Show me a Focus on Hybrid-Diesel

Who can forget when Bill Ford explained during the great restructuring last year that his company had traditionally sold low quality cars to Americans but high quality to Europeans. He said they thought there was no market for quality cars in America until after the crisis they noticed foreign brands outselling theirs.

The European Focus will be their first step to change this, introducing a quality compact car as detailed by Wired in their “Big Bet on Small Cars” article. Naturally, I expect they will not introduce the diesel Focus in America. Why do they bet on small cars instead of efficient cars?

Mercedes has been working on the holy grail of cool engine efficiency technology: aerodynamic diesel-hybrids built out of Advanced High-Strength Steels (AHSS). The new E300 mercedes gets 52mpg (4.5 l/100km). Once again, only available outside America.

There seems to be a leadership gap in the US as conservative market followers dominate the auto industry…so sad that the executive that brought the Prius to America died. He might have been in a position to really speed up innovation and competition. It was a leading design when it was introduced, primarily as it proved there was pent-up market demand, but the Prius is too weak and compact to make sense in the American market of road-trips and hauling cargo.

Ford should take the 500/Taurus and make a high-performance diesel option to compete with the Audi and Mercedes variants. It also should bring the EuroFocus diesel and go hybrid with it by 2012.

BlueTOAD (Bluetooth Travel Time Origin and Destination)

BlueTooth devices have been proliferating to the point where you can make a safe bet that most vehicles have one. That’s why some clever folks are starting to monitor the highways for bluetooth in project BlueTOAD.

Rather than depend on every car carrying a toll tag in plain view, the sensors along highways can read the unique address of a BlueTooth device and then predict traffic flow times. The collection of BlueTooth information then also can be tapped by law enforcement, or at least requested by a court, to prove movement of the devices. I vaguely remember a divorce case where a husband was proved to be cheating on his wife because of his toll tag movements.

The identity of a BlueTooth device, it’s MAC address, is in no way permanently connected to an individual. This makes BlueTooth potentially less sensitive than license plates and toll tags. Likewise, a bluetooth device could in theory cycle its address or duplicate others to make tracking difficult. There are plenty of lessons from the P2P market in how to keep service alive while modifying the MAC. A big difference from P2P, however, is that the portable BlueTooth device market is highly proprietary and unfriendly to user configuration (ever try to setup a BlueTooth PIN other than 0000?)

I leave all my BlueTooth disabled these days; not because I am very worried about being tracked or even because of eavesdropping, but because battery life is so poor. I find it much less hassle and more efficient to use the cord. The extra security and privacy is a secondary benefit.

Frankly I’m more concerned about the MyLocation project and the privacy settings for APIs to Google maps. In a test to compare with BlueTOAD we’ve been able to use a simple query to the Google map traffic data API to monitor the movement of a person’s phone.

I’m not sure Google meant it to be setup this way; it’s a security flaw from a privacy perspective but then again I know departments of transportation and law enforcement investigators already interested in accessing the data.