Category Archives: Security

Hegseth vs. Harvard: How Nazi Gleichschaltung Turned Top Berlin University into Humboldt

1933, Adolf Hitler appointed racist Eugen Fischer the Director of Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Berlin to remove “globalists” and “radical” thinkers (Jews)
Hegseth Attacks Harvard Like a 1933 Nazi Would: How Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Berlin Was Forced to Rename Humboldt

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced Friday, in a move historians will easily recognize, that the Pentagon is severing all military training, fellowships, and certificate programs with a targeted university. His reasoning deserves to be read carefully:

…heads full of globalist and radical ideologies that do not improve our fighting ranks.

This particular brand of rhetorical fear-mongering carries a well-known slogan of Nazis.

Hegseth… holds Nazi-like views on Muslims. He makes Donald Rumsfeld look like Mahatma Gandhi. He should not be anywhere near power, even if every single one of the behavioral allegations against him was proven conclusively false. … It is fair to say that if Hegseth said any of the things about Judaism that he says about Islam, it would be transparently obvious that he held neo-Nazi beliefs that could easily justify genocide. But there is a double standard on the treatment of the two religions, so that one can get away with horrific comments about Muslims that would (rightly) be career-ruining if spoken about Jewish people. He specifically says that the very presence of Muslims in a society is harmful.

Well, here we are. Globalist means Jews. His sentence has a precise historical precedent, and it isn’t subtle.

And just to be clear, Hegseth is self-loathing in the worst possible way. While he was at Harvard he wrote papers and worked his political ties like this:

“Ensuring low-income and minority children have the same opportunities as more affluent majority students is an essential goal and worth pursuing with vigor and substantial investment,” Hegseth wrote, according to The Boston Globe. “Our country and state must strive for equal opportunity for all, regardless of race, class, geography, or gender.”

Hegseth also wrote that closing racial achievement gaps is a “laudable goal,” and advocated for cooperation with state lawmaker Melissa Hortman, a Democrat who had been vocal on education, The Boston Globe reports.

Hortman and her husband were assassinated in their home three months ago. Their murders, which authorities called “politically motivated,” received little attention from the current administration.

Hegseth at Harvard wrote papers with Hortman advocating for minority opportunity. Then Hortman was assassinated by a man using a hit list of Democrats. Hegseth running militant machinery of state is targeting the institution where that collaboration happened, using language that labels the values they shared as contamination.

That’s the convert pattern known as a Nazi Heidegger move. The person inside who uses the institution’s value to destroy it anyway is more useful to Nazis than someone who never valued it at all.

Also, “received little attention” framing totally undersells what actually happened. Trump didn’t ignore the assassination of a lawmaker that Hegseth drew attention to, he reposted conspiracy theories calling it a false flag trying to implicate their political foe Governor Walz. That’s not inattention, it’s active disinformation for exploitation. The administration weaponized a political assassination into a false narrative advantage. That’s far, far worse than neglect.

That’s information warfare.

Trump Playbook

In 1933, the Nazi regime began its “anti-woke” equivalent of Gleichschaltung — the “coordination” of institutions under state ideological control. Universities were important targets. The mechanism wasn’t violent because it could be administrative: funding cuts, loyalty requirements, the dismissal of faculty deemed ideologically unreliable, and the replacement of independent education with regime-aligned formation.

The regime never framed their imposition as imposing their ideology. Like with Hegseth today, all of it was framed as removing ideology, purging “globalists” (Jewish physics) and “radical” (cosmopolitan) influence. It called Germans “un-German” in order to claim institutions suddenly had been “captured.” The regime radically shifted the political narrative in order to falsely announce itself, on the extreme right, as a neutral position. Independent thought, let alone anything except the most extreme loyalty to the dictator, was branded contamination.

Read Hegseth’s statement again. Harvard is “radical.” As if renaming the War Department is not. Officers return “globalist” as if contaminated by Jews. Hegseth treats non-white, non-Christian, members of society as the source of unapproved thoughts. The rhetorical structure is identical between Nazi Germany and Trump America.

