SAINT for Slaughter: How Netflix “In Waves and War” Buries Hegseth War Crimes

On New Year’s Day 2025, Green Beret Matthew Livelsberger penned manifestos testifying against war crimes, and then exploded himself in a Cybertruck outside Trump Hotel.

Source: Twitter

Ten months later, Netflix released “In Waves and War“—a documentary about Navy SEALs using psychedelic therapy for war trauma.

Livelsberger, perhaps the most important war trauma figure in recent headlines, isn’t even mentioned.

Matthew Livelsberger: awarded five Bronze Stars, including one with a valor device for courage under fire, a combat infantry badge and an Army Commendation Medal with valor. Source: U.S. Army

One month before Netflix release, Dr. Nolan Williams—the Stanford neuroscientist whose research anchors the film about preventing suicide—died by suicide at 43. The documentary released anyway, without any mention or memorial, burying his death in passing.

These erasures reveal what the film actually is: propaganda offering medical absolution without moral accountability.

Two Warriors, Two Types of Trauma

American special operations aren’t monolithic. Selection and training create fundamentally different soldiers:

Navy SEALs: Selected for aggression and ability to bond intensely with small units. Trained for direct action—raids, assassinations, surgical strikes. Brief deployments killing high-value targets. Minimal cultural engagement. Team bonds become absolute; questioning the mission forbidden. Cultivated into “Christian holy warriors” fighting evil—a self-concept openly weaponized by Pete Hegseth, Trump’s Defense Secretary nominee, who successfully lobbied for pardons of convicted war criminals, defended CIA torture, advocated bombing Iranian cultural sites, and attacked the International Criminal Court for investigating American war crimes. His view: “They’re not war criminals, they’re warriors” constrained by “academic rules of engagement” that are “tying the hands of our warfighters.”

Navy SEAL Was Promoted Two Months After He Allegedly Killed a Green Beret

Green Berets: Selected for intelligence and cultural sensitivity. Trained for foreign internal defense—advising, training, building relationships. Long deployments embedded with local forces. Deep cultural knowledge required. Strategic thinking encouraged.

This doesn’t even account for Delta Force, CIA paramilitaries, and other units. But these two alone produce fundamentally different psychological wounds:

SEALs suffer narcissistic injury. Their training creates illusions of invincibility and righteousness. Trauma hits when reality intrudes: teammates die, operations fail, they get injured. They ask: “Why wasn’t I good enough? How do I avenge my brother?” The rage points inward or at the enemy—never at the mission. This makes them perfect instruments for Hegseth’s vision: warriors who can torture prisoners, kill civilians, and target cultural sites without facing consequences.

Killer Navy SEAL Hires Trump Lawyer to Reduce His Jail Time

Green Berets suffer moral injury. Their training creates cultural awareness. Trauma hits when they realize the mission’s nature: allies abandoned, promises broken, communities destroyed, civilian casualties covered up. They ask: “Did I betray people who trusted me? Was this war unjust? Did I participate in war crimes?” The crisis is existential and systemic.

One trauma type can be treated without questioning empire. The other cannot.

SAINT: Cheap Grace as Neuroscience

Central to the medical credibility of the movie is Dr. Nolan Williams, apparently from a very religious community, who developed Stanford Accelerated Intelligent Neuromodulation Therapy—SAINT.

His religious branding of mental healthcare isn’t subtle.

SAINT is electromagnetic brain stimulation to treat PTSD. Results in Special Operations veterans (spoiler alert) show phenomenal results:

  • 83% PTSD remission
  • 73% depression remission

And I’ll be honest, the veterans in the movie are very visibly different after treatment. Their eyes literally shift from sullen, dark, empty sockets into being lit up again. The treatment seems to work—for narcissistic injury. In fact, the stories told from the hallucinogenic episodes are about deeply embedded sense of personal fears and injuries.

It never seems to rise above and ask: What did you do? Were your killings justified? Do you owe amends?

SEALs feel better, symptoms resolve, they return to function. Perfect for “my team got hurt” trauma. Useless—worse than useless—for “I participated in evil” trauma. That’s not healing; that’s spiritual bypass, removing the pain that might lead to repentance.

Dietrich Bonhoeffer, martyred for resisting Nazis, distinguished cheap grace (absolution without transformation) from costly grace (forgiveness requiring confession, repentance, restitution, fundamental change).

SAINT is thus cheap grace medicalized.

I am certain Williams understood this, and I worry that it was too much to bear. Many of his close friends were devout Christians. He called the work “holy” and met colleagues at Stanford’s chapel.

But in clinical sessions with 30 Special Operations veterans, he heard confessions bound by confidentiality: what they’d done, where, to whom. He knew things that constituted war crimes. And then he watched his treatment provide relief without requiring moral transformation.

