Category Archives: Food

Mark Rober Poked the TSLA Fraud Bear: Now Watch Safety Failure Get Redefined by Angry Mob

When a former NASA engineer demonstrated conclusively and cautiously a Tesla unable to detect a wall and running over child mannequins, a social media army has jumped into action to angrily defend the man-slaughtering design.

March 2025 the Tesla driverless experience is still blind to objects and humans in the road. Arguably it has only gotten worse as the company intentionally removed critical safety equipment, slashing costs despite known risks to life and property. Source: Screen grab from Mark Rober video

Tesla’s response of course to findings like this has never been to address safety concerns with engineering, but instead a barrage of debate tactics and threats. Thus, it’s time again to watch the masterclass in military intelligence methods unleashing their usual terminological obfuscation/smoke game.

The media machine [using Soviet scaffolding repurposed by KGB officers to run their Russian dictatorship] seeks to not only provide an alternative narrative with a Russian version of events, but also to cause general confusion and question the whole notion of the truth. It provides varying accounts of events, often based in truth, that work to sow discord and confusion.

This is not a theoretical experience for American engineers working on safety reports, this has been a long-time a fundamental public safety issue by design.

Everyone knows the Kremlin seeks to use information to deny, deceive, and confuse… You could spend every hour of every day trying to bat down every lie, to the point where you don’t achieve anything else. And that’s exactly what the Kremlin wants

An engineer’s hands are tied up with truckloads of misdirection and misinformation so they can’t possibly do engineering? A truth-teller delivering transparent results is accused of manipulation by the biggest manipulators, up is down, math and physics no longer can be real… in the fog of information warfare. We know how and why many people will die, until we’re facing a tidal wave of “nothing is real” attacks.

March 2025 a Tesla autopilot still runs over children like it’s 2016, with sensors unable to handle normal road conditions as if negligent by design. Over 50 people have so far been killed by Tesla autopilot flaws.

Notably the angry mob spins their attacks as a “defense” strategy to protect their assets, their way of life, as if they are the real victims and not the people who will be killed by design. They’re blasting information weapons out into the Internet with a claim to be protecting something they consider so valuable, so critical to their own survival, any lives lost by others (e.g. killed by Tesla) get reframed as just collateral damage.

A Tesla balloon designed to be made of lead has a “good” reason for never getting off the ground…

Consider the irony. A Tesla vision failure means it can’t “see” a child mannequin and runs it over without any regard for human life. Tesla defenders don’t “see” this as design failure, but rather focus on what they can “see” as an attack by anyone who dares to speak the truth of exactly how and why a child would be killed.

It’s a kind of consistency in trained and limited vision, an inability to process real outcomes, that’s a result of military-like basic training about who deserves to live or die.

“You’ll Believe What We Tell You To” Say Tesla PK Shock Troops

Tribune.com.pk’s recent mob-rule-sounding propaganda blast attacking Mark Rober’s Tesla test is a perfect example of how the military intelligence of an unnamed nation state can unleash weaponized words to deflect meaningful criticism to float the stock value underpinning one of their key foreign assets.

The techniques we’re seeing mirror Soviet “Operation Infektion” that falsely claimed AIDS was a US bioweapon – a playbook preserved and upgraded by those who deployed it originally. Despite having an economy smaller than Italy’s, this nation maintains disproportionate global influence operations, as essential to its power as oil revenues. Like inheriting a Cold War nuclear arsenal then repurposing it for neighborhood extortion, former intelligence operatives now running a dictatorship deploy their keyboard armies against threats to their investments. Tesla’s terminology battles represent just one theater in this broader campaign – flooding discourse with confusion to exhaust experts and undermine regulation. The ultimate goal remains unchanged: enable rapid wealth extraction by using asymmetric information attacks to prevent accountability for preventable harms and deaths.

With that in mind, thousands of keyboard warriors from an unknown country are now on a campaign to attack Rober as if he “misrepresented Tesla” because he supposedly tested “Autopilot” not “Full Self-Driving”, as if any of those words have actual meaning and a distinction matters when the fundamental issue is Tesla in 2025 demonstrates the complete failure to detect a wall and mannequins it claimed a decade ago to be a solved problem. More to the point, Tesla claimed it would be the first to solve this safety issue and be the most safe car on the road, placing itself above all other designs and engineers unequivocally and without exception.