The Loading Sequence

The Nazi coordination of universities followed a specific order:

Nazi Gleichschaltung Trump/Hegseth vs Harvard
Ideological demands framed as correcting institutional bias Demands framed as correcting antisemitism
Financial leverage applied to force compliance Billions in federal funding cut
Escalating penalties for defiance Financial penalties doubled to $1 billion for noncompliance
Severing state personnel from independent educational institutions Military education severed
Threats extended to peer institutions “Similar programs at other Ivy League universities will be evaluated in coming weeks”

That’s not a rough parallel. It’s the precise playbook in the same order.

The Targeting

The Nazis targeted Friedrich Wilhelm University in Berlin, for example. It was Germany’s most prestigious institution, the intellectual crown jewel. It was attacked early and visibly. Not because it was an offender at all but because forcing capitulation would signal to every lesser institution what was expected. Berlin’s compliance meant resistance elsewhere was pointless.

Harvard serves exactly the same Nazi targeting function. Every university president in America is watching what happens to an institution that says no. The bully lesson is being taught in public: Constitutional principles mean death, obey Trump or die because if you’re dead you didn’t obey.

Germany Failed Because of This

The self-inflicted damage from Nazi purges is the most thoroughly documented case of ideological stupidity producing strategic catastrophe in modern history. Even more than Stalin. Even more than Mao. Hegseth is getting into a long line of dictator purge idiocy.

The physicists driven from German universities such as Leo Szilard, Edward Teller, Hans Bethe, James Franck, Eugene Wigner, John von Neumann went directly to the Manhattan Project and built the atomic bomb for the Allies.

Ernst Boris Chain, a Jewish biochemist who fled Berlin in 1933, co-developed penicillin at Oxford. Countless German soldiers died of the infections that Allied soldiers survived because of the U.S. Army “globalist” strategy.

Germany collapsed rapidly from the world’s leading scientific nation to forever second-tier. In a single generation the Nazis wrecked the nation permanently. The countries that absorbed its expelled talent rose rapidly. America abruptly jumped to the dominant superpower for the next century, thanks to the enemies of Hegseth.

When the Nazi Education Minister asked mathematician David Hilbert whether the University of Göttingen had suffered from the departure of Jewish colleagues, Hilbert replied:

Suffered? It hasn’t suffered. It simply no longer exists.

Does American defense strategy even exist anymore? Rebranding of “war” and statements about war crimes and resource extraction being execution of Trump’s demands, suggests… nope.

“The War Department” was officially retired in 1947 when it became the Department of Defense. a deliberate signal that America’s military served a strategic purpose instead of just starting wars. Hitler was famous for reversion. The Nazi flag used colors of past empire, with a Swastika symbolizing its past racism. Reversion was the entire message.

Hegseth’s reversion is a tell. He’s not interested in the institutional framework that won World War Two and then the Cold War. He’s interested in a military that defines itself by the kind of ideological obedience that lost by 1942 and then spun up the worst of the Holocaust while losing more and more. Soldiers will be educated exclusively in institutions the executive controls to expedite losing, like the rush to kill hundreds of thousands of people in concentration camps in the last days before their liberation.

Officers who went to Harvard and started “looking too much like Harvard” are officers who might think and act with intelligence. That’s the actual fear of Trump.

Return to Sender

Hegseth earned his master’s degree from Harvard. In 2022, performing for Fox News cameras, he wrote “Return to Sender” on his diploma with a marker and symbolically returned it. His office resurfaced the clip this week.

It’s a theme commonly used by Nazis. Go back. You don’t belong. Return to where you are “from”. Raus, raus!

The Nazis had a term for intellectuals who turned against the institutions that formed them and used state power to destroy them. They were considered the most valuable converts, as proof that even the enemy’s best products recognized the regime’s superiority.

Friedrich Wilhelm University was eventually renamed Humboldt University, because the institution that existed under that name had been so thoroughly compromised by Nazis that postwar Germany needed to signal a break from what it had become. More precisely, Nazis said the professors of Friedrich Wilhelm University were “geistiges Leibregiment der Hohenzollern” (intellectual bodyguard regiment of monarchs and dictators), exactly what Hegseth wants to build. This is not coincidence.

“Beneath the gowns, the mustiness of 1000 years”. 1960s University of Hamburg student protests. Source: DW

The Humboldt name was chosen specifically because Wilhelm von Humboldt stood for Freiheit der Wissenschaft (freedom of science) and the postwar consensus was that a university serving Hegseth-like concepts of an intellectual arm of state power had to be symbolically destroyed to protect democracy.

