Category Archives: Food

Florida Weaponized Candy for DeSantis’ Wife to Become Governor

Florida dropped a disinformation bomb from their “Healthy Florida First” platform, which says eating six Jolly Ranchers in a year could poison your child.

It’s total bullshit.

Look, I’m not going to defend candy. Anyone who knows me knows I can’t stand the stuff. I haven’t touched a piece in decades and I think the industry is nuts.

But reading this Florida report that a single box of Nerds exceeds the “safe annual arsenic exposure” for a kid by roughly 20 times, throws more red flags than a Chinese military parade.

This is radical political campaign literature thinly dressed in an evil lab coat. Two and a half Snickers bars per year is the line between safety and cancer?

GTFO. Anyone reprinting or spreading this stuff needs to know what’s actually going on here.

As a disinformation historian, allow me to explain this has nothing to do with candy and everything to do with political extremists undermining elections.

The Pitch

On January 26, the Florida Department of Health released a two-page PDF through ExposingFoodToxins.com that claims 28 of 46 candy products contained arsenic “at elevated levels.”

Governor Ron DeSantis with his First Lady Casey DeSantis, flanked by the discredited Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo, held a press conference at The Villages. Why there? It’s Florida’s largest retirement community and one of its most politically steeped Republican strongholds. They announced fraud to an audience that would never challenge the obviousness of it.

The document was curated for maximum viral impact by placing product photos alongside scary red numbers, consumption limits so low they’re absurd, and the word “arsenic” on repeat. Arsenic. Arsenic. Arsenic.

It does not include any methodology, there’s no peer review, it has no source data, no laboratory identification, no confidence intervals, or sample sizes per product.

Come on people.

None of the basic scientific documentation that would allow independent verification is in the release because none of it is real. Florida’s Department of Health was asked for clarification by multiple sources and so far there has been no update.

The Fraud

They tested for the wrong thing.

This lab used EPA Method 6010D, which measures total arsenic. That means they looked at organic and inorganic combined, despite organic arsenic being relatively harmless and found widely in food.

Inorganic arsenic is the dangerous kind. Without speciation testing, all the numbers are scientifically meaningless for assessing health risk.

Florida of course knows this. Every toxicologist of course knows this. Here’s what was pumped into a retirement community to juice political activism:

  • Fabricated benchmarks: The “safe” annual consumption limits don’t correspond to any federal regulatory standard or peer-reviewed threshold for candy. The FDA has no arsenic action level for confectionery. Florida invented its own, didn’t explain the derivation, and didn’t subject it to review. When you control the benchmark, you control the alarm.
  • FDA data contradicts them: The FDA released its Total Diet Study Interface on January 27 — one day after Florida’s press conference — providing public access to decades of food testing data. The FDA’s arsenic findings for confectionery are “significantly lower” than what Florida reported. Either the FDA’s multi-decade, peer-reviewed surveillance program is wrong, or a two-page PDF from Tallahassee is wrong. Florida hasn’t addressed the discrepancy.
  • Propaganda-based consumption limits: Four pieces of Laffy Taffy per year. 2.4 Kit Kat pieces per year. These numbers don’t track with any toxicological framework in use anywhere. They weren’t meant to.

Who Eats This Shit Up

Casey DeSantis.

She presented the findings. Her husband is building a 2026 gubernatorial campaign under her name because he termed out. He’s been positioning her as his “successor” for over a year, telling audiences that she would “do better than me”, using his political committee to clear the field.

This is simply campaign infrastructure branded “Healthy Florida First”, a $5 million state-funded program to spoil elections. This is the disinformation campaign to fabricate a platform for Casey DeSantis, generate statewide media coverage with cooked-up photos of her literally taking candy away from babies.

The URL is ExposingFoodToxins.com, not floridahealth.gov. This is radical-right political branding.

DeSantis admitted it herself: the initiative is setup like how KKK “poison whisper” networks worked under “America First” of the early 1900s. She said she’s fueling “the federal MAHA movement by working as force multipliers” and announced plans to lead “a coalition of states” in political campaigns masked as food testing. She’s building an extremist national politician profile, adjacent to a “health” program.