Tesla fails 50% of the safety tests, meaning three child mannequins were run over by its flawed camera-only driverless system, compared with a car wisely using LiDAR. Source: Screen grab from Mark Rober video

Here’s the absurd logic at work, just to make clear how cruel and cynical the military intelligence system is at pushing Tesla into certain death of Americans (remember for purposes of information warfare severity, millions of people died during the Cold War from its targeted application):

  • Tesla markets the term “Autopilot” without shame in 2016, announcing autopilot capabilities removing any need for a human by 2017, and their CEO repeatedly states that anyone criticizing autopilot with caution about adoption should be held responsible for deaths — BECAUSE AUTOPILOT IS SOLD AS CAPABLE OF PREVENTING DEATH
  • People start to die because they trust Tesla marketing, with two fatal crashes immediately in 2016 and a pedestrian dead in 2018…
  • Tesla starts to passively criticize Autopilot itself by 2020, announcing “Full Self-Driving” that will do what Autopilot was sold to do.
  • Tesla in late 2024 changes the name of FSD to “supervised”, passively criticizing both Autopilot and FSD as being incapable of achieving their meaning, admitting they’ve never been using language correctly. Musk pumps even harder on the propaganda, claiming there will be ZERO CRASHES IN 2025, despite at least 52 deaths from Autopilot and FSD together so far)
  • Anyone testing these systems is accused of the crime that Tesla is committing, as if misuse of language is applied to anyone pointing out the misuse of language. It’s always “didn’t test the right system” because there is no actual system to test, just a shell game of opaque unaccountable abusive behavior that puts everyone in danger except Tesla.

This terminological methodology, well known to scholars of military intelligence and targeted attacks on populations, is designed for Tesla to never be held accountable. When deaths occur, the response isn’t to investigate and fix the technology, but to revise words and change definitions. When tests demonstrate failures, the reaction isn’t engineering revised and better safety systems, but semantic arguments to avoid engineering at all. Meanwhile, the body count continues to rise while Musk makes increasingly absurd safety claims detached from reality and attacks his critics with baseless claims they are doing what he does. It’s a casino mentality where he sets up mirrors and tables to unjust house rules such that anyone who dares to enter his realm can never win.

Deadly Tesla Disengagement

Learning how magicians lie is such a disappointment because the magic is lost. This is what the Electrek journalist discovered after being attacked by Tesla’s investors who demanded he believe in the magic:

NHTSA’s investigation of Tesla vehicles on Autopilot crashing into emergency vehicles on the highway found that Autopilot would disengage within less than one second prior to impact on average in the crashes that it was investigating…

Rober’s video captured this exact behavior! The magic gone in an instant. Watch carefully as the system disengages 17 frames before impact. This is a damning example of Tesla engineering designing coverups into friendly-fire situations. They built a feature to generate maximum plausible deniability to reduce their liability in a known deadly outcome they are responsible for creating. “The system wasn’t engaged during the crash” becomes the technical truth that masks the killer reality: the Tesla since 2016 promises of solving driverless completely by 2017 still fail to prevent a crash in 2025 that it should detect well in advance.

Seventeen LONG Frames Before Death

Other cars can do it today. Other cars didn’t promise to solve crashes by 2017. Tesla can’t do it today. Tesla promised to have it solved by 2017. You think it matters what words Tesla uses when they’ve proven since even before 2016 that none of their words can be trusted? Accepting their preference in terminology is like agreeing to let a toddler rewrite the dictionary in a way that helps them never be responsible for anything.

Tesla has been selling people a word salad unsafe for consumption. Their “apple” is actually a painted rock. And when someone breaks a tooth trying to bite into it, Tesla argues “this is our LOOKING apple, it can’t yet be bitten.” After many people lose their teeth Tesla announces “we have a banana for you to go with our apple.” Should someone test either the “apple” or the new “banana” they would discover both are painted rocks, to which Tesla says “forget the apple, we replaced the banana with another banana, and another one, and another one, next year the banana will be so edible nobody will break a tooth ever again”… and the next year more teeth are broken, repeating this advance fee fraud forever. It’s really no different than the 419 African email scam.