Hegseth is writing “Return to Sender” on American higher education with the full weight of the Nazi Gleichschaltung behind the marker.

The question is whether the American understands what’s being returned, and what is lost when it’s gone.

Related: Military commanders are forcing troops to watch “Melania” as a loyalty test.

The commander in question allegedly wore red MAGA hats and “made it very clear” his position regarding those who do not support the administration. He reportedly designated the documentary screening as one of three mandatory monthly unit activity events designed to strengthen military unit cohesion.

Navy Secretary John Phelan and His Six-Hour Epstein Underaged Girl Tube

Secretary of the Navy John Phelan was listed on a March 3, 2006 flight manifest for Jeffrey Epstein’s Boeing 727, traveling from Luton, London to JFK. The flight-manifest-march-3-2006, released by the House Oversight Committee, is document HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_007300.

The private jet flight lasted six hours and forty-seven minutes. It’s not something you accidentally step on, or go without a reason. The Jeffrey Epstein manifest shows six men with six redactions:

  1. Jean-Luc Brunel — the French modeling agent whose documented role in Epstein’s operation was procuring underage girls, and who was found hanged in a Paris prison cell in 2022 while awaiting trial for rape of minors.
  2. Jimmy Cayne, then-CEO of Bear Stearns just before its total collapse, who died in 2021.
  3. Theodore Serure, a New York broker repeatedly in legal trouble.
  4. Brian Higgins, NY congressman.
  5. Craig Overlander, fixed income salesman of Bear Stearns.
  6. John Phelan.

Six other names, next to these men on the manifest, had to be redacted to protect them. The Department of Justice explains the redactions in these documents as “largely used to protect the names of victims and other identifying information.

Six named men. Six redacted names. That’s an escort pattern of Brunel.

A private 727 with a convicted sex trafficker and his primary recruiter of underage girls, flying from one of his primary sourcing cities to New York.

Phelan of course declined to comment.

CNN wants us to know that a “close friend” said Jimmy Cayne had invited Phelan, that Phelan didn’t know it would be Epstein’s plane until he arrived, and that after he boarded anyway with Brunel, Epstein and six redacted “victims”… during the entire flight Epstein only pitched “a tax concept”, which Phelan “had no interest in.”

A tax concept. For six hours. In a sealed tube over the Atlantic. We are being forced to guess why he was too busy with other matters to be interested.

Anyone who has investigated crimes of big corporate America recognizes this story instantly. The private jet, as a controlled environment for sexual access to young women, is not an Epstein invention. This is an executive perk of a long institutional history of misogynistic abuse.

The mechanics are always the same: a sealed environment with no exit, no outside witnesses, a crushing power asymmetry, and a business reason for everyone being there. Think about what Phelan reveals through his friend’s statement: no data before getting on the plane, then a dumb tax concept, and can’t get away from it for six hours. Trapped.

That’s a confession, a projection of the entrapment scheme for underaged girls. If Phelan couldn’t get out how could they?

The young women are always young “staff” or “assistants” or “models” or, in this case, names that had to be redacted to protect them. There is always a meeting, always a pitch, always a thin legitimate purpose that explains why everyone was in a locked tube together. The business reason is not the point. The business reason is the thing you say afterward for why you couldn’t escape.

“Tax concept” as cover story machinery shows that it is still operating. No one gets on a plane let alone flies over six hours on a private 727 to hear a tax pitch they have no interest in. But “tax concept” is exactly the kind of explanation that gets generated when someone needs a reason — any reason — for why six names are redacted. It has the specific vagueness of a story constructed after the fact: detailed enough to sound like something, empty enough to be unverifiable. Epstein pitched a concept. Phelan wasn’t interested in that concept. That is not a memory. That is a curated press statement.

And you don’t need a six hour sealed private meeting to pitch tax ideas to people who have direct access to a member of Congress.

The invitation came from Jimmy Cayne, who is dead.

The host was Jeffrey Epstein, who is dead by suspicious “suicide”.

The recruiter aboard was Jean-Luc Brunel, who is dead by suspicious “suicide”.

