Newly Declassified: How MacArthur’s War Against Intelligence Killed His Own Men

Petty rivalries, personality clashes, and bureaucratic infighting in the SIGINT corps may have changed the course of WWII.

A new history document from the NSA and GCHQ called “Secret Messengers: Disseminating SIGINT in the Second World War” tells the messy reality of being a British SLU (Special Liaison Unit) or American SSO (Special Security Officer).

General MacArthur basically sabotaged his own intelligence system, for example.

…by 1944 the U.S. was decoding more than 20,000 messages a month filled with information about enemy movements, strategy, fortifications, troop strengths, and supply convoys.

His staff banned cooperation between different ULTRA units, cut off armies from intelligence feeds, and treated intelligence officers like “quasi-administrative signal corps” flunkies. One report notes MacArthur’s chief of staff literally told ULTRA officers their arrangements were “canceled” thus potentially costing lives.

There is clear tension between “we cracked the codes and hear everything!” and “our own people won’t listen”.

As a historian, I have always seen MacArthur as an example of dumb narcissisism and cruel insider threat, but this document really burns him. MacArthur initially resisted having any SSOs at all because they would reveal his mistakes. Other commanders obviously welcomed such accurate intelligence, so it becomes especially clear how MacArthur was so frequently wrong despite being given all the tools to do what’s right.

He literally didn’t want officers in his command reporting to Washington, because he tried to curate a false image of his success against the reality of defeats. And he obsessed about a “long-standing grudge against Marshall” from WWI. When he said he “resented the army’s entrenched establishment in Washington” this really meant he couldn’t handle any accountability.

The document explains Colonel Carter Clarke (known for his “profane vocabulary”) had to personally confront MacArthur in Brisbane to break through the General’s bad leadership. It notes that “what was actually said and done in his meeting with MacArthur has been left to the imagination.”

The General should have been fired right then and there. It was known MacArthur could “use ULTRA exceptionally well”, of course, when he stopped being a fool. Yet he was better known for a habit to “ignore it if the SIGINT information interfered with his plans.” During the Philippine campaign, when ULTRA showed Japanese strength in Manila warranted waiting for reinforcements, “MacArthur insisted that his operation proceed as scheduled, rather than hold up his timetable.”

Awful.

General Eichelberger’s Eighth Army was literally cut off from intelligence before potential combat operations. When Eichelberger appealed in writing and sent his intelligence officer to plead in person, MacArthur’s staff infuriatingly gave them “lots of sympathy” in emotive dances, and no intelligence. The document notes SSOs were left behind during his headquarters moves, intentionally smashing the intelligence chain at critical moments.

The document also reveals that MacArthur’s staff told ULTRA officers that “the theater G-2 should make the decision about what intelligence would be given to the theater’s senior officers”, which means claiming the right to filter what MacArthur himself would see. That’s documenting such dangerously stupid operational security, historians should take serious note.

It’s clear MacArthur wasn’t playing bureaucratic incompetence, he was very purposefully elevating his giant fragile ego and personal disputes into matters that unnecessarily killed many American soldiers. Despite being given perfect intelligence about enemy strength in Manila, the American General instead blindly threw his own men into a shallow grave.

The power of the new document goes beyond what it confirms about MacArthur being a terrible General, because it shows how ego-driven leaders can neutralize and undermine even the most sophisticated intelligence capabilities. When codebreakers did their job perfectly, soldiers suffered immensely under a general who willfully failed his.

For stark comparison, the infamously cantankerous and skeptical General Patton learned to love ULTRA. Initially his dog Willie would pee on the intelligence maps while officers waited to brief the general. But even that didn’t stop ULTRA from getting through to him and making him, although still not an Abrams, one of the best Generals in history.

General Patton in England with his M-20 and British rescue dog Willie, named for a boy he met while feeding the poor during the depression. Source: US Army Archives

Starbucks Korea Bans Privacy

I suppose Starbucks could have just charged more to upsell personal space. Instead they seem to have banned people bringing any sort of privacy devices into the cafe.

The move targets a small but persistent group of clients known as “cagongjok.” The term blends the Korean words for cafe and study tribe. It refers to people who work or study for hours in coffee shops.

Most use only laptops. But Starbucks says some have been setting up large monitors, printers and even cubicle-style dividers.

Source: Twitter

Honestly, if they had just started selling the privacy dividers, or at least renting them for a premium, they would have probably made more money and had happier customers.

The story is perhaps notable because Meta, which was renamed at great expense to chase a bogus metaverse and VR nonsense, has been dumping itself into stupid privacy violating surveillance “glasses”. When you think about it, nobody really wants to be the Harry Caul of today. They want privacy, not total power over anyone who wants privacy.

1974 American mystery thriller film written, produced, and directed by Francis Ford Coppola and starring Gene Hackman, John Cazale, Allen Garfield, Cindy Williams, Frederic Forrest, Harrison Ford, Teri Garr, and Robert Duvall.

The smart response to papparazzi tech is physical privacy dividers, a logical and superior future. It’s almost like reinvention of the Victorian cafe. Why see or be seen in any public spaces if you want to remain comfortably safe from institutional capture?

On a related note, people walk around and sit in cafes with audio noise cancelling headphones. They can’t hear you and they aren’t talking. Why shouldn’t they try to put up simple vision noise cancelling barriers too? They don’t want to see you, and they don’t want to strap anything to their head.

GA Tesla in “Veered” Crash Into Gas Station and Multiple Vehicles

That’s a lot of damage from one Tesla losing control. It reads like a battle report.

The Hall County Sheriff’s Office said the crash occurred just before 11:30 a.m. Thursday when the driver of a Tesla Model 3 was traveling northbound on Falcon Parkway when he left his travel lane and struck a raised concrete curb at the intersection of Martin Road. The vehicle then vaulted over a drainage ditch and struck a small tree on the property.

After hitting the tree, the vehicle then launched from a pile of dirt at the base of the tree and landed on top of a Dodge Caravan, which was parked at the convenience store. The tesla then continued uncontrolled into a support beam on an awning covering gas pumps, which caused part of the structure to collapse.

In the process, a gas pump was knocked free from its base, striking a Honda Accord parked at the pumps. Debris from the Tesla damaged two more vehicles, according to HCSO.

Telsa collapsed the Exxon Circle K canopy over its pumps on Thursday, Aug. 14, 2025. Source: William Daughtry

Hit a tree yet still launched and landed on top of a van?

Tesla Owner Tries to Blame AI for Mistakes and Gets Banned From Driving

A Tesla owner wasn’t paying attention, blew speed limits by double, and then tried to argue in court that AI is to blame for any mistakes. The court disagreed.

The court said in its ruling that “it is in any case the defendant’s obligation to be aware of the speed limit at all times, and that it would be negligent to rely blindly on the car’s technical systems being correctly set. The court therefore finds it proven beyond any reasonable doubt that the defendant acted as described in the indictment, and that he at the very least acted with gross negligence. He is therefore convicted in accordance with the charges.