Category Archives: Energy

Subaru Announces Diesel Engine

Amazing. I was excited to hear about the Audi TDI coming to the US, but now I see Subaru is planning a European diesel. I love the boxer engine in the Subaru, as well as their all wheel drive. I suspect this new diesel will have incredible efficiency:

Subaru will use next month’s Geneva motor show to debut its new diesel boxer engine in the Legacy and Outback models. The engine marks the first diesel application for a horizontally opposed engine.

The engine’s rigidity enabled Subaru to shorten it by more than two inches compared with the gasoline version. The diesel 2.0-liter turbocharged H4 produces 147 hp and 258 lb-ft of torque.

Ok, the really amazing thing here is that Subaru’s top-of-the-line Impreza gasoline engine in 2008 produces a Japanese record-setting 304 hp at 6,400 rpm and 311 pound-feet of torque at 4,400 rpm. So their new basic diesel model for daily drivers will produce nearly the same torque as the hottest rally-car on the market (surely at lower rpm), while probably delivering twice the mpg.

Hello, Subaru. Import please.

Cooling With Heat

The DW has a nice article about German scientists who are finding ways to use heat to cool things:

The principle of solar cooling, the so-called ammoniac-water absorption technique, has been known since 1810.

In Gladbeck, this idea has been extrapolated to the idea of using warmth from other processes such as the heat of baking ovens.

I vaguely remember a doctor once telling me that air-conditioning is the greatest invention of all time because it allows for so many health-related benefits. I suppose non-energy based cooling would be an even better invention, although it appears a couple hundred years have already passed since first discovery.

Audi Again Shows the Future is Diesel

Exciting news. The Audi A4 3.0 TDI is supposed to be released in the US later this year. Consider this review from 2007:

Executive diesel models have probably progressed further than any other type of car within the last few years. Whereas once being issued with a diesel from your company meant a valid claim for constructive dismissal, things are very different now. Its difficult to understate the importance of the BMW 330d in making paying serious money for a diesel seem an entirely rational course of action and the Audi A4 3.0 TDI Quattro follows in its wheeltracks, offering a range of Quattro four-wheel drive saloon and Avant estate models at prices starting at £27,800.

Nowadays, anybody turning their nose up at this particular oil-burner probably thinks that Skodas are naff and that Rolls Royces are the finest cars in the world. In other words the automotive world may just have passed them by. The A4 3.0 TDI offers all the characteristics that make todays premium diesels such an impressive package.

The automotive world is changing and diesel is the technology to watch. It provides the closest thing to highly resilient and distributed fuel sources. All wheel drive, 40mpg, 0-60 in 6 seconds…awesome.

TDI considered here can produce enough torque to pull a house down, more indeed than a Ferrari 360 Modena.

The diesels produce torque in a way that turns the power model upside down. My VW is a better tow vehicle than most trucks and SUVs, and a better highway performer than most sports cars.

The ZER Customs site provides some interesting detail from an Audi press release:

According to calculations by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the United States could save 1.4 million barrels of crude oil every day if just one third of all passenger cars and light-duty commercial vehicles were equipped with up-to-date diesel engines.

That is a lot of Audis…

Chernobyl Lessons

Interesting review by the BBC of the Chernobyl nuclear disaster.

Reactions went awry, apparently, when some engineers tried to test a hypothesis on a production system. The system quickly heated out of control during the test, and was unable to recover.

Operational errors:

The reactor began to overheat and its water coolant started to turn to steam.

At this point it is thought that all but six control rods had been removed from the reactor core – the minimum safe operating number was considered to be 30.

Design errors:

Because the reactor was not housed in a reinforced concrete shell, as is standard practice in most countries, the building sustained severe damage and large amounts of radioactive debris escaped into the atmosphere.

They are still working on building a containment system, twenty years later, and now need £600m to replace the present system that is failing. Wonder what the cost of the containment shell, and/or a proper development and test environment, would have been prior to the accident.