People positioned to confirm or deny the circumstances are either deceased, redacted, or hiding behind that anonymous “close friend.”

The CNN reporter emphasizes “there is no evidence Phelan knew of any wrongdoing.” This does not mean evidence of innocence. It’s the opposite, that evidence of guilt has not been made public yet. It is a statement about the state of disclosure, not about what happened.

What the manifest establishes is simpler than any cover story: John Phelan chose to get into a tube with Brunel and Epstein and remain on a private aircraft for over sex hours with sex individuals whose identities required legal protection. Sorry, I meant six and six. The redaction pattern says who they were. The passenger ratio says why they were there.

Donald Trump, the primary name in the Epstein Files, nominated Phelan for Secretary of the Navy in November 2024, calling him a man who “excelled in every endeavor.” Presumably he includes this file. The Senate confirmed him in March 2025.

He now oversees the United States Navy.

No one has asked Phelan, on the record, who the six redacted passengers were. No one has asked him what happened during those six hours and forty-seven minutes beyond a tax pitch. No one has asked him why every corroborating witness is conveniently dead.

The manifest is out. Six men, six redacted, six hours. How can this be anything other than six? Oops, I meant sex.

The silence is deafening.

Your Power: Why Billie Eilish is Right About ICE

Billie Eilish used 30 seconds of her own earned platform to state a historical fact and object to state violence.

That’s it. She said the truth. She was right.

That’s all that happened.

And then an entire apparatus run by old white men started spinning up to attack her and make that simple act suffer a million cuts.

When Billie Eilish said “no one is illegal on stolen land” at the 2026 Grammys, the radical right-wing media machine didn’t engage with what she actually said. It started an expensive intelligence operation to make her personal life the story and distract from the crimes of ICE.

A NY Post article, for example, is textbook disinformation. It avoids telling outright lies because instead it uses deliberate reframing, selective application, and manufactured consensus.

Ricky Gervais is arguably who opened the door for attack, feeding radical right disinformation operatives. While Gervais is known for being political and frequently boasting about his celebrity pulpit to push his political agenda, he loudly announced “celebrities should shut up about politics” if they aren’t him.

The right-wing media took the Gervais opening to dispense enforcement. Understanding how this works frame by frame is essential to recognizing it in real time:

