Category Archives: Energy

Tesla Cybertruck Static Electricity Risk Analysis: Las Vegas Trump Hotel Winter Morning Explosion


If you or someone you know is struggling with thoughts of suicide, trained counselors are available 24/7 at 988, the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline. Military service members and veterans have a Veterans Crisis Line by calling 988 then pressing 1, or texting 838255.

Executive Summary: The Tesla Cybertruck has been plagued with six recalls in just its first year due to design defects. Another one just may have been accidentally revealed in a massive explosion from fuel stored in the truck bed with cover closed. Unpainted flat steel body panels at sharp angles, combined with the dry and cold winter air, and the unsafe storage of metal fuel cans allowing vapor collection around fireworks, may have generated the kind of high charge static electricity tinder that made a sudden combustion inevitable.

High Risk Factors

This Cybertruck combination presents a highly elevated static electricity risk:

  • Low humidity (20% typical desert morning)
  • Cold temperatures (-5°C)
  • Large metallic surface area with sharp angles causing charge concentration points
  • Known defects in Cybertruck electrical grounding
  • High-speed long distance travel

Environmental Conditions

  • Air Temperature: -5°C (cold morning)
  • Relative Humidity: 20% (typical desert morning)
  • Vehicle Speed: 75 mph (33.528 m/s)
  • Distance: 1,300,000 m (Colorado Springs to Las Vegas)
  • Cross-sectional Area: 5.7 m²
  • Air Breakdown Field Strength: 3 × 10⁶ V/m (at sea level)

Material Properties

  • Steel Permittivity: 8.85 × 10⁻¹² F/m
  • Air Permittivity: 8.86 × 10⁻¹² F/m
  • Steel Resistivity: 6.9 × 10⁻⁷ Ω⋅m

Results

Charge Accumulation Rate: 1.20e-1 C/s
Maximum Realistic Voltage: 3.00e+4 V
Discharge Probability: 80.0%
Charge Ratio (Cybertruck/Normal Truck): 1.67x

Risk Assessment

  • The Cybertruck’s angular metallic design creates 1.67x more charge accumulation than standard trucks
  • Cold desert morning conditions (-5°C, 20% humidity) significantly increase static risk
  • Voltage buildup is limited by air breakdown at 3.0 MV/m
  • Discharge probability is 80.0% under these conditions

Circumstances

  • It’s illegal to transport fireworks and gas cans together in a truck bed (or trunk, or inside a car). The victim was active duty military with knowledge in flammable/explosive material handling such as fuel cans so this doesn’t seem accidental.
  • The truck bed cover being closed means vapor likely accumulated for a while on a long drive, creating a dangerously combustible moment, also probably not accidental.
  • The Cybertruck has known electrical design flaws related to improper grounding and potential fire hazards, such as potential arcs when being shifted into park or during mechanical transitions. It is unlikely this was factored by the victim.
  • Metal fuel cans in a metal truck have been a known danger of sudden vapor combustion for many years, quickly destroying cars, begging the question whether Tesla ignored known safety practices.

    …the Petroleum Equipment Institute, a trade group, found that there were at least 170 static electricity fires at gas stations from 1992 to 2006. …the problem probably isn’t a big one. Unless, of course, it’s your car that has burst into flames. Since Mrs. Shager’s pickup was destroyed in November, at least two other serious fires at gas stations have been attributed to static electricity, including one that severely burned a woman.

Some of this math may help explain the mystery surrounding 17 long seconds after the Cybertruck robotically parked itself neatly and quietly in front of the Trump Hotel (instead of crashing into the lobby) and began to emit smoke from the bed.

…military ID, passport and credit cards were found in the vehicle, along with several firearms, and that the driver had shot himself in the head before the vehicle detonated. “I’m comfortable calling it a suicide,” [Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department Sheriff] McMahill said at the briefing. […] …gasoline canisters, camp fuel canisters and large firework mortars were found in the back of the vehicle after the explosion, which occurred about 15 seconds after the vehicle pulled in front of the building. It’s still unclear how the explosives were ignited, McMahill said.

If suicide of a US Army soldier with explosives expertise — self-immolation as protest — is officially suspected then a lot of the analysis shifts.

It’s possible firing a gun intentionally ignited the bed full of explosive fuel vapor. Or it’s possible the Cybertruck itself sparked in an electrical or mechanical event causing an ignition, after his suicide and unintentionally. There are many possibilities still, as details are being released, but static electricity risk might be considered another design defect of the Cybertruck worth investigating.

Iran Plunged Into Energy Crisis Due to Funds Redirected to Assad

The lights and heat are being turned down in Iran after they realize investing in Assad has left them vulnerable and unprepared for winter.