In this new safety test video by the ex-NASA engineer we see someone showing a Tesla apple for what it is, and always has been, just a painted rock. It’s a LIE that has dragged on since 2016. Because LiDAR don’t LIE. There shouldn’t be controversy in this VERY OLD NEWS. The exact opposite in fact, this video should be welcomed like how someone who just placed 154th in a group event gets congratulated. Hey Mark, welcome, and thanks for participating in something that has been operating for over ten years with the same results. Welcome to Mark, welcome into the big tent with everyone who already understands that since 2016 Tesla has been selling “driverless” for hundreds of millions and more hundreds of millions without ever providing what they had claimed from the start.

Another Brick in the Wall Tesla Can’t See

While Tesla plays word games to undermine safety, the reality remains unchanged: their low-quality consumer-grade camera-only system simply and predictably fails basic tests that LiDAR-equipped vehicles have passed for a decade. This isn’t new to anyone with a clue because engineers have been demonstrating this fundamental flaw repeatedly and dramatically (although, I’ll admit, not as dramatically as this high-production new Disney-like video). The Dawn Project and numerous safety experts have shown these exact same failures in many media formats with the same conclusive results, yet Tesla removed safety in the false name of a fictional “efficiency”.

Elon Musk… has expressed his admiration for Rand’s work, particularly “The Fountainhead.”

In Ayn Rand’s novel “The Fountainhead,” the character Dominique Francon purchases a beautiful Greek statue that she genuinely admires, then deliberately destroys it by throwing it out the window. It’s almost like Elon Musk is that character, who destroys everything he touches to prove that is better (for him) than letting it exist in a world that doesn’t appreciate him enough. Musk’s “the best part is no part” psychosis is destructive thinking that removed critical safety sensors from Tesla vehicles, despite warnings from experts. In the same way he created DOGE to force a false “efficiency” of minimal human safety, resulting in preventable deaths (targeting non-whites).

The philosophy of the malignant narcissist isn’t a mystery, the intent to deny/withhold and harm aren’t hidden. Elon Musk repeatedly implies deaths of non-white children will be consistent with his life’s eugenicist mission to generate more white people as quickly as possible.

Killing children is by design, I’m afraid. “Pro-natalists” like Musk claim they aren’t racist, but their pressure to have children is solely focused on white women, while they back policies that literally kill non-white children. He’s a eugenicist.

Tesla killing children in the road thus is the outcome of his racist game, given the majority of people at risk will statistically be non-white. DOGE eliminating USAID is projected to kill at least 3 million non-white people, far greater than Tesla death tolls. Elon Musk is consistent in his plotting to do harm to very specific groups of people.

That’s why you have to understand in the fog of information warfare that Elon Musk makes increasingly absurd claims on purpose, recently promoting the nonsense that Tesla vehicles “won’t crash” in 2025 even as Tesla crash rates have actually accelerated even faster than fleet growth, according to NHTSA data.

Key Observations: Data clearly shows that both serious incidents (orange line) and fatal incidents (pink line) are increasing at a steeper rate than the fleet size growth (blue line). This is particularly evident from 2021 onwards, where: Fleet size (blue) shows a linear growth of about 1x per year. Serious incidents (orange) show an exponential growth curve, reaching nearly 5x by 2024. Fatal incidents (pink) also show a steeper-than-linear growth, though not as dramatic as serious incidents. The divergence between the blue line (fleet growth) and the incident lines (orange and pink) indicates that incidents are indeed accelerating faster than the production/deployment of new vehicles. Source: Tesladeaths.com and NHTSA

Tesla at War, Casualties Mounting

The public deserves better than semantic games. When a vehicle can’t detect a wall or mannequins in the road, the terminology used to market its driver assistance features becomes irrelevant. The question isn’t whether it was “Autopilot” or “Full Self-Driving” that failed, but why Tesla continues to deploy systems with demonstrated safety flaws and fights regulation rather than improving their technology.

