Every news outlet I’m seeing says the same basic thing. The Supreme Court, injected with right-wing activist justices, are actively working to end representative government.
“Today’s decision in Trump v. Slaughter takes a wrecking ball to a 90-year pillar of American law,” said House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Jamie Raskin. The US Supreme Court on Monday upheld President Donald Trump’s firing of Federal Trade Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter, overturning 90 years of precedent and giving the chief executive what dissenting Justice Sonia Sotomayor called “a power unknown even to the English Crown against which the Founders revolted.” […] Chief Justice John Roberts joined fellow conservative Justices… appointed by Trump… [to rule that] independent executive agencies ‘exercise the president’s power, not their own, and thus must be responsible to him’.
Read that twice. Independent agencies can not be independent because that would enable them to be independent.
It’s the literal statement of a king governance model, ending rule of law. The king doesn’t follow the laws, which would require he only fire people for violating those laws (e.g. Constitutional loyalty). The Supreme Court says the executive (e.g. King) is the law, and everyone exercises his power by definition and can’t be independent, so anyone he fires is at his arbitrary and improvised discretion.
Is this a surprise from Roberts?
I’ve written before that he was promoted to the Supreme Court seat because he was the guy who told President Reagan to suppress CDC science on AIDS transmission and let hundreds of thousands of Americans die from intentional executive indecision.
The documented record on Roberts (his 1985 memo to Fred Fielding) proves he advised deleting the CDC’s truthful statement from Reagan’s briefing materials, removing the line saying AIDS was not transmitted through casual contact. He recommended the President generate confusion on what he called a “disputed scientific issue,” despite the CDC having already published its conclusion two weeks earlier that there was no dispute. Reagan’s press conference then ran Roberts’ propaganda, sowing doubt rather than relaying the science.
So, no, not really a surprise that the same justice who says we must rush to end democracy was the guy who said the President must slow down and wait on warnings about a deadly disease. Roberts has one consistent principle: the executive should be unchecked and the public unprotected. That is his record, and it is the exact reason the GOP wanted him on the bench. In better times his disloyalty to the Constitution would be called seditious, for wielding state power to destroy the structure that checks state power.