Despite boasting massive gas reserves, Iran is facing power blackouts and industrial shutdowns. Years of mismanagement and false priorities threaten to turn the country into an energy importer. […]
Karimi said Iran has spent billions of dollars over decades to prop up the Assad regime, including by supplying it with millions of barrels of crude for free. “Iran has reportedly spent over $25 billion on Syria, primarily through oil support,” she added. “This pattern of prioritizing regional alliances over infrastructure investment has left Iran’s energy sector in dire need of modernization.”

From Gold to Grid: Russia’s Foreign Infrastructure Control Playbook

Russia’s lone veto of a Sudan ceasefire (1-14 UN vote) last week follows a pattern of infrastructure manipulation — one that provides a warning about cryptocurrency’s growing control over American power grids. In Sudan, Russia profits from gold market chaos while blocking peace. In America, crypto operations fight oversight while gaining unprecedented control of power infrastructure. The parallel is clear: using critical infrastructure for political leverage while building shadow financial networks.

From Gold to Grid

Russia’s strategy in Sudan is brutally effective: maintain political chaos to control resource extraction while cynically preaching “sovereignty.” By arming both the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) and Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) in their civil war, Russia secures gold extraction and port access while creating untraceable channels for moving money outside Western oversight. Over 10 million displaced civilians, and research from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine estimating more than 26,000 violent deaths in Khartoum alone between April 2023 and June 2024, show the spiraling human cost of this cruel profit scheme.

Now cryptocurrency’s evolution in America follows the same deadly playbook of undermining safety for profit:

Phase 1: Infrastructure Control

Phase 2: Shadow Financial Networks

Phase 3: Political Capture

  • Moving from obstruction to active elimination of oversight
  • Using infrastructure control as political leverage
  • Funding campaigns to dismantle regulatory frameworks

Putin’s Playbook in Action

In Sudan, Russia’s approach exposes their strategy: claim to fight “colonialism” while actually colonizing through chaos. They maintain puppet influence while stirring violence, creating opportunities to undermine local authority through:

  • Resource extraction (gold mines, ports)
  • Secret trade networks (sanctions evasion)
  • Diplomatic leverage (UN veto power)
  • Infrastructure control (both military and economic)

The cryptocurrency industry follows this same pattern domestically. While claiming to fight for “financial freedom,” they’re actually building concentrated control over critical infrastructure. In Texas alone, their 41 GW of mining requests represents unprecedented leverage over the power grid – especially concerning given crypto industry’s millions in political donations to state officials overseeing grid policy.

National Security Implications

Energy Secretary Granholm has expressed that projected 15% increases in electricity demand by 2050 “literally” keep her up at night. But the immediate threat isn’t just about capacity — it’s about control and who profits from chaos.

The industry’s progression from resisting oversight to actively funding its elimination mirrors Russia’s approach: create crisis, build parallel financial networks, and convert infrastructure control into political power.

Infrastructure as Political Weapon

Like Russia’s exploitation of Sudan’s gold, cryptocurrency operations are transforming American infrastructure into a political weapon. Their concentrated control in vulnerable grid areas combined with active resistance to transparency creates both direct infrastructure leverage and political influence. The goal isn’t profit — it’s power.

The EIA’s estimate of 0.6-2.3% of U.S. electricity consumption deliberately understates their true leverage, given their strategic positioning and successful obstruction of data collection. Like Russia hiding gold trades, crypto hides its true footprint.

Warning Signals

When Russia vetoes peace in Sudan while profiting directly from gun violence and limited government, they expose how infrastructure capture really works. Create chaos, promise freedom, seize control. The cryptocurrency industry uses identical tactics especially in Texas: fight “government overreach” while building unprecedented private control over American infrastructure.

The stakes couldn’t be higher. Just as Russia’s “anti-colonial” rhetoric in Sudan masks deadly exploitation, cryptocurrency’s “financial freedom” claims hide a systematic effort for unaccountable elites to seize America’s critical infrastructure. Sudan today shows us America’s tomorrow if we continue allowing private interests following an authoritarian playbook to drive the political narratives.


Sources:
EIA Today in Energy
Utility Dive Report
Reuters on Russia’s Restrictions
The Heatmap

Tesla Deaths Rise in Stark Contrast to “vehicles with lowest driver death rates”

First, you have to wonder just how many more people must die (as dutifully reported by TeslaDeaths.com) before Tesla is properly banned from public roads?

Tesla Deaths Per Year

Source: TeslaDeaths.com

Remember, the Ford Pinto had killed around 25 people (as told by Ford) when the entire country had to shift into gear in order to regulate against safety design negligence by car makers.

Front doors jam shut preventing escape or rescue from a burning car? That sounds just like a Tesla! Except Tesla is on track to kill 25 people per month! How are they legal?

I mean do we expect a market to somehow adjust itself today such that people stop owning Tesla, as well as stop riding in and around them? I have doubts about such consumer self-correction as I still weekly read news from grieving families who say, too late, they never understood the very fast growing risk of their loved ones being burned alive, hit head-on or run over by Tesla.