For a true Christian, this creates impossible tension and dangerous trauma: If you successfully treat PTSD in someone who committed atrocities, enabling them to feel better without repentance, have you saved them or damned them?

Williams killed himself one month before Netflix pushed his work to global audiences.

The War Crimes Livelsberger Exposed Are Happening Again

In October 2025, Four-Star Admiral Alvin Holsey resigned abruptly as SOUTHCOM Commander rather than continue overseeing what Pentagon officials are calling “criminal attacks on civilians.”

Hegseth celebrated the killings: “11 narco-terrorists at the bottom of the Caribbean.”

But Associated Press reporters went to Venezuela and identified who was actually killed. Not “narco-terrorists.” The dead included: a fisherman, a down-on-his-luck bus driver, a former military cadet, laborers, a motorcycle driver. Most were crewing boats for the first or second time, making $500 per trip to escape crushing poverty.

The U.S. government released no information about who they killed. Families can’t hold funerals for fear of reprisal.

This is dehumanization as policy: call them “narco-terrorists,” execute without trial, celebrate as victory, release no information, prevent mourning.

Admiral Holsey walked away rather than participate. Four-star admirals don’t resign mid-tour unless they believe they’re being ordered to commit war crimes. He can’t speak publicly without violating classification, but his resignation is testimony.

This isn’t speculation about future policy. The extrajudicial killings are happening now.

The Mexico Irony

The documentary also provides surface level tension about ibogaine treatment in Mexico. At one point a SEAL refers to it as “hippy” stuff, a reference directly to President Nixon’s criminalization of political opponents by accusing them of drug use. The circular reasoning is almost poetic:

  1. U.S. prosecutes racist and authoritarian War on Drugs
  2. Sends SEALs to kill “narco” targets in Latin America
  3. SEALs get traumatized trying to destroy the narcotics market
  4. Psychedelics remain Schedule I (criminalized by drug war)
  5. SEALs travel to Mexico for treatment using ibogaine (derived from African indigenous medicine)
  6. SEALs return healed
  7. Netflix celebrates this as innovation

The people SEALs killed get no documentary. Communities destroyed by their racist drug war get no treatment. Indigenous knowledge is extracted without credit. But then SEALs need healing journeys in Mexican clinics, and use medicine from traditions the U.S. spent decades destroying, to recover from operations possibly conducted in that very country.

They killed the narco market participants, then begged the narco market for cure, because their own country criminalized the medicine…leading to war crimes, which arguably caused the trauma, which now funds the narco market.

What Livelsberger Witnessed

Matthew Livelsberger served as a Green Beret in Afghanistan. He witnessed civilian casualties from drone strikes—testimony that aligns with UN investigations and documented ROE violations. His story of trauma and PTSD from war crimes reads fundamentally different from these SEALs still trying to process losing a SEAL.

He became a whistleblower risk.

His final communications contained two distinct threads: credible, detailed testimony about war crimes in Afghanistan drone operations, and physically impossible claims about gravity propulsion drones. The latter follows a classic counterintelligence pattern—contaminating real testimony with fantastic claims to destroy credibility. Livelsberger may have recognized the manipulation; as he kept the claims separate, suggesting he understood someone may have wanted to discredit him.

His death on New Year’s Day—Cybertruck, Trump Hotel, manifestos about war crimes—may have been a desperate attempt to force attention to his testimony before it was completely buried under “crazy gravity drive guy” narrative. He had recognized his own deteriorating state, describing symptoms just like in the film about SEALs.

His plan worked partially. Media focused on the exotic technology claims and his “mental health crisis,” not the war crimes. Officials could dismiss him as troubled. His credible testimony about civilian casualties got memory-holed. Elon Musk personally attacked him and ridiculed him.

“In Waves and War” now erases him entirely. Recognition for a Green Beret whistleblower who testified about war crimes before killing himself would require the film to confront what the incoming administration explicitly wants to normalize. Pete Hegseth successfully lobbied Trump to pardon Army Lt. Clint Lorance (convicted of murdering two unarmed Afghan civilians) and Army Maj. Mathew Golsteyn (admitted to killing an unarmed Afghan), and to reverse the demotion of Navy SEAL Edward Gallagher (convicted of posing with a corpse after being charged with stabbing a teenage ISIS prisoner to death and shooting civilians).

Hegseth’s argument:

You train someone to go and fight and kill the enemy, then they kill the enemy the way someone doesn’t like, and then we put them in jail.

Livelsberger testified about these exact practices. The film erases him because including him requires confronting:

  • Moral injury from witnessing/participating in atrocities, not just from losing teammates
  • The system actively working to silence and discredit whistleblowers
  • Some trauma that can’t be treated because it requires systemic accountability
  • The incoming Defense Secretary who wants to pardon those who commit the crimes Livelsberger witnessed

One narrative serves recruitment and continued operations. One demands accountability and change.