As the Tribune.pk article unwittingly reveals, we’re witnessing a coordinated effort to shift discussion from “does this system have a correct outcome” to “which term was used at the moment of failure”. That’s a shell game designed to exhaust and confuse the public while real safety concerns go unaddressed and more and more people die by design.

The truth is simple: if your vehicle that has been vehemently and angrily defended since 2016 as “driverless” still can’t detect a child in the road or a giant wall, the terms don’t really matter. Over 52 people are dead. What matters is Tesla intentionally misleads people, they’re dead, and it shouldn’t be on the road anymore. At this point, Tesla should be recognized as a foreign-backed threat even worse than domestic terrorism, literally…

Czech Gov Claims “Let’s Encrypt” Isn’t Good Enough

See if you can follow the logic, as reported by Lupa.cz.

The reasons for preferring the paid option over the free certificate are essentially two. Let’s Encrypt issues DV certificates with validity limited to only three months. Before the original expires, it’s necessary to deploy a new certificate, which means having a functional ACME client with automation elements set up so that, if possible, the system takes care of this obligation in time by itself. In contrast, commercial certificates are usually issued for at least one year. The IT department thus only needs to remember that once a year, the certificate needs to be replaced.

“In some environments, the implementation of automation through available ACME clients for Let’s Encrypt may not yet be fine-tuned for sufficient reliability, or may not be available at all,” adds the head of the Czech certification authority Alpiro, Antonín Kozan. And he adds a second reason why domain verification is often insufficient for clients.

“Many of our customers realize that in connection with SSL certificates, not only the encryption of communication itself is important, but also the added value in the form of higher credibility with an SSL certificate issued against rigorous verification of the organization. This is crucial for a wide range of organizations from financial or state institutions, established companies, online stores, and other entities that place high emphasis on the higher credibility of SSL certificates with OV or EV,” he concludes.

Sorry, that doesn’t check out for me. Haha, get it? Czech out? It’s the little bits of humor in these troubled times… anyway, ahem, seriously this doesn’t check out. If there’s one place in the world I expect people to use simple, reliable systems for tracking things, it’s Prague. Let me explain why.

First, for a 90 day rotation question the easy technology answer is a proxy or reverse proxy with automated renewal handling. Think of it like a piece of paper you put on your table that keeps track of things so you don’t have to. There are many tools that do this, so I’m hopefully not surprising anyone:

  • Traefik
  • Caddy
  • Nginx Proxy Manager
  • Certbot with cron jobs

All of these deal with Let’s Encrypt renewals even in legacy systems that can’t handle ACME. The proxy safely terminates traffic and safely front-ends systems that remain unaware of certificate management.

Second, with regard to a “need for higher trust” in OV/EV certificates, I’m not sure where they’re getting that from:

  1. Nobody notices or understands any difference in DV, OV, and EV certificates anymore. Is this like a local fan group or special circumstance? Like we only drink beer made from our local creek kind of thing?
  2. Modern browsers removed visual indicators for EV certificates so it’s not like anyone is expected to understand the difference anymore.
  3. The “big” traffic encryption sites like Google and Amazon run DV certificates, and as horrible as they are ethically, they do care about the actual strength of security.

This might all just be a case of doing things the “local” way. Like when I sit in a Prague cellar drinking twelve beers and … remember when I mentioned a piece of paper? The Czechs are known for their “čárky” marks, where the easy thing is the right thing to do apparently.

Tally marks track the beers you’ve had
Measure Čárky Let’s Encrypt
Purpose Track beer consumption Deliver website certificates
Philosophy Simple, transparent, accessible Simple, transparent, accessible
Status Traditional Standard
Alternative Paid vendor (disruptive) Paid vendor (unusual)
Cost None None
Complexity Minimal (pencil, paper) Minimal (automated scripts)
Renewal Every beer (server) Every 90 days (automated)
Resistance From POS vendors Certificate vendors
Effectiveness High value low cost High value low cost

So maybe there’s some kind of financial angle to certification authorities pushing paid products into lined pockets, rather than technical or security concerns? Who really loses what? Who stands opposed to using the standard high value low cost solution?