Frame How It Works
1. Permission Structure
Celebrity Silencing
Gervais posts his 2020 Golden Globes clip telling celebrities not to make political speeches. Gateway Pundit and right-wing outlets amplify immediately. This establishes the baseline rule: famous people speaking against power is illegitimate. But Gervais himself uses every available platform for political advocacy on animal rights, atheism, and free speech. The rule only applies to causes he doesn’t care about.
2. Target Selection
Attack the White Ally
Bad Bunny gave the more substantive speech, won Album of the Year, and is headlining the Super Bowl. But the NY Post runs Eilish as the main target because she’s a young white woman — easier to frame as naive, out of touch, and performative. Attacking Bad Bunny directly validates his point. You can’t call a Puerto Rican man ungrateful for objecting to his community being called “animals” without proving exactly what he’s describing. So they go around him.
3. Deliberate Misreading
Weaponized Literalism
“Stolen land” is a political term describing the historical fact of colonization and the moral illegitimacy of a state built on displacement claiming authority to declare who “belongs.” The right strips this of political meaning and treats it as a literal real estate claim — as if Eilish said “I personally have no right to my house.” The actual argument: the system of sovereignty that calls human beings “illegal” is itself founded on illegitimate seizure. That’s a critique of a framework, not a deed transfer request.
4. Impossible Demand
Personal Sacrifice Test
“Hand over your mansion then.” Takes a systemic critique and demands individual material sacrifice as proof of sincerity. The demand is absurd by design — no individual giving up a house undoes colonization. But it makes the speaker look hypocritical for not doing something nobody asked them to do. This is the tactic used against every systemic critic in history. “You criticize capitalism but you own a phone.” It’s designed to make systemic critique impossible by requiring every critic to first personally exit the system they’re critiquing.
5. Selective Application
Rules for Thee
Senator Mike Lee says anyone making a stolen land acknowledgment should “immediately give his or her land to native Americans.” But Lee is a US Senator — he exercises sovereignty over stolen land professionally. He legislates on it. His entire authority derives from it. The standard is never applied to the people who wield actual state power over stolen land. Only to the 24-year-old singer who mentioned it. Gervais’s £14.5 million mansion never gets the photo spread treatment either.
6. Property as Disqualification
Wealth Resentment Engineering
Four photos of Eilish’s house. Her horse paddock. Her ranch. Price tags on everything. The article inventories her wealth not to make an argument but to generate resentment. Implicit logic: if you’re wealthy, your moral claims are invalid. This frame is only activated against people whose politics the outlet opposes. Trump lives in a golden tower and claims to speak for the working class — no property photo spreads from the NY Post. Gervais is richer than Eilish — no photo spreads when he makes political statements.
7. Subject Disappearance
Story Replacement
The article is 400+ words. “ICE” appears only in Eilish’s own quoted speech. Zero reporting on what ICE is doing. Zero mention of deportations, raids, or the communities being targeted. The article exists to make the story “rich celebrity says dumb thing.” The actual story: federal agents are terrorizing communities. People have died. Eilish becomes the controversy so ICE doesn’t have to be. The messenger replaces the message.
8. Manufactured Consensus
Coalition Coordination
Random X user, right-wing YouTuber (Brandon Tatum), British journalist (Julia Hartley-Brewer), US Senator (Mike Lee) — all quoted making the same argument within hours. By the time a reader sees the article, “hand over your house” looks like common sense because multiple apparently independent sources say it. This is a standard rapid-response cycle: influencers generate the frame, media amplifies, elected officials legitimize. It’s not organic consensus — it’s coordinated narrative construction.
9. Gendered Diminishment
Infantilization
“Blithering idiot.” “Sis, hand over the keys.” The language specifically diminishes along gender lines. Eilish is treated as a naive girl who doesn’t understand what she’s saying. Bad Bunny said something more politically substantive and directly connected to his own community. Nobody called him a blithering idiot. The framing infantilizes Eilish to make the dismissal feel natural and justified.
10. Manufactured Indigenous Opposition
Ventriloquism
Fox News Digital contacts the Tongva tribe specifically about Eilish’s property, soliciting a response. Headlines run as “Native American tribe responds” and “tribe calls out” — framing it as Indigenous pushback validating the hypocrisy charge white conservatives invented. What the tribe actually said: they “value the instance when Public Figures provide visibility to the true history of this country,” reached out to Eilish “to express our appreciation for her comments,” and partnered with the Recording Academy to author the official Land Acknowledgment at the Grammys. The tribe is being used as a prop in a gotcha game they didn’t initiate and don’t endorse.

The aggregate effect of all these disinformation frames working together is singular: make it as costly as possible for anyone to say what Eilish said.

This is an information war being waged by Trump.

And in this specific battle a full-scale Trump operation is running to shut down the voice of American freedom by swarming anyone who dares to support it.

The next celebrity who considers speaking against ICE crimes now has to calculate whether they’re willing to have their house investigated, their wealth inventoried, their intelligence questioned, and their words deliberately misrepresented by a sitting senator.

A risk calculus is the point. It’s not about winning an argument with Billie Eilish. It’s about making her look as vulnerable as possible, as attacked as possible, in order to silence the next person.

It is specifically why allies are the target. If you can intimidate the powerful white celebrities into silence, the non-white artists are being isolated and left alone, making them easier for right-wing media to dismiss as “identity politics” or “grievance culture” rather than a broad coalition objecting to state violence.

Gervais serves as Frame 1. He uses celebrity political speech to supply the self-contradicting premise that celebrities have no right to political speech. He doesn’t execute the rest of the operation himself and he doesn’t need to. He opens the door and the attack hordes of the NY Post, Gateway Pundit, Turning Point USA, and every right-wing influencer walk through his gap. His political “don’t be political” clip is the permission structure. Everything else is enforcement.

Now look hard again at what’s totally absent. In all of the coverage about the Gervais post, the NY Post article, the influencer pile-on, the senator’s tweet… not one word engages with the substance of what any Grammy winner actually said.

Not one word about ICE.

Got ICE?

Not one word about deportation.

Not one word about the people being called animals and publicly executed.

The silence on the substance, and the silence forced on those who speak the truth, is the entire strategy.