The Propaganda Structure

The film presents as compassionate veteran mental health advocacy. It functions as:

  • Reputation management for SEALs facing war crimes allegations (Eddie Gallagher, others)
  • Commercial for Magnus Medical’s SAINT devices
  • Recruitment tool (military “takes care of warriors”)
  • Reframing perpetrators as victims
  • Erasure of moral injury and accountability

By focusing exclusively on SEALs (not Green Berets), symptoms (not causes), individual healing (not systemic change), it performs brilliant ideological work of disinformation: we sympathize with traumatized warriors without asking what traumatized the people they killed.

The Satanic Inversion

This seems important because the film has a buried Christian warrior message. Not satanic as cartoons—pentagrams and goats—but in theological sense: a system inverting good and evil, offering false salvation, appearing as angel of light, leading away from repentance toward comfortable complicity.

Structure:

True prophets (Livelsberger) demanding costly grace (confession, change) get martyred and erased.

Unwilling false prophets (Williams) create false salvation (SAINT) for holy warriors (SEALs) who committed sins (war crimes) but receive cheap grace (healing without repentance) and are celebrated (Netflix).

Meanwhile: Latin Americans killed in drug war—no documentary. Afghans betrayed—no treatment. Indigenous communities whose medicine was stolen—no credit. Green Beret who refused complicity—erased. Doctor who saw the moral impossibility—dead.

The film uses religious language (SAINT, redemption, holy warriors) while evacuating religious content (sin, repentance, transformation, justice). It steals indigenous medicine to maintain imperial warriors who feel better about empire, and calls this progress.

What Should Have Been Said

The honest documentary:

Working-class kids are shaped into aggressive instruments, sent on dubious operations in unjust wars. When teammates die and illusions shatter, they’re traumatized. The military refuses effective treatment because psychedelics are criminalized by the same War on Drugs that deployed them. They travel to countries they operated in, using stolen indigenous medicine, receiving treatment that relieves symptoms without moral reckoning. The system uses them twice: in wars, then in healing propaganda. Green Berets experiencing moral injury get no treatment in this sorry arc—their trauma requires confronting American empire. One refused the narrative and made his suicide political testimony; we don’t mention him, or that war crimes may buried by hallucinogens. The doctor providing cheap grace to war criminals killed himself before release; we celebrate his innovations anyway. Nothing changes, except for those “healed” through unaccountability.

That film never gets made.

Conclusion

Three testimonies from the dead and silenced:

Matthew Livelsberger: Green Beret whistleblower who witnessed war crimes in Afghanistan, was targeted by counterintelligence to discredit him, died trying to ensure his testimony survived.

Nolan Williams: Christian doctor who couldn’t reconcile providing cheap grace to warriors who may have committed atrocities, died one month before his work reached Netflix.

Admiral Alvin Holsey: Four-star admiral who resigned rather than oversee “criminal attacks on civilians”—can’t speak publicly but his resignation is testimony.

All three inconvenient to the machinery of empire. The first two dead, the third silenced by classification.

Livelsberger testified about practices Hegseth has now normalized. Hegseth got Trump to pardon Lorance (murdered unarmed Afghans), Golsteyn (killed unarmed Afghan), reverse Gallagher’s demotion (stabbed prisoner). His defense: warriors who kill “the way someone doesn’t like” shouldn’t face prosecution.

Now Hegseth is Defense Secretary. He’s already fired senior officers who might object. He’s already celebrating “11 narco-terrorists at the bottom of the Caribbean”—extrajudicial killings without trial. Admiral Holsey walked away rather than continue. Pentagon officials call them “criminal attacks on civilians.”

Meanwhile, Netflix releases a documentary showing SEALs getting SAINT treatment and ibogaine therapy. Beautiful cinematography. Stirring music. Healing journeys. Medical absolution through neuroscience and psychedelics.

The people they killed remain invisible. The whistleblowers discredited or silenced. The war crimes not only unquestioned but actively celebrated and expanded. The Christian holy warriors redeemed through cheap grace, ready to “stack bodies” under a Defense Secretary who says “put us all in jail” if these are crimes—knowing no one will.

This isn’t a story about healing. It’s how empire maintains warriors: break them through violence, silence those who witness crimes, heal the compliant ones just enough to redeploy them, pardon the ones who get caught, purge officers who object, celebrate the killings, eliminate oversight, repeat.

The pattern is identical to Nixon’s Operation CONDOR. The Church Committee exposed it then. And let’s not forget the CIA hallucinogenic operations MKULTRA.

Where is Senator Church when you need him now?

Christians call this stuff demonic. That’s unfortunately not spelled out in the film.

