Category Archives: Security

1942: British Get a Good Laugh From Rommel’s Crude Propaganda Attempts

PsyWar hosts a photo gallery with some interesting history, such as this one from WWII:

Indian troops in the Egyptian desert get a laugh from one of the leaflets which Field Marshal Erwin Rommel has taken to dropping behind the British lines now that his ground attacks have failed. The leaflet, which of course are strongly anti-British in tone, are printed in Hindustani, but are too crude to be effective. (Photo was flashed to New York from Cairo by radio. Credit: ACME Radio Photo)

The Australian War Memorial gives a sample of the crude work. Here’s a leaflet dropped by Nazis on 22nd August 1942 at El Alamein meant to unsettle Australia’s 9th Division.

The platapus boomerang is a dubious choice for leaflets meant to hurt morale as it simply reinforced the official blazon of the 9th as you can see here plainly:

Australian 9th Division Cavalry Regiment. British Vickers Tank, Light, Mk VIB

Update September 2021: Armchair Historian gives us his perspective on India in WWII

See also, headlines from Operation Bertram and Operation Torch reporting how easily and badly Rommel was routed by the British:

Rommel was impatient, hot-headed and disagreeable. His work often was beset by predictability, simple planning failures (e.g. communications and supply) and lack of accountability.

His troops ultimately were crushed by Allied forces in Summer of 1942 and, perhaps most notably, he abandoned them by 1943. A good thing too, given his personal role in spread of horrors from an unthinking devotion to fascism:

…empowered to “take executive measures against the civilian population”, Nazi jargon for robbery, murder and enslavement.

Here’s a perfect example:

“The Germans expected to seize Lyon quite easily,” Fargettas recounted. “But on the morning of June 19, they faced very strong resistance, in battles lasting for several hours. After the Wehrmacht won the first battles in the afternoon, they executed French as well as African prisoners. But on the next day – after the last pockets of resistance were defeated – they divided the prisoners into two: The French on one side, the Africans on the other. They led the latter down an isolated road. They were sent to a field and machine-gunned.” During these massacres, some French soldiers were also executed or wounded for trying to intervene.

Mass executions of POW and obvious violations of war conventions in the Chasselay Massacre was not the exception. Rommel was directly involved in an illegal execution of a French Colonel in 1940.

Hiding such obvious failures of leadership while cooking up a “famous reputation” for the Nazi General was propaganda by its military intelligence. In other words there was a concerted effort by Rommel and his peers to conceal their ongoing atrocities from the Allies. Such propaganda was spread around Europe in an attempt to hide reality and “morale boost” its troops facing an unavoidable defeat.

I mean by 1942 it was very clear that Germany had no chance to win — it became a question only of how long the Germans would continue to make terrible life choices.

Source: “Images of War: The Armour of Rommel’s Afrika Korps” by Ian Baxter. Rommel’s men show utter disgust with him as their leader, while the “unbeatable and unbearable” General Montgomery outsmarts them at El Alamein.

An interesting footnote on how Rommel was routed so quickly by Montgomery is that the former tried to blame his failures on obedience to Hitler or at least interference, while the latter made no excuses when he refused to listen to Churchill.

A couple years after Rommel’s disasters in North Africa and Europe he followed stupid orders to kill himself, citing to his family a fear of living in a world without Nazism (and also Hitler threatened to shoot dead Rommel’s entire family unless he committed suicide immediately).

Such fealty was spun as propaganda into bogus claims that the retreating General who swallowed poison was in fact loved by Nazis.

Even more laughable was their propaganda that he died from battle wounds, a sad twist since he had walked away from battle and then Hitler killed him with a pill.

Curiously, American soldiers to this day sometimes buy into widespread propaganda and lies about the Nazi Rommel, very similar to American pathetic attempts to believe in the failure and fraud Confederate General Lee.

Even more to the point, and another interesting footnote in history, Winston Churchill in 1941 had told the Allies to name tanks with real words instead of “gibberish” designations. The M3 “General Lee” was named for one of the worst military leaders in history, assigned to the American variant, while the British chose M3 “General Grant” for their own model. The Grant was shipped from America to face Rommel and became a prominent factor in General Montgomery’s crushing defeat in the first battle of El Alamein.

British Prime Minister Churchill then pressured the U.S. to call their next tank the M4… Sherman.