Florida is falling in line with RFK Jr.’s directive to the FDA to do fake “investigations” and put on a show about it. Florida’s “independent” testing is coordinated with federal political operations on a timeline that coincides with the DeSantis’ gubernatorial campaign launch.

COVID Crank Ladapo

The scientific credibility of the candy report, let alone the whole Florida political campaign, falls on Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo.

You may remember Ladapo recommended men aged 18-39 avoid mRNA COVID vaccines in 2022. Yeah. That guy. He ran an internal Florida DOH analysis and told people not to get a vaccine for COVID.

Why?

Public records requests revealed that he personally had tampered with the findings by deleting conclusions that showed no significant risk. He added language suggesting the vaccines were dangerous. The file was literally labeled “Dr. L’s Edits.” Five successive drafts show the systematic removal of every sensitivity analysis that failed to find a statistically significant relationship between vaccines and cardiac mortality.

Imagine having a cartoonish villain for Surgeon General. Then imagine that villain announcing a candidate for governor who will save the children from dangerous… candy.

A University of Florida College of Medicine committee called Ladapo’s work “seriously flawed.” Researchers from Johns Hopkins and UF concluded the alterations were politically motivated. Yeah, you think?

An internal complaint accused Ladapo of scientific fraud. The FDA and CDC jointly rebuked him for “incorrect, misleading and harmful” use of the VAERS database. His former supervisor at UCLA told Florida not to hire him, saying he relies on opinions over evidence. The Orlando Sentinel editorial board called him a “COVID crank” affiliated with America’s Frontline Doctors, an organization whose members include a physician who attributes illness to sex with demons in dreams.

And yet here we are talking about him again. He attended the DeSantis political press conference to thank them for having “the vision” to test candy for risks, and promised “there’s plenty of dirt, unfortunately, to uncover.”

A scientist describes findings. A political operative, a DeSantis crank, promises dirt on candy.

And Then Nothing Happened

ZOMG. Arsenic. Arsenic. Arsenic. Babies eating poison.

And then?

No recalls issued. No enforcement actions. No emergency orders, injunctions, mandatory testing requirements, or referrals to the FDA.

The FDA Total Diet Study found arsenic was not detected in the majority (57%) of food samples, and when it was found in confectionery, it was at levels far below what Florida reported. When Florida suddenly claims Jolly Ranchers clock in at 540 ppb, that goes up against decades of peer review that say… nope.

If these “health” geniuses really just discovered a box of Nerds delivers 20 times the safe annual arsenic dose to a child, everyone would pull the fire alarm already. We wouldn’t be sucking on a poison dinner mint while scanning a colorful PDF for a “meet my wife” stump speech at The Villages.

The alarm is the product. It’s to generate demand for fire trucks and emergency support where there’s no fire.

Casey DeSantis announced the initiative is expanding to “other products marketed for children” already, because “save the children” is a right-wing radical disinformation gold mine. She is setting up a production schedule.

The Real Harm is DeSantis

Food safety in the United States is genuinely shit. The FDA’s framework for heavy metals in food is slow, underfunded, and subject to industry capture. Arsenic in food is a concern, particularly for children, particularly in rice-based products where the science is well established.

This is what military intelligence troops know as a grain of truth that can be weaponized to radicalize voters and dismantle democracy.

Florida’s stunt makes the actual health problems harder to fix, while making elections easier to fix.

When a state health department publishes methodologically indefensible claims using fabricated benchmarks, it hands the industry legitimate ammunition to dismiss every future concern as a “scare tactic.” The National Confectioners Association is already using Florida’s report to characterize all heavy metals concerns as political theater.

Florida didn’t expose food toxins. Florida gave the food industry a shield to dismiss concerns, which in reality means the food industry is incentivized behind closed doors to fund the campaign. Once in office the fake reports can flip to “all safe” because they were lies to begin with.

Meanwhile, the FDA’s Closer to Zero initiative has been actually doing the slow, unglamorous, peer-reviewed work of establishing defensible action levels for arsenic in children’s food. Real science will be drowned out by the lies spread at a press conference in a retirement community.