Properly automated DV certificates from Let’s Encrypt provide the same level of encryption security without the manual renewal overhead and cost. There’s more to this story, that’s all I’m saying. Czech it out.

Trump Calls out Tesla for Domestic Terrorism

“President” Musk has deployed his loyal White House occupant Donald Trump to announce today a shocking new initiative: Tesla deaths, apparently already worse than domestic terrorism, are to be officially increased.

I wish I were kidding. Tesla products causing an alarmingly high-rate of deaths are to be deployed more widely as a matter of some kind of federal priority? We’re hearing a Trump initiative that will kill more Americans, and damage more property, as near as I can tell.

What could possibly be behind this cruel misdirection from the White House, where Trump seems increasingly comfortable serving as an oligarch’s spokesperson instead of an American president? Does anyone remember the style and history of their campaign messaging going back to 2016?

Source: Twitter

The results from this original tryst (2016-2020) have been very clear, given how Tesla “Autopilot” was deregulated enough to go on and kill more people than even domestic terrorist vehicle attacks:

Let’s go now to the Trump stage of 2025 to hear the exact latest clown-around performance.

Donald Trump said he will label violence against Tesla dealerships domestic terrorism as he appeared with Elon Musk, the Tesla CEO, to show support amid recent anti-Tesla protests and the slump in the company’s stock price. Several Tesla vehicles were parked in the driveway of the White House for the US president to pick from, accompanied by Musk and his young son.

The irony is impossible to miss: Trump is ready to label protests against potentially dangerous Tesla vehicles as “domestic terrorism” while standing next to the very man whose products the data suggests might be the bigger threat. But who’s really calling the shots in this bizarre press conference?

Imagine if the White House proudly displayed VBIEDs (Vehicle-Borne Improvised Explosive Devices) in the driveway while American troops were being killed by the same weapons in combat zones.

Teslas notoriously “veer” uncontrollably and crash for “unexplained” reasons. Design defects (e.g. Pinto doors) trap occupants in the explosion that burns everyone to death as horrified witnesses and emergency responders can only watch in horror.

This isn’t just dangerous political theater, it’s moral abdication. When Tesla vehicles are claiming more American lives than domestic terrorism according to statistics, why is our government criminalizing those who raise concerns rather than addressing the clear and present Tesla death danger?

The Trump jelly platform seems disturbingly clear: American lives are apparently worth less than protecting Musk’s fake wealth from his fake stock price.

Furthermore, when I hear Trump talk about a worry that people freely throw “Molotov cocktails” at the authoritarian Tesla brand, a certain history fact comes immediately to mind.

The “Molotov” label comes from Soviet Foreign Minister Vyacheslav Molotov, who had brazenly claimed that bombs exploding in Finnish civilian neighborhoods in 1939 were “humanitarian food deliveries.” The Finns, in their cold and bitter irony, named improvised bottles of fuel lit on fire as “Molotov cocktails”, because they said it was just a “drink” to go with the explosive authoritarian “bread baskets.”

The Soviet “bread basket” bombs of WWII were “cluster” incendiary technology, almost exactly like the Tesla “cluster” of explosive batteries that in effect are incendiary bombs threatening cities around the world now.

Fast forward to today and Trump fills the driveway with machines implicated in hundreds of American deaths saying they deserve special government protection as if Molotov’s bread baskets, while those who protest them with cocktails are “domestic terrorists.” See what I mean about history?

Orwell would recognize Trump’s corrupt use of language immediately. Hopefully it also should be recognized by anyone still able to read 1984 (e.g. Trump’s Secretary of Defense Hegseth has literally ordered Orwell’s books urgently axed from military libraries and reading lists).

I’d say the cruel White House performance of domestic terrorism doublespeak has tell-tale smells of Russia’s Putin influence, but the security community surely by now knows the awful “Musk” of such autocratic theater.

