The Tesla CEO strives to seduce people with false promises, urging them to fall in love with his failures — a twisted and addictive infatuation — to divert their attention from the multitude of healthier and more rewarding market alternatives.

At its core, Tesla remains a fraudulent enterprise that originated from a questionable appropriation of an Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM), harboring aspirations of mass production for a Los Angeles-made electric TZero performance car.

In 1997, a plethora of American electric cars existed (later extinguished during President Bush’s tenure), just as they did in 1977 (later eliminated during President Reagan’s administration). Hence, it should come as no surprise that in 2007, any electric car company would build upon previous work.

However, the TZero, distinctive in its own right, received significant updates in 2003. Its specifications from two decades ago bear a striking resemblance to what Tesla continues to rely upon today. Everything Tesla does appears to stem from the groundwork laid by the 2003 TZero—a fact that requires little explanation.

One of the original founders of Tesla — Martin Eberhard — was known as “Mr. Tesla” (and technically still is). When Elon Musk injected his tainted funds (obtained through questionable means from the quasi-legal money laundering of PayPal) into Mr. Tesla’s new venture, not only did he brazenly appropriate the founder’s popularized name, but he also took ruthless control and insisted on being regarded as the company’s true founder (despite everyone knowing otherwise).

After its takeover by Musk, Tesla just shamelessly pilfered ideas, making it an egregiously flawed enterprise built upon an unsound foundation.

Over the course of a decade, Tesla continually exaggerated its capabilities, making audacious statements about a future that never materialized. Remember when they claimed a driver wouldn’t be necessary? It was all lies upon lies.

By 2016, I could discern that Tesla posed a significant threat to many individuals and I gave many public warnings. Yet, the company’s fraudulence attracted countless people lacking the expertise in safety engineering required to protect themselves or hundreds of others from harm (even preserve their own lives).

Tesla owes its existence to fraud.

The absence of meaningful innovation from Tesla since 2013 can be attributed to this deception. Astonishingly, owning and operating a TZero manufactured in Los Angeles two decades ago is a more prudent choice in 2023 compared to any Tesla vehicle. This is unusual within the realm of electric cars, as other brands have pursued genuine innovation guided by ethical engineering expertise.

Nissan, undoubtedly. Volvo, certainly. Mercedes, of course. Ford, verily. GM, a world of difference. Kia, Hyundai… admit it, Tesla doesn’t even warrant consideration.

Since the introduction of the Model S in 2012, Tesla has failed to undergo a complete vehicle redesign. Their grand promises to swiftly bring concepts to market have been repeatedly hampered by extensive delays.

Allegedly, individuals who pre-ordered the reissued original Roadster in 2017 have endured nearly five years of waiting without any glimmer of hope. And if and when the Truck ever reaches the market, it might not even meet street legal requirements and will likely be deemed a total loss even in minor accidents. Poorly conceived ideas compounded by even worse execution over time.

Long ago, the CEO was exposed as a serial fabricator who appropriated the work of others and claimed it as his own. His hasty assemblage of components, concealed beneath layers of shameless self-promotion, yields diminishing value as he continues to recklessly churn out subpar products.

It’s akin to a boy submitting someone else’s homework, arguing that it would benefit them more if he received the credit. Naturally, such an approach fails to produce genuine innovations over time, let alone establish a reliable pipeline.

Purchasing a new Tesla becomes increasingly illogical as we distance ourselves from 2003, unlike other brands that have made significant strides. Older Teslas align more closely with the original ideas conceived by intelligent individuals who abandoned the company long ago, replaced by desperate and silent souls.

Hundreds of brand-new Teslas have been reported with minimal mileage on the odometer, destined for the junkyard. Regrettably, seduced owners find themselves burned to death, unaware of the peril concealed beneath the seductive facade. No one should accept this state of failure, especially for a vehicle that the CEO fraudulently and angrily proclaimed to be the safest on the road, deceiving unwitting buyers into a perilous existence.

Do you think Frank Abagnale ever truly achieved what he claimed or fulfilled his promises? Of course not. A criminal who employs seduction to artificially enhance his wealth and status for a pump-and-dump lifestyle cannot provide what others genuinely require. Those who invested their time or money became his victims.

The Tesla CEO will never deliver an improved Autopilot for the same reason Abagnale could never become a skilled pilot.