For Matthew Livelsberger, Nolan Williams, and Admiral Alvin Holsey—whose testimonies, whether through death or resignation, speak truths the current system won’t acknowledge.

Science Solves for Anger: “What fuels or douses rage?”

Apparently, calm is what cures anger.

  • Of all the negative emotions, anger is the one people have the most difficulty regulating.
  • Activities that decrease arousal (e.g., breathing, meditating, yoga) decrease anger.
  • Popular wisdom suggests that venting reduces anger and aggression, but it does not.
  • Going for a run is good for your heart, but it is not good for managing anger.

Science!

MN Tesla Kills One in 3am Intersection Crash

This report has the hallmarks of Autopilot failing again.

A Tesla “was at a high rate of speed” when it exited from eastbound Interstate 94 to Dale Street, according to a State Patrol incident report. The vehicle collided with a Toyota RAV4 crossing the intersection at 2:56 a.m. Wednesday.

Benjamin Michael Villano, the 31-year-old driver of the Toyota, died at Regions Hospital, the State Patrol said. He was from St. Paul.

It’s Irrational to Claim Thaler Founded Behavioral Economics

A recent article in Behavioral Scientist presents Richard Thaler as the founder of behavioral economics. This is misinformation.

Thaler was effective at packaging and promoting psychological research in ways that economics couldn’t ignore, while he most certainly did NOT discover human irrationality.

Common sense, right? Claiming someone recently discovered human irrationality is itself irrational… the latest evidence confirming ancient theories of human irrationality.

More specifically, making claims about “observing that people are influenced” – the fundamental insight that context and framing affect decisions – definitely is NOT Thaler’s invention.

Herbert Simon won a Nobel in 1978 (before Thaler even started) for work on bounded rationality. Kahneman and Tversky’s prospect theory was then presented in 1979. An endowment effect was documented by Thaler, yet the fundamental psychology of loss aversion came from Kahneman and Tversky. Going back earlier, researchers like Ward Edwards in the 1950s-60s presented psychological research on decision-making that challenged expected utility theory. And we really should include Smith, Wollstonecraft, Kant and Hume (published extensively that human reasoning isn’t purely rational calculation), as I wrote here in 2016, about some of my work in 2014.

I say this because nobody should be calling Thaler the founder of behavioral economics (he helped establish a distinct field in economics, but absolutely didn’t invent the ideas or lay the foundation). The article frames “anomalies” as Thaler’s discovery, despite economists and psychologists documenting violations of rational choice theory for decades. And then, insult to injury, the article says Imas’ career progression is defined by some weird proximity to Thaler (“once a distant role model… now a friend and collaborator”).

With propagandist articles like this, it’s no wonder economists are skeptical of behavioral theory as glorification of propagandists.

The misinformation serves a specific function: it centers credit within economics (and specifically at Chicago, infamous for hero seeking radical individualism) rather than acknowledging that economics was VERY late to recognize what other disciplines already knew and shared with them.

Thaler’s actual contribution was politics and marketing of others’ work to fit his own sphere of influence (erasing them), NOT discovery.

Historians, popping immodest economist bubbles since… forever.

I mean historians see through the fog of Chicago immediately because we trace actual intellectual genealogies rather than mythologized “founding fathers” trying to prove themselves weird ubermensch. The economist version is institutional hagiography, and false heroism, NOT history.

Philosophy (18th-19th c): Humans aren’t rational calculators.

Psychology (1950s-1970s): Empirical demonstration of systematic deviations from rationality.

Chicago (1980s+): “Ooh, look at what we found others talking about. Can we get someone around here to take credit for discovering them, and rebrand it anomalies?!”

The mythology machine creates a hero narrative where Thaler is the lone genius challenging orthodoxy, rather than what actually happened, to fit the Chicago mental model of radical white male individualism.

They can’t bring themselves to admit a story where knowledge emerges collectively and collaboratively across disciplines.

God forbid the ruling men of Chicago recognize that women and non-economists did foundational work. Women? Could you imagine, Chicago school dudes giving credit to women? Where’s the credit for Sarah Lichtenstein’s work on preference reversals that directly challenged rational choice? For Eleanor Rosch’s prototype theory that explained how people actually categorize? For developmental psychologists studying children’s economic reasoning? For Baruch Fischhoff’s work on hindsight bias and risk perception?

Progress happens through institutions slowly correcting errors, yet Chicago instead waits at the top of a tree for scraps like a vulture hoping to spin a narrative about being the apex predator. Imagine economists admitting it was fundamentally wrong and learning from outsiders?

The Thaler propaganda is to curate a lone genius, bravely challenging orthodoxy from within, founding a new field through individual brilliance. That’s the same bogus narrative structure as their whole economic theory – the heroic individual entrepreneur disrupting markets like a God above mere mortals. It’s circular and self-serving mythology.