And on this tragic note about the exploding number of deaths in defective cars, which seem to only be stopped with regulation, Tesla has many shockingly old safety design defects. Consider for comparison an assorted list of high safety models, from far better engineered brands.

  • Acura MDX four-wheel-drive
  • Audi Q5 four-wheel-drive
  • Chevrolet Traverse four-wheel-drive
  • Lexus RX 350 four-wheel-drive
  • Mercedes-Benz E-Class sedan four-wheel-drive
  • Porsche Macan
  • Subaru Ascent
  • Toyota C-HR
  • Volvo XC60 four-wheel-drive

There are even more options than these, because it’s apparently easy to post better safety results than the high-priced low-quality “luxury” Tesla. This reference is only to show many cars achieve extremely low death rates in the latest real world results (NHTSA Fatality Analysis Reporting System). In other words, no Tesla achieves what others can.

Source: IIHS

The IIHS emphasizes another angle on the data as well. They say marketing of the technology has as much to do with high death tolls as the designs themselves, or perhaps even more impact.

The explanation may lie in the image of the vehicles. Luxury cars are associated with ease and comfort. In contrast, the [most deaths] on this list are associated with [dangerous behavior suggestions that] influence how they’re driven. […] Marketing for the Dodge Charger HEMI, for example, focuses on its “ground-shaking” power, its acceleration “bolting off the line” and its “racing-inspired” high-performance brakes, while the Chevrolet Camaro promises buyers the ability to “dominate on the daily” with an “extreme track performance package” and the Ford Mustang offers “adrenaline chasers” the power to “keep ahead of the pack.”

Tesla’s infamously thoughtless “appetite for destruction” strangely isn’t mentioned in this paragraph, even though the brand is regularly posting dangerous behavior suggestions… such as their CEO boasting to customers that “accidents probably won’t happen” when they drive drunk or fall asleep at the wheel.

The latest NHTSA formal defect investigation letter to Tesla that the company must stop false advertising of “driverless” capabilities seems to fit. Tesla might be the most causal relationship of all, given repeated fraudulent safety statements leading directly to high death rates. I’d still argue Tesla engineering defects are a significant factor, however. No other brand has been reporting multiple cases of everyone inside being burned to death (again and again), for one obvious example, given the notorious “death trap” design defect that seals Tesla doors shut after a crash.

Are you driving the deadliest car in the world?

To put it another way, in 1971 a new agency (NHTSA) was pushing the first major safety regulations, against the desires of a hugely popular racist president Nixon. The “pro business” President expressed a list of clear disdains:

  1. Environmental protection (“fighting a delaying action”)
  2. Consumer advocacy (“Naderism”)
  3. Safety regulations (“greatly exaggerated”)
  4. “Environmentalists and consumerism people” who he claimed were “enemies of the system”

Most tellingly, Nixon dehumanized people if they were concerned with the environment, literally calling them animals and a threat:

…we can’t have a completely safe society or safe highways or safe cars and pollution-free and so forth. Or we could have, go back and live like a bunch of damned animals. […] They’re not one damn bit interested in safety or clean air. What they’re interested in is destroying the system.

He went even further to turn his comments racist and target Native Americans, as if to build a “white man” argument against environmental progress:

You see, what it is, too, is that we are, we are now becoming obsessed with the idea that … progress … industrialization, ipso facto, is bad. The great life is to have it like when the Indians were here. You know how the Indians lived? Dirty, filthy, horrible.

And so does anyone really think that the Tesla and Trump Whitehouse will reveal anything different than Ford and Nixon did with the Pinto? Hint: Ralph Nader refers to Tesla as manslaughter.

Transcripts reveal for historians how Nixon fundamentally sided with industry over public safety and environmental concerns, viewing regulation as an attack on business rather than an innovation engine for protection of people. He acted to delay critical safety requirements (like airbags) after meeting with car executives, proving himself to be a corrupt (ultimately criminal) President who dangerously prioritized big corporate short-term interests over sustainable investments and public safety.

Related: Tesla topped iSeeCars list of most dangerous car brands with an almost unbelievable crash frequency that has climbed to 5X the number of Tesla being produced.

Key Observations: Data clearly shows that both serious incidents (orange line) and fatal incidents (pink line) are increasing at a steeper rate than the fleet size growth (blue line). This is particularly evident from 2021 onwards, where: Fleet size (blue) shows a linear growth of about 1x per year. Serious incidents (orange) show an exponential growth curve, reaching nearly 5x by 2024. Fatal incidents (pink) also show a steeper-than-linear growth, though not as dramatic as serious incidents. The divergence between the blue line (fleet growth) and the incident lines (orange and pink) indicates that incidents are indeed accelerating faster than the production/deployment of new vehicles.