Category Archives: Security

marcant Exposes AfD Nazism by Offering Them a Microphone

Here is another banger investigation by marcant of the German Nazi (AfD) Party, which is basically just letting them expose themselves as the hate platform.

For those who don’t speak German:

Holocaust Denial and Antisemitism

20:02

That the Nazis murdered very many Jews, I wouldn’t say that.

20:26 to 20:35, marcant tells them “over six million”

No, that’s not true. It was two million.

20:41, marcant asks for his source

The news. But not the lying press.

Lying press is a Nazi slogan.

21:04

Two million, maximum.

21:20

We’re living in today’s time now, not in the Jew-time.

Jew-time for the AfD was when?

21:24

What was done to people during Corona, that’s history, from then until now.

41:55 to 42:07, asked “Did the Holocaust happen?”

Are you trying to fuck with me? Dude, what’s wrong with you? Are you a Jew or what?

Are you a Jew, as a reaction? Welcome to the AfD.

Nazi Era and Colonial Apologia

2:43 to 2:54, asked what Germany did in Africa under the Kaiser

Germany didn’t commit any invasion.

3:02 to 3:12

I stand by that history. From 1871 until today.

3:21 to 3:37, asked about 1933 to 1945, then why it should be rejected

Not good. I don’t reject it. It’s history. It’s German history. I don’t entirely reject [1933 to 1945]. I wouldn’t call it a negative history.

There it is. The AfD saying out loud that time under Hitler wasn’t negative.

3:45 to 4:20, asked what was positive about it, then who changed Hitler. He never says the name.

The transformation of that one by the SPD. Probably the mayor of Vienna, who had great influence on him. Dr. Karl Lueger. I can only recommend it. Clears a lot up.

29:48 to 30:02

Who dropped the bombs on Dresden? Not the Germans. You need to engage with history and go into detail.

More like who caused Dresden to be bombed. The answer is Hitler.

Slurs

4:20 to 4:29, on the Greens

That filthy scum.

33:14 to 33:22

The Left are criminals. They’ve proven it. Wall shooters and all. And you’ve got such “Kanake” in there with you.

German sailors and colonial administrators in the Pacific adopted “Kanake” (Polynesian word for human) in the 19th century to mean (tan skinned) laborers from islands, which by the 1970s became a racist insult to mean “non-white” laborers being imported to rebuild Germany (Turkish, Arab, Middle Eastern, or southern European).

Violence Against Children

12:14 to 12:27, on AfD MEP Arno Bausemer, alleged to have hit a 14-year-old in the head with a baseball bat in Stendal, now under LKA investigation. Asked if that was disproportionate.

The children need to know what they’re allowed and not allowed to do. I don’t see it that way. You know what my grandma always said? When children don’t know what to do, they’re like a plant. They have to be tied up so they grow straight.

Children have to be tied up to prevent them learning. Welcome to the AfD.

Fascism Inversion

8:23

When CDU, SPD, Left and Greens join together, that’s fascism.

Joining together to collaborate is the literal opposite of a uni-party fascist system.

9:44 to 9:52, asked why Ukraine is fascist

Our government supports Hitler-fascists in Ukraine who tattoo swastikas on themselves.

Have they not noticed Twitter is now branded as a swastika?

10:17

Left-fascist, rainbow-fascist, and worst of all the finance-fascists. That’s the CDU.

Finance fascists? The AfD targets the CDU tactically, to out-extreme the extremists.

45:33 to 45:42, on Merz

BlackRock-infested, the whole lobby behind him.

Russia

39:38 to 39:43, asked who attacked whom

Putin had his justification.

37:49, evidence that Ukraine is safe now for deportations

I know a Ukrainian woman in Kyiv who parties every weekend.

39:18 to 39:28, on Zelensky requesting aid

I’d rather die than be a beggar like him for money.

Deportation

Speaker is 13 years old, blurred in the video.

25:47 to 25:55

You shouldn’t bring all the foreigners into the country, or war refugees. Because most foreigners just cause trouble here.

48:16 to 48:37

The ones who just come here, only cause trouble, rape women, should be deported, or not let in in the first place.

48:53 to 49:20, asked whether his Ukrainian classmate should be deported even if that means being killed by a missile

Yeah, really. Sure, it’s not nice for him to be killed, but he offers our country nothing.

Threats, Harassment, Smears

5:20 to 5:28, after marcant says he was bullied for years at school

I bet they tied a sausage around your neck at school so anyone would play with you.

14:34 to 15:17

Get lost. When I see you, you have to get aggressive. You’re an idiot. You’re nuts. Get lost. With us you’ve got no chance.

50:58 to 51:02, rival streamer on camera, after marcant spoke with the 13-year-old

I just want to document that marcant has a weakness for interviewing little children.

54:27 to 54:33

Come here, say it to my face. If you dare.

“AI Own” and the Techbro Dream of Plantation Life

The plantation was the original demonstration that total ownership and total incapacity coexist. If you think that history clue sounds a lot like today’s techbro fascination with AI, then this post is for you.

