Jeremiah asked and I did my best to answer without getting wrapped around the axle because he bragged to me about buying a big American car during the fuel price rise.
Here is my response:
Well, maybe you knew I couldn’t resist commenting on your automobile engine analogy. I’m still laughing from the time last year you told me ‘when gas prices went up, prices on Suburbans went way down, so I bought one to drive my five miles to work’. Clearly we still don’t see eye-to-eye on managing risk.
You say “the United States ruled the automotive industry; an industry we created from a machine we invented”. For brevity sake I’ll concede the industry was largely built by the US (not created) but I can’t let you assert that the machine was invented in the US. The engines of steam, electric, internal combustion, diesel; all were invented outside the US in the 1800s. I mean by comparison the US at that time was stuck in a rut over whether slavery was a viable engine to power its industrial production!
Yeah, ok, I know Ford gets lots of credit for ramping up his assembly line and blowing a whistle at his workers, but even that was an application of British automation developed and built 100 years earlier to support the quality and speed necessary for their military during the Napoleonic wars. Imagine watching a steam engine-driven system in 1808 that produced over 100 thousand blocks (pulleys) for the Navy. The Block Mills of Portsmouth proved that with an assembly line and machines just 10 men were made able to work as quickly as 100.
More to the point you say “The trend is that we (in the U.S.) invent something new, create an industry around it.” That seems to skip right past the fact that most industries in the US were started by European immigrants based on European ideas in place for many years before the US copied them. From Budweiser to Champagne, Cheddar Cheese to Chandeliers, what the US has really done well is bring down the price of goods and make them more accessible. In fact, that was an obsessive element to the Nixon administration that success would be determined entirely by the availability of goods. A steak on every table. And it’s true our shelves were stocked our pantries full while others in the world were still paying more for fewer goods, but somewhere in that heady explosion of prosperity out of the 1900s the US lost its sight of quality as a measure of success in “efficiency”.
You bought that Suburban, you said, because you perceived value, right? Did you feel like you were buying innovation? Quality? Maybe a trip to a car show to look at the latest models (all outside the US now) will change your perspective:
â€œIf it seems as though German manufacturers are on the leading edge of new, gas-free urban transportation solutions, it is due in no small part to the European Unionâ€™s strict pollution controls. â€˜Today, all the innovation in the auto industry is coming from the German manufacturersâ€¦A little from Japan. None from the U.S.â€™â€
NONE from the US. Our amazing ideas of â€œefficiencyâ€ apparently were not so.
I mean a four-door all-wheel-drive station wagon made by Volvo is expected to be available next year that delivers better horsepower than a Ferrari 308 and a Camaro Z28, yet will also provide 100 mpg. That should have been an American made vehicle. No reason that it could not have been built and sold here. We have the weather, the open roads, the crap to haul around. Oh, no reason except people were for some reason still buying Suburbans. You know I could go on about this forever and someday I MAY convert you to a highly resilient low-risk source of energy for transportation, even if I have to do it on the matâ€¦but Iâ€™ll try to get back to the point of your post.
I think your definition of software may be too narrow. You say â€œsoftware must be built by highly skilled people, whose skills are not trained up quickly or easily.â€ But isnâ€™t that the very opposite of what is causing so many problems in code? Code is being written by many more people less trained and using toolkits. It is based on a massive rise in the amount of shared/borrowed/stolen code available. I see this most in recent cases of malware mutations â€” so many more people developing (or at least modifying) more code more rapidly than ever. The mobile app stores are another example. Anyone with a cheap personal computer and a few online tutorials now is in place to build and release software to hundreds of millions of users. Compare that to the training, samples and platforms of twenty years ago. Software is just flying off the wires now and itâ€™s going to get even faster as more remote areas are connected.
You say â€œthose who profit by the billions from creating software, like Microsoft, Oracle, and Adobe seem unable to ship multi-million line software projects on a deadlineâ€. Youâ€™re looking at the wrong sources of innovation. Thatâ€™s like criticizing the British Navy for deploying ships late (a critique as old as the British Navy â€” special note to the Falklands War deployment, which led to the development of ITIL). While the Navy isnâ€™t going away and will continue to find ways to automate production, they are solving massively complex problems. The future of software build efficiency is less about the big guys just like ship building an ocean-going vessel for the masses is at a much smaller scale today. The lessons learned from the big expensive mistakes are applied faster, better and at smaller scales of automation.
So, Iâ€™d be one to argue yes, we know how not only to make software but hundreds of millions of people know how to save time by learning from the innovation of others â€” sharing knowledge and tools to reduce build times. Iâ€™d be happy to go more into the myths of commodity and innovation. I also would like to clarify trends and real numbers but Iâ€™ll leave those for another day (e.g. Todayâ€™s fastest growing telecom company? Skype is barely over 500 mil while India mobile is soon expected to have 1.2 billion subscribers). Alas, itâ€™s time now to go make some more fuel for my engine.
Update: My comment has not yet been approved, so I’m glad I made a copy here just in case. I also have to point out there is some sweet irony; a post about efficiency and automation is taking a long time to approve a comment. Maybe it’s a manual process. :)