounding that ended with a man dead at 41. We still wait on the coroner’s file. The family says the campaign was too much for him. Simon Baron-Cohen, in contact with Arday hours before his death, told the BBC he “felt he couldn’t go on.”

A lynching.

Which is worse, knowingly being racist or knowingly failing to be anti-racist?

Source: The Keys, Una. M. Marson, The League of Coloured Peoples, July 1933.

Every signatory of that lynching letter had the racial dimension available in a week of international coverage of a man’s death, and signed a version without it anyway.

That’s culpable at minimum as negligence, and the letter is engineered so negligent signers and knowing signers produce identical signatures, which means the second group artificially expands the first with a laundering move of disinformation.

Shame on every person on this list. They should be handled as racist until they prove otherwise.

Measure Count Share of 449
Male (name-based estimate) 385 86%
Female (name-based estimate) 57 13%
US and UK affiliations 235 52%
Current Ghent University affiliation 3 0.7%
Any Belgian affiliation 11 2%
Emeritus, retired, or former positions 39 9%
Independent, unaffiliated, or private 24 5%
PhD students and candidates 20 4%
Field in self-listed title Count
Economics, finance, management 47
Physics, mathematics, statistics, computer science 44
Philosophy 38
Psychology, neuroscience, genetics 23
Law 15
Sociology and criminology 8
Education 3
Institution Signatories
University of Oxford 14
London School of Economics 12
University College London 6
Harvard University 5
Queen Mary University of London 5
University of Buckingham 5
George Mason University 4
King’s College London 4
University of Edinburgh 4
City St George’s, University of London 4

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.