A new post called “Everything I own, owned” is worth a critical assessment of what drives the author and how it reflects the state of risk management in society.

Source: schlarpc “Everything I own, owned”, August 23, 2026

First, reflect on how the slave plantation owner held absolute legal dominion over land, buildings, people. He could not plant, could not harvest, could not repair, could not cook his own food. Every practical competence lived in the people he kidnapped, raped and held hostage. Travelers’ accounts of the antebellum South repeatedly note decaying great houses, exhausted soil, deferred maintenance everywhere. Dominion without stewardship produces negligence and decay as its normal condition.

Source: Internet image search for disgusting relics of slavery excesses and owner negligence. “Nutt’s Folly” was being built by workers and craftsmen who left to join the Union army, defend the country against the Slaveholder Rebellion

Second, reflect on the fear of the Plantation owner. The master feared his own property. Slave revolts, poisoning, arson. The entire apparatus of patrols and pass laws existed because ownership of what you cannot understand and did not build is a permanent state of anxiety. The plantation owner claims mastery, while having nothing to back it up.

When you read the “I own” post, you find a voice of someone who declares himself dominant over the monitor, refusing and denying its “popup” for self-care, yet afraid to touch it himself. He claims he is doing the reverse engineering work, while it really is a prompt for AI and he is entirely dependent on the machine that did it. The fear is structural, produced by the gap between what he insists he commands and what he actually comprehends.

“Are we the baddies?” Source: Mitchell and Webb sketch in which Nazi officers realize they are not the good guys.

Third, reflect upon the Plantation accounting system. It recorded the estate as the owner’s achievement. Bales produced, acres cleared, all credited to the man who directed. The “I own” post says the GitHub repos fill with “generated-slop docs” credited under his name, where the churn hours are tallied like labor extracted, the usual byline on a false mastery narrative. The system that erases the laborer from the output is what seems to be left intact 160 years after the Slaveholder Rebellion was lost. When you know history of 1800s American “management” practices, here we see only the laborer has changed.

The post’s actual argument, stripped of the framing, is simply this: I told a machine what I wanted, it produced artifacts I mostly validated against real hardware, and now I’m worried other people will do the same thing maliciously.

Ok, so that’s a legitimate observation trying to elevate himself as dangerous by discovery, a form of self-loathing popularized in superhero comics. Who should have the power of Beowulf, strength of 30 men in one hand? However, this is different because the “Everything I own, owned” title transforms directed labor into personal mastery, which is precisely the ideological move that invokes plantation logic and makes it invisible to the person performing it.

The plantation owner doesn’t understand cotton or corn mash at the level the labor does. He understands command. He mistakes the power to direct for the competence to produce. Then he takes ownership of the output and writes about what he accomplished. Therefore the post title belongs to the agent. He specified goals. Claude did the reasoning, the tool use, the cross-validation, the documentation, the patch generation. This guy says he typed “keep going” and such 98 times and then called it his agent-driven research.

Here’s more detail on a specific example. He rejects his monitor manufacturer’s authority, from actual engineers who actually understand OLED degradation, and instead practices unexamined authority over Claude, whose outputs he also won’t fully trust. He’s too afraid to flash the patch. So he rejects the expert, says he commands the labor, and then can’t use his “own” product.

Source: Antislavery Almanac, 1840

My ASUS ROG Swift PG42UQ monitor was actually where I started, because I got annoyed at the pop-up overlay that comes up every once in a while that tells me to run “pixel cleaning”. I have never intentionally run pixel cleaning on this monitor and I never will, I don’t care, and I would like for that overlay to go away forever. […] The pixel cleaning warning turns out to have no native way to disable it, and it’ll always show up after 8 hours of runtime. Oh well. Claude did find the appropriate area to patch to kill the functionality though. I haven’t actually been brave enough to write a modified firmware to the thing yet – it’s a pretty expensive monitor – but I’ll get there at some point.

I feel like I’m reading an Plantation owners guide to making bourbon, forcing a black man to figure it out and distill faster, where the ignorant Slaver even says he’s afraid to drink his “own” drink.

Source: Jack Daniel

He believes he has maximized freedom from constraint (no pixel cleaning, no vendor tools, no authority over his hardware) and yet he hasn’t achieved the actual capacity to act effectively. His monitor is now neglected and governed by nobody. Not the manufacturer, not him.

Negative liberty is being mistaken for positive liberty.

There’s a Dunning-Kruger smell to this, where he has enough knowledge to feel confident rejecting expert guidance, and not enough to act on his own alternative. The reverse engineering process gives him procedural knowledge (how the firmware works), which he mistakes for the actual level of institutional knowledge embedded in the pixel cleaning feature. Years of OLED panel engineering and failure-mode data ignored, because of ignorance.

That’s someone craving epistemic autonomy without working to reach epistemic competence. He performs the dance of Enlightenment (reject received authority, reason from first principles) and stops far short, before the discipline that makes his moves legitimate. The Enlightenment actually demanded rigorous self-examination and accountability for conclusions. He substitutes automated, routine technical procedure for the discipline of thinking. Oh, the irony of becoming a useless cog while claiming to own the machine. Running reverse engineering tools is not even close to the same as understanding what the manufacturer knows about long-term OLED degradation, let alone electronics maintenance.