Fast forward to today and here’s the view from a U.S. M2 Bradley during the Iraq War, where a Nazi portrait has been attached inside the “fighting vehicle” in a completely tone-deaf fashion.

Source: Iraq War Footage

Surprised there isn’t a picture of General Lee next to it.

Anyone stepping into that vehicle should sadly “get a laugh” at the bad propaganda, just like 1942 Indian or Australian troops in the Egyptian desert.

Inarticulate Grief

Spoiler alert. Inarticulate Grief is a poem by Richard Aldington about WWI that is still relevant today.

Let the sea beat its thin torn hands
In anguish against the shore,
Let it moan
Between headland and cliff;
Let the sea shriek out its agony
Across waste sands and marshes,
And clutch great ships,
Tearing them plate from steel plate
In reckless anger;
Let it break the white bulwarks
Of harbour and city;
Let it sob and scream and laugh
In a sharp fury,
With white salt tears
Wet on its writhen face;
Ah! let the sea still be mad
And crash in madness among the shaking rocks —
For the sea is the cry of our sorrow

Now read Inarticulate Grief, by Sean Patrick Hughes, a beautiful prose about America’s endless Bush-Cheney Wars.

No deployment I had was hard enough to make me deal with the pain it caused. Someone always had it harder. No loss suffered; no trauma absorbed was bad enough to acknowledge. Someone always had it tougher. Acknowledging it, in some way, dishonored them.

That a16z Defensive Moat Around Your Jail Cell Doesn’t Make It Any Less of a Jail Cell

Please demote anyone today who tries to claim that installation of a “defensive moat” is a way for monarchs to prevent people from escaping taxation.

The Benin Wall and its moat (Nigeria) built by Oba Oguola 1280-1295 were allegedly four times longer than the “Great Wall” of China. Source: hotels.ng

In a bizarre screed about their view of technology futures, a16z literally advocates for the least ethical data practices as their “best” strategy to profit with AI. They refer to your data being difficult to remove from a castle as a “defensive moat”, which doesn’t make it any easier to justify as unlawful incarceration:

Great software companies are built around strong defensive moats. Some of the best moats are strong forces like network effects, high switching costs, and economies of scale.

That investment moat definition is basically a way of rationalizing insiders being prevented from leaving, historically the opposite of what “best moats” were actually engineered to do (protect against outsiders harming the residents sheltering inside).

Lock all your users’s data up and throw away the key seems to be the thinking behind this “best moat” definition for AI, although I’m sure people will argue locking up everyone inside a moat so they can’t leave when they want is somehow a rational defensive mindset for AI castle leadership.

Abolition of the unjust moats sounds like a good response to investor posts calling for forced incarceration of your body of data for their AI machine profits. Crossing a moat to leave should be your right, not denied by a castle that wants your body of data to pay for their moats and jails.

Choose liberty for your data, and walk away from for-profit prisons by giant “defensive moat” development barons.

Brake Indicators Are Public, Therefore Braking Data Isn’t Protected

The IAPP has a good article on privacy considerations for things in cars and the data streams associated with them. Here’s a notable section:

On appeal, the California Appellate Court agreed, noting that “a person has no reasonable expectation of privacy in speed on a public highway” because speed is easily observable by the public, through radar detectors or estimation by a trained police expert. Thus, Diaz had no Fourth Amendment expectation of privacy; “technology merely captured information defendant knowingly exposed to the public.”

That doesn’t fairly reflect the actual court documents, which speak directly to the brake indicators being designed for public view.

…a person has no reasonable expectation of privacy in speed on a public highway because speed may readily be observed and measured through, for example, radar devices (e.g., People v. Singh (2001) 92 Cal.App.4th Supp. 13, 15 [112 Cal.Rptr.2d 74]), pacing the vehicle (e.g., People v. Lowe (2002) 105 Cal.App.4th Supp. 1, 5 [130 Cal.Rptr.2d 249]), or estimation by a trained expert (e.g., People v. Zunis (2005) 134 Cal.App.4th Supp. 1, 6 [36 Cal.Rptr.3d 489]). Similarly, a person has no reasonable expectation of privacy in use of a vehicle’s brakes because statutorily required brake lights (Veh. Code, § 24603) announce that use to the public.

The article makes many good points about secrecy of the logs collected, as well as manufacturer defects in devices that challenge the integrity of any observation (e.g. broken brake light). Above all, it’s interesting to see how courts ruled on something designed to publicly disclose, when the user claims its use was a protected secret.