The candy industry doesn’t need defending. I hate candy.

Science is real and needs defending. The idea that state health departments should produce honest research rather than such bullshit campaign materials is apparently now a necessary position to re-establish.

Research: Ultra Processed Food (UPF) Addictive Like Cigarettes

Put your Pringles can down for a minute and read this:

A study by researchers at three United States universities claims to have identified similarities between the addictive characteristics of ultra-processed foods (UPFs) and cigarettes, and has recommended similar levels of regulation.

According to the study, which was published this week in the Milbank Quarterly healthcare journal, UPFs “share key engineering strategies adopted from the tobacco industry” which are designed to drive “compulsive consumption.”

Designed?

UPFs are not just nutrients but [are] intentionally designed, highly engineered and manipulated, hedonically optimized products.

Hedonically? This sounds like something that would be used to target oppressed communities with a dangerous illusion.

Responding to the Milbank Quarterly study, Dr. Githinji Gitahi, the chief executive of Kenya-based NGO Amref Health Africa, warned of a “growing public health alarm” across Africa.

“Corporate [organizations] have found a comfortable, and profitable, nexus: weak government regulation on harmful products and a changing pattern of consumption,” he told The Guardian. “This places new and preventable pressures on already stretched health systems.”

Tesla Diner is the Starlink Canary: You Want Loyalty Fries With That Erratic Autocratic Infrastructure?

Less than six months after opening, Elon Musk’s Tesla Diner in Hollywood has the feel of a Rhodesian ghost town.

The celebrity chef is gone. Eric Greenspan, a Le Cordon Bleu graduate who helped build Mr Beast Burger, quietly departed and scrubbed his Instagram of any association with the venture. The hundred-person lines evaporated. The global expansion plan went the same way as Musk’s other promises, nowhere. On a recent Friday afternoon, more staff lifted fingerprints off chrome walls than there were customers.

The Guardian reports that the novelty of eating at a restaurant owned by the world’s most hated man “seems to have worn off.” A more precise diagnosis: the reputational cost of association with investments in Musk now exceeds any benefit, and the competent professionals have done the math.

Greenspan’s Instagram scrubbing is the digital equivalent of removing a company from your résumé before it gets raided. He hasn’t publicly explained his departure. He doesn’t need to. The AfD promotion in Germany and Nazi salutes at Trump’s inauguration—”repeatedly portrayed in the picket signs held by Tesla Diner protesters,” per the Guardian—made the calculation straightforward.

This is what the Musk ecosystem is all about: not dramatic collapse, but a leaky hype balloon with gradual evacuation by anyone with options, leaving behind only the true believers. The diner can absorb not being a diner. A shiny chrome dumpster fire in Hollywood is embarrassing but survivable.

Starlink is the other side of this coin.

The same week the Guardian documented the diner’s decline, Forbes published what reads like Starlink investor relations copy. Joel Shulman, who discloses financial affiliations with investment vehicles that benefit from exactly this narrative, celebrates Musk as playing “a different entrepreneurial game.”

Different is an interesting word choice. The piece inadvertently catalogs every Musk vulnerability while fraudulently framing them as strengths:

His companies iterate faster than regulators, incumbents, and even capital markets are structured to absorb.

The simple stupidity of raw speed is presented as true genius. It’s actually the explicit strategy of toddler-like skills, operating outside democratic accountability. The speed isn’t about innovation—it’s about fait accompli. Get the absolute worst possible version of infrastructure embedded before anyone can object.

A vertically integrated, globally scalable communications network that bypasses nearly every legacy constraint of the telecom industry.

Those “constraints” include safety and reliability, regulatory oversight, spectrum licensing, and the political processes that prevent private actors from controlling critical infrastructure without accountability. Bypassing them isn’t really a feature, especially after governments decide it isn’t.

Infrastructure that governments, industries, and populations increasingly depend on.

The Ukraine episode already demonstrated what happens when Musk controls infrastructure that anyone depends on. He toggled access based on a personal whim. The piece treats dependency as a moat. It’s actually an invitation to regulatory intervention, if not forfeiture.