His github repo also shows pinned work with ATF Form 5320.23 generator (NFA firearms transfer paperwork), reverse engineering RH25 thermal weapon optics, and “rof-gui — Quantifies your dakka” (rate-of-fire measurement).

In conclusion, a graduate of North Carolina State University offers danger through a presence that withdraws accountability. He calls himself the “100% snowman” and ends “Everything I own, owned” with a melting face. The snowman melts in cheerful dissolution, like an invisibility privilege: I did something alarming, you should be afraid of it/me, shrug, melt.

Ruffalo Did the Mitzvah. Paramount Did the Antisemitism.

Paramount ran its PR engine into the trade press on Friday to accuse Mark Ruffalo of “antisemitic tropes”.

Why?

Ruffalo had shared a video of Oracle executive Safra Catz describing technology her company supplied to the Israeli military. He quoted her own words about her own employer. Think about that. Her words, her employer, repeated. And somehow the person repeating her words is the bad guy?

Paramount defense of a $110 billion merger, when measured on my highly accurate disinformation sensor gets the following result.

You don’t have to be Jewish to check what either party said against the traditions of Judaism. The Ellisons’ conduct is the obvious immoral failure here. Allow me to explain, as I think you will soon see Ellison doesn’t hold a candle.

Start with the verse that sets the category. Ezekiel 18:20: the person who sins bears the sin. Halakha judges deeds. It refuses inherited guilt and collective guilt alike. That refusal shields every Jew from association with Oracle’s contracts, and it shields Ruffalo from the claim that scrutinizing those contracts touches Jews at all. Paramount’s statement performs the exact awful conflation that it alleges shouldn’t happen. It treats one corporation’s military business as coextensive with Jewish identity, so that criticism of the business becomes prejudice against the people. Nope.

Now look at the conduct.

Larry Ellison stood before an Oracle analyst meeting in September 2024 and described the product:

Citizens will be on their best behavior because we’re constantly recording and reporting everything that’s going on.

The Talmud names this.

First, Hezek re’iyah, damage by seeing, treats surveillance as a tort in itself. Bava Batra prohibits even a window overlooking a neighbor’s courtyard before anyone acts on what is seen. Rabbenu Gershom banned reading another’s letters a thousand years before packet inspection. And the tradition holds that conduct produced by watchers carries zero moral weight.

Yochanan ben Zakkai’s deathbed blessing in Berachot 28b was that his students fear Heaven as much as they fear flesh and blood, because people transgress when they believe no human sees them. Ellison proposes to perfect the fear of flesh and blood. His system abolishes the moral act while claiming to manufacture it. That’s a big nope, again.

Catz supplied the second count.

Avodah Zarah 15b forbids selling weapons or instruments of harm where misuse is foreseeable, and Rambam extends the rule to anything that endangers. The prohibition presumes the seller investigates the end use.

Catz told an Israeli-American Council summit that Oracle built “really profoundly scary technology” for the military effort, including things she said she could not discuss. Secrecy about end use inverts the halakhic duty. Boasting that the use is unspeakable concedes the violation.

Nope, nope, and nope.

Third count: shochad. Exodus 23:8 warns that a bribe blinds the clear-sighted. Ellison gave Friends of the IDF the largest single gift in its history. In 2021, while a witness in Netanyahu’s corruption trial, Haaretz reported he offered the defendant a seat on Oracle’s board. A paid position, extended to an indicted head of government, by a witness in his own case. The bribery texts legislate this exact scenario, and the rabbis extended them to shochad devarim, influence through favors, because influence launders itself.

I’m gonna need a bigger nope machine.

Fourth: Isaiah 5:8. Woe to those who join house to house and field to field until room runs out. The prophet was describing market cornering. This merger would fuse two of the largest studios while twelve state attorneys general sue to block it, atop an Oracle stake in TikTok and family direction of CBS News. Information is the field being joined.

Which leaves the accusation itself. Ready? Do I even need to explain?

Motzi shem ra, spreading a false damaging name, ranks in the tradition as graver than true gossip. Paramount named its trope in the statement zero times, quoted zero sentences, identified zero mechanisms.

That’s a huge tell. Ellison runs a database that labels things without any of the data to back it up. Get it? An empty database, spreading accusations, for a fee.

An accusation that specifies nothing can be refuted by nothing, and its real audience is every other actor weighing public opposition to the merger. Deploying the memory of Jewish persecution as armor for a corporate transaction is chillul Hashem, and it leaves every genuine report of antisemitism weaker than it found it.

Ellison is undermining Jews on so many levels you have to wonder why?

Leviticus 19:17 commands rebuke. Hocheach tochiach et amitecha: you shall surely rebuke your fellow.

Ruffalo performed the mitzvah.

Paramount has attacked the Jews, repeatedly, and deployed big PR machines to label themselves as the hero.