It’s why “Melania” isn’t really a movie at all, it’s a denial of service attack on the film industry to prevent anyone from speaking the truth again.

Florida Weaponized Candy for DeSantis’ Wife to Become Governor

Florida dropped a disinformation bomb from their “Healthy Florida First” platform, which says eating six Jolly Ranchers in a year could poison your child.

It’s total bullshit.

Look, I’m not going to defend candy. Anyone who knows me knows I can’t stand the stuff. I haven’t touched a piece in decades and I think the industry is nuts.

But reading this Florida report that a single box of Nerds exceeds the “safe annual arsenic exposure” for a kid by roughly 20 times, throws more red flags than a Chinese military parade.

This is radical political campaign literature thinly dressed in an evil lab coat. Two and a half Snickers bars per year is the line between safety and cancer?

GTFO. Anyone reprinting or spreading this stuff needs to know what’s actually going on here.

As a disinformation historian, allow me to explain this has nothing to do with candy and everything to do with political extremists undermining elections.

The Pitch

On January 26, the Florida Department of Health released a two-page PDF through ExposingFoodToxins.com that claims 28 of 46 candy products contained arsenic “at elevated levels.”

Governor Ron DeSantis with his First Lady Casey DeSantis, flanked by the discredited Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo, held a press conference at The Villages. Why there? It’s Florida’s largest retirement community and one of its most politically steeped Republican strongholds. They announced fraud to an audience that would never challenge the obviousness of it.

The document was curated for maximum viral impact by placing product photos alongside scary red numbers, consumption limits so low they’re absurd, and the word “arsenic” on repeat. Arsenic. Arsenic. Arsenic.

It does not include any methodology, there’s no peer review, it has no source data, no laboratory identification, no confidence intervals, or sample sizes per product.

Come on people.

None of the basic scientific documentation that would allow independent verification is in the release because none of it is real. Florida’s Department of Health was asked for clarification by multiple sources and so far there has been no update.

The Fraud

They tested for the wrong thing.

This lab used EPA Method 6010D, which measures total arsenic. That means they looked at organic and inorganic combined, despite organic arsenic being relatively harmless and found widely in food.

Inorganic arsenic is the dangerous kind. Without speciation testing, all the numbers are scientifically meaningless for assessing health risk.

Florida of course knows this. Every toxicologist of course knows this. Here’s what was pumped into a retirement community to juice political activism:

  • Fabricated benchmarks: The “safe” annual consumption limits don’t correspond to any federal regulatory standard or peer-reviewed threshold for candy. The FDA has no arsenic action level for confectionery. Florida invented its own, didn’t explain the derivation, and didn’t subject it to review. When you control the benchmark, you control the alarm.
  • FDA data contradicts them: The FDA released its Total Diet Study Interface on January 27 — one day after Florida’s press conference — providing public access to decades of food testing data. The FDA’s arsenic findings for confectionery are “significantly lower” than what Florida reported. Either the FDA’s multi-decade, peer-reviewed surveillance program is wrong, or a two-page PDF from Tallahassee is wrong. Florida hasn’t addressed the discrepancy.
  • Propaganda-based consumption limits: Four pieces of Laffy Taffy per year. 2.4 Kit Kat pieces per year. These numbers don’t track with any toxicological framework in use anywhere. They weren’t meant to.

Who Eats This Shit Up

Casey DeSantis.

She presented the findings. Her husband is building a 2026 gubernatorial campaign under her name because he termed out. He’s been positioning her as his “successor” for over a year, telling audiences that she would “do better than me”, using his political committee to clear the field.

This is simply campaign infrastructure branded “Healthy Florida First”, a $5 million state-funded program to spoil elections. This is the disinformation campaign to fabricate a platform for Casey DeSantis, generate statewide media coverage with cooked-up photos of her literally taking candy away from babies.

The URL is ExposingFoodToxins.com, not floridahealth.gov. This is radical-right political branding.

DeSantis admitted it herself: the initiative is setup like how KKK “poison whisper” networks worked under “America First” of the early 1900s. She said she’s fueling “the federal MAHA movement by working as force multipliers” and announced plans to lead “a coalition of states” in political campaigns masked as food testing. She’s building an extremist national politician profile, adjacent to a “health” program.