Switching costs are high where Starlink is the only viable option.

The monopoly framing. This is the argument for why regulators will eventually act, not why they won’t. Shulman bizarrely invokes railroads and electricity as precedents for infrastructure monopolies that compound private wealth indefinitely. He appears not to have read the second half of that history.

Railroads: The Interstate Commerce Act of 1887. Federal rate regulation. Antitrust action. Eventually nationalization of passenger rail. The robber baron era ended precisely because railroad dependency triggered democratic backlash.

Electricity: Heavily regulated as a public utility. Rate-setting by state commissions. Must-serve obligations. Prohibition on discriminatory pricing.

The monopoly dream Shulman celebrates was tamed by regulation in every historical instance he cites. Rockefeller’s Standard Oil was broken up. AT&T was broken up. The Gilded Age produced the Progressive Era.

“Infrastructure makes it permanent,” Shulman writes, as if history ends at the moment of monopoly formation.

It doesn’t.

The political economy of essential infrastructure has a second act: public assertion of control over private power to prevent catastrophe. He’s describing the conditions under which democratic societies historically decide that private control of critical infrastructure is obviously unacceptable.

Apparently he wants to rewrite history, or just doesn’t realize he’s making the argument against himself.

The Tesla diner shows the trajectory. The Forbes piece shows the radical investor class hasn’t noticed.

When the competent people flee and only the loyalists remain—people selected for devotion rather than capability—you get soggy industrial fries served in a soulless, empty and shiny corporate diner.

That’s the optimistic scenario.

The pessimistic scenario is the same dynamic applied to global communications infrastructure that governments and militaries depend on. An erratic autocrat who has already demonstrated he’ll use infrastructure access as political leverage. A workforce increasingly selected for loyalty over competence. No democratic accountability structure. Explicitly designed to outrun regulation.

Starlink is exposed as an erratic, autocratic, global communications infrastructure, maintained by a loyalty cult.

The diner is the proof of concept—showing exactly what happens when the reputational toxicity reaches escape velocity and the professionals calculate their exit.

The only question is timeline.

Wegmans is Watching: NYC Grocer Goes Full Surveillance on Bananas

A New York family-owned grocery chain investing in eyes/voice/face biometric collection infrastructure just for shoplifting prevention doesn’t quite add up economically.

It reminds me how IBM pushed license plate reader technology onto NYC bridges in 1966.

Hearings, Reports and Prints of the Senate Committee on Appropriations, Volume 89, U.S. Government Printing Office, 1966, p 33

Wegmans launched facial recognition in October 2024 at its Brooklyn Navy Yard location, initially claiming it would delete data from non-consenting shoppers. It’s a notable claim given a $400,000 settlement with New York’s Attorney General over a data breach exposing 3 million consumers.

It’s also notable given the FTC’s 2023 Rite Aid enforcement action, revealing the chain used facial recognition in “hundreds of stores” from 2012-2020, generating “thousands of false-positive matches” that disproportionately flagged women and people of color. Rite Aid received a five-year facial recognition ban and was required to delete both images and algorithms developed from collected data.

By 2025, the Wegmans program expanded to all NYC stores with a critical policy change: signage now indicates collection of eyes/voice/face data from all shoppers, and the promise to delete non-participant data was removed.

Wegmans’ privacy policy still claims biometric collection is “limited to facial recognition information”, contradicting the new in-store signs that say eyes/voice/face; a large discrepancy the company has not explained.

The opacity of Wegmans’ specific arrangements—refusing to disclose its vendor, data retention policies, or law enforcement sharing practices—suggests awareness that basic levels of transparency might reveal uncomfortable interdependencies of a growing data extraction and centralization economy that shifts costs to taxpayers (through grants and policing partnerships), shares risks across industry consortiums, and potentially opens future monetization pathways.

Wegmans’ own privacy policy states:

We may provide Security Information to law enforcement for investigations, to prevent fraud, or for safety and security purposes.

Think twice about the real price. At Wegmans, it’s bananas how they capture and sell you.