Fabrications about vehicle safety demand unequivocal rejection. Yet, Tesla has been permitted to cause repeated crashes resulting in passenger fatalities, all while fraudulently asserting that they will save lives if only allowed to continue their lethal endeavors.

Do you see the issue? Frank Abagnale was incarcerated for his petty frauds, so why has Elon Musk evaded punishment for his dangerous ones?

Given this background, it becomes evident that Tesla fails to present any compelling reasons to purchase their vehicles.

Are you concerned about range?

Range can be considered a safety feature, alleviating fears of power depletion.

Look at these high-end models.

Lucid Air: 516-mile range
Mercedes EQS 450+: 422-mile range
Tesla Model S: 405-mile range

Look at these lower-end models.

Hyundai Ioniq 6: 361-mile range
Tesla Model 3 Long Range: 353-mile range

Apparently, labeling a car “long range” does not guarantee an extended range. Tesla lacks innovation in this regard, and to compound matters, they grossly overstate and misrepresent their range, while nearly every other car brand underestimates it.

Tesla’s estimated range inaccuracy was worse than VW’s dieselgate, an intentional deception with real-world harms. A Tesla engineer leaked that software engineers purposely wrote code to falsely show its “advertised” range when the vehicle had a full charge. Once charge reached 50 percent the software would begin to show a more accurate mileage estimate to try and warn owners they were about to be dead in the water.

Massive “range-drop” was intended behavior by Tesla. A calculated lie to game the system. On top of this, Tesla setup service and call centers designed to cover-up the “range-drop” with gaslighting tactics.

Fraud, once again.

Is quality important to you?

I believe this requires no further elaboration, does it?

Tesla has gained notoriety for its abysmal quality, with steering wheels detaching, suspensions failing, and spontaneous combustion resulting in billowing smoke and toxic fires.

Even China ranked Tesla’s quality as inadequate.

China.

Ill-fitting panels, shoddy paint applications… the litany of quality failures stretches on indefinitely. Siemens, leaders in manufacturing, subtly hinted that Tesla possesses zero understanding of building factories, a fact made abundantly clear by their output.

Expect at least two significant defects in every new Tesla vehicle, with recalls nearing 60! Instead, maybe opt for an aging Yugo as you’ll find more satisfaction and fewer problems.

A new Tesla embodies the kind of numbers one would anticipate from a company that has never manufactured cars before or one operating under a dictatorial regime, where complaints about quality are viewed as direct assaults on the insecure and apprehensive leader.

Are you intrigued by cutting-edge technology?

The most groundbreaking advancements come from companies like Mobileye and NVidia, both of whom severed ties with Tesla long ago due to grave ethical concerns.

When NVidia ranked all car brands based on their contributions to automotive tech, Tesla emerged as the obvious laggard. Seriously, what have they accomplished in a decade, while their innovations resemble the vision of an elderly blind man wearing a paper bag over his head?

Mercedes achieved driverless feats decades ago, feats that Tesla still cannot replicate. Nissan achieved low-cost, high-volume, mass-market EV sales long before Tesla.

Anyone who closely observes Tesla eventually realizes that their implementations are half-baked fabrications that deteriorate over time. “Fart” mode? “Christmas” lights? These are the whimsical endeavors of inexperienced individuals lacking real-life expertise, unable to leverage the privileges bestowed upon them.

They are merely reenacting past amusements, clumsily fumbling with tools invented by others, tools they scarcely comprehend.

Years before Tesla even broached the topic, I observed frequent software updates and over-the-air patches with Italian motorcycles. Once again, Tesla took credit for a woeful implementation of others’ work, resulting in updates that are now synonymous with regression flaws. In certain cases, it might even be necessary to block Tesla updates, as their hasty coding endeavors only degrade the performance of their vehicles.

Giant touchscreens were an ill-conceived notion rooted in laziness and cost-cutting measures, contributing to decreased safety and an upswing in accidents.

Furthermore, their keyless entry system has proven to be easily compromised, even unintentionally (the absolute nadir of safety). Meanwhile, their door handles fail regularly during normal operation and, most critically, in emergencies, leaving occupants trapped and vulnerable to death by fire.

In essence, if we applied genuine engineering principles akin to those in the aerospace industry, Tesla failures would result in it being permanently grounded.

No one would dare fly such fraud.

Aerospace adheres to rigorous standards of measured performance and care, irrespective of proclamations of love.

Plus, Tesla is horribly racist.

Love, but verify.