Florida is falling in line with RFK Jr.’s directive to the FDA to do fake “investigations” and put on a show about it. Florida’s “independent” testing is coordinated with federal political operations on a timeline that coincides with the DeSantis’ gubernatorial campaign launch.

COVID Crank Ladapo

The scientific credibility of the candy report, let alone the whole Florida political campaign, falls on Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo.

You may remember Ladapo recommended men aged 18-39 avoid mRNA COVID vaccines in 2022. Yeah. That guy. He ran an internal Florida DOH analysis and told people not to get a vaccine for COVID.

Why?

Public records requests revealed that he personally had tampered with the findings by deleting conclusions that showed no significant risk. He added language suggesting the vaccines were dangerous. The file was literally labeled “Dr. L’s Edits.” Five successive drafts show the systematic removal of every sensitivity analysis that failed to find a statistically significant relationship between vaccines and cardiac mortality.

Imagine having a cartoonish villain for Surgeon General. Then imagine that villain announcing a candidate for governor who will save the children from dangerous… candy.

A University of Florida College of Medicine committee called Ladapo’s work “seriously flawed.” Researchers from Johns Hopkins and UF concluded the alterations were politically motivated. Yeah, you think?

An internal complaint accused Ladapo of scientific fraud. The FDA and CDC jointly rebuked him for “incorrect, misleading and harmful” use of the VAERS database. His former supervisor at UCLA told Florida not to hire him, saying he relies on opinions over evidence. The Orlando Sentinel editorial board called him a “COVID crank” affiliated with America’s Frontline Doctors, an organization whose members include a physician who attributes illness to sex with demons in dreams.

And yet here we are talking about him again. He attended the DeSantis political press conference to thank them for having “the vision” to test candy for risks, and promised “there’s plenty of dirt, unfortunately, to uncover.”

A scientist describes findings. A political operative, a DeSantis crank, promises dirt on candy.

And Then Nothing Happened

ZOMG. Arsenic. Arsenic. Arsenic. Babies eating poison.

And then?

No recalls issued. No enforcement actions. No emergency orders, injunctions, mandatory testing requirements, or referrals to the FDA.

The FDA Total Diet Study found arsenic was not detected in the majority (57%) of food samples, and when it was found in confectionery, it was at levels far below what Florida reported. When Florida suddenly claims Jolly Ranchers clock in at 540 ppb, that goes up against decades of peer review that say… nope.

If these “health” geniuses really just discovered a box of Nerds delivers 20 times the safe annual arsenic dose to a child, everyone would pull the fire alarm already. We wouldn’t be sucking on a poison dinner mint while scanning a colorful PDF for a “meet my wife” stump speech at The Villages.

The alarm is the product. It’s to generate demand for fire trucks and emergency support where there’s no fire.

Casey DeSantis announced the initiative is expanding to “other products marketed for children” already, because “save the children” is a right-wing radical disinformation gold mine. She is setting up a production schedule.

The Real Harm is DeSantis

Food safety in the United States is genuinely shit. The FDA’s framework for heavy metals in food is slow, underfunded, and subject to industry capture. Arsenic in food is a concern, particularly for children, particularly in rice-based products where the science is well established.

This is what military intelligence troops know as a grain of truth that can be weaponized to radicalize voters and dismantle democracy.

Florida’s stunt makes the actual health problems harder to fix, while making elections easier to fix.

When a state health department publishes methodologically indefensible claims using fabricated benchmarks, it hands the industry legitimate ammunition to dismiss every future concern as a “scare tactic.” The National Confectioners Association is already using Florida’s report to characterize all heavy metals concerns as political theater.

Florida didn’t expose food toxins. Florida gave the food industry a shield to dismiss concerns, which in reality means the food industry is incentivized behind closed doors to fund the campaign. Once in office the fake reports can flip to “all safe” because they were lies to begin with.

Meanwhile, the FDA’s Closer to Zero initiative has been actually doing the slow, unglamorous, peer-reviewed work of establishing defensible action levels for arsenic in children’s food. Real science will be drowned out by the lies spread at a press conference in a retirement community.

The candy industry doesn’t need defending. I hate candy.

Science is real and needs defending. The idea that state health departments should produce honest research rather than such bullshit campaign materials is apparently now a necessary position to re-establish.