North Korea Has Been Buying Weapons From Texas

Here’s the buried lede in a story about North Korea gaming America’s famously bulletproof gun regulations to bypass sanctions:

[The foreign student named Wen who overstayed his visa, just like Elon Musk did,] purchased a firearms business in Houston with money from a North Korean contact, and drove the weapons from Texas to California, where they were arranged to be shipped. Last September, Wen bought around 60,000 rounds of 9mm ammunition with plans to ship them to North Korea.

Houston, come in. Do you copy?

Because apparently Houston does NOT copy. In fact, Houston seems to have missed the memo entirely about maybe—just maybe—doing a background check before selling someone a whole firearms business.

Let me get this straight: A foreign student on an expired visa walks into Texas, buys a gun store with money from one of America’s top geopolitical enemies, loads up 60,000 rounds of ammunition, and drives it all to California for international shipping to a nuclear-armed dictatorship. And the only thing that stopped this operation was… well, it’s unclear anything actually did stop it initially.

What’s next, Tesla relocates their infamously racist and dangerous factories to Texas?

This reads like a satirical screenplay that got rejected for being too unrealistic. “Nobody would believe Texas laws are THIS lax,” the studio executives would say, tossing the script in the trash.

But here we are, living in a world where “foreign agent arms dealer” is apparently just another small business opportunity in the great lone state of Texas. No questions asked, no background checks that actually work, just good old-fashioned Chinese entrepreneurship—with a light sprinkling of international weapons trafficking to keep things interesting.

The only thing more predictable than this happening is the inevitable response: “Clearly we need fewer regulations to prevent this failure to regulate.”

Houston, we have a problem. And that problem is that Houston doesn’t seem to think it has a problem.

How Ethics Breaks Linear Thinkers

Think about the very concept of “waxing” and “waning” of a moon in orbital cycle. Such predictable rotation is mischaracterized by linear and momentary perspectives on what is fundamentally cyclical and relational.

It’s like a wheel being described as “going up” or “going down” when the wheel’s nature is rotation itself. The idea of modern flight is an apt metaphor too, if you can imagine describing lift without gravity, or up without down.

Dynamic equilibrium makes flight possible. Just look at penguins under water. Yeah, I’m talking about the flying penguin.

This connects deeply to a new article by Drew Dalton about ethics called “Reality is evil“. He makes a fascinating but ultimately flawed argument about just one aspect of thermodynamic reality (entropy, decay), unfairly declaring it the fundamental truth, while dismissing the other aspect (the emergence of complexity, life, consciousness) as mere illusion.

This is exactly the kind of unbalanced linear thinking that should and can be avoided in ethics. Dalton writes:

Everything eats and is eaten. Everything destroys and is destroyed.

But do you notice how he frames this cycle as purely destructive, rather than recognizing the relationships, the very mechanisms by which complexity and beauty emerge? Yes, entropy increases in closed systems, and yet Earth isn’t a closed system. We have constant energy input from the sun. The “destruction” he describes is also the creative process by which simple hydrogen becomes stars, stars create heavier elements, and those elements organize into the intricate dance of life.

His big ethical conclusion to “strike back at the Universe” is highly misleading and overly linear. He’s created a false opposition between human flourishing and natural processes, when in fact our capacity for love, art, healing, and meaning-making emerges from and through these very processes he calls evil.

It reminds me of when security professionals first start their career and have to be constantly reminded how business growth factors into any risk equations — they have to learn how and why the organization exists to create value, not just avoid harm.

What would an ethics look like that truly grasped the cyclical nature? Perhaps one that sees our role not as imperialist fighters against nature, but as conscious participants to curate ongoing creative-destructive dancing of existence itself.

Without Fraud, There Would be No Tesla

The American market regulation system is so broken, it has taken ten years and hundreds of unnecessary deaths for mainstream reporters to start admitting Tesla is a fraud.

It wasn’t true then and still isn’t.

From hyperloops to solar roofs to trillion-dollar savings from federal budget cuts by DOGE, Musk has developed a reputation for excessive boasts and telling outright whoppers. For years, that habit hasn’t been a big problem for his companies, his image or wealth, but it’s shaping up to be one for Tesla, already stung by a 13% drop in its global EV sales in the first half of 2025.

The world’s “richest” man is basically generating wealth from fraud, which America is slow to act on.

Tesla drivers can pursue class action over self-driving claims, judge rules… The California classes include drivers who bought the Full Self-Driving package from May 19, 2017, to July 31, 2024, and opted out of Tesla’s arbitration agreement, and drivers who bought the package from October 20, 2016, to May 19, 2017.

If you squint your eyes you can see the Elon