Swasticars: Remote-controlled explosive Musk “bread-baskets” being stockpiled outside major cities around the world. No really, incendiary cluster bombs really are about delivering food to the needy. Really. Molotov promised.

Kansas Trump Loyalists Branded “Radical Leftists” Crushed by Federal Government

Ouch. It hurts even to watch when a hot brand hits the bare flesh of an exposed ass.

The Kansas farmers who enthusiastically voted for Trump are being conveniently and fraudulently branded as “far-left radicals” in order to crash their lives. Did you guess who would be experiencing firsthand the tragic consequences of their misplaced ballot-box decisions? The same rural counties that delivered soul crushing 85-90% margins for Trump (Wallace, Sheridan, and Ness) are watching signed contracts invalidated, promised funds vanished, by a pack of political liars.

Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins has been ordered to freeze payments for falsely branded “far-left programs,” stupidly reclassifying mainstream agricultural work as radicalism overnight.

I’m sure the brains behind this operation are tweedle dumb and tweedle dumber in Silicon Valley (Vance and Musk) who hope to totally collapse the agricultural sector, creating an inflationary crisis to literally kill off farmers… just to force federal funds redirected to an army of defective Tesla robots, which are guaranteed to fail harder than the Ellison-Musk Hawaii farming disaster.

In case you missed it, these geniuses put a cancer doctor in charge of a Tesla solar-powered farm on an extremely windy island. The Tesla tech failed, leading to a massive dirty diesel dependency, while the farm was destroyed by…wind. Wind! They literally burned through $500 million for nothing, instead of using a windmill. $500 million! Nuts.

Decades of death and destruction lay ahead for Kansas now, just like Tesla announcing in 2016 they would have driverless solved by 2017, or SpaceX declaring in 2016 they would be landing on Mars by 2018. None of that came true but Elon Musk used the fraud (leaving a trail of deaths and debris) to sponge up taxpayer money for a decade, enough to fund Trump’s hostile takeover of federal government.

Let’s be clear about what’s happening: a president convicted of 34 felony counts who campaigned on hate and destruction of relationships is now breaking government contracts with his most loyal supporters, while trying to enrich a few elites even more racist than him.

The poor, victimized farmers, having voted overwhelmingly for a big city slick con artist who built his reputation on abuse, stiffing contractors and refusing to pay his debts, say they didn’t realize MAGA’s platform of cruel destruction of American lives included them.

Bill Shaw of Ashland, who deployed some of Elon Musk’s favorite tech under a $600,000 federal contract, now faces financial disaster after the White House labelled the very concept of paying government debts as “far-left” and therefore cancelled. “I don’t understand how that’s possible,” Shaw told reporters, as if Trump’s decades-long history of breaking the law and defrauding partners wouldn’t continue.

The likelihood of farmers receiving accountability or restitution, like anyone else victimized by the fraud of Trump, is virtually non-existent. The same administration they voted for has systematically stacked the courts, appointed loyalists to oversight positions, and gutted government watchdogs. You think Elon Musk keeps his job because he has any merit? It’s fraud all the way down. Tyranny by foreign-born coastal elites never looked so clear in the American heartland.

This isn’t just politics as usual—it’s a stark lesson in the lack of American consequences for gross deliberate fraud against loyal and hard-working voters.

We’re witness to one of the biggest integrity breaches in American history. Rural Kansas farmers have been totally swindled by a racist and mysogynist convicted criminal given the reins of federal programs. They tied their fortunes to a flashy big hat foreign-backed long-time enemy of America, and are now expressing surprise that their money is all gone in an instant.

Related: Trump, Vance and Musk are really big into the crypto scams like this one that rip-off Americans.

…Kansas bank CEO Shan Hanes was sentenced to 24 years after stealing $47 million from customer accounts and wiring the money to cryptocurrency accounts run by scammers.

Were those accounts being run by Trump? The FBI now likely wouldn’t even dare to find out.

As the Kansan loyalists to Trump struggle under abruptly politicized contracts cancelled and destroyed futures, perhaps the hardest pill to swallow will be that they enthusiastically voted for this giant bag of dicks assaulting them with total agricultural industry destruction.