$180K Grant in 1966: Automated License Plate Readers (ALPR) for New York Surveillance

They wait for hours until late in the evening on the Brooklyn Bridge. (Photo by Anthony Calvacca/New York Post/Photo Archives, LLC)

During research for my new book I often run into artificial intelligence promises of the 1950s that by the 1960s meant tests of the sort of thing people today talk about as new technology.

For example I’ve given several presentations on how driverless cars were promised to be on roads by the mid-1970s, and why such automation dreams for our civilian lives instead fizzled and failed (i.e. fears stemming from the Cuban Missile Crisis).

Another example of this nature is the optical character recognition (OCR) work that by 1966 was considered good enough to read license plates. For some reason I often find people claiming that this was a development in the 1980s, specifically Automated License Plate Readers (ALPR).

Archives easily confirm the 1980s are decades late. I’ve even found some evidence of late 1960s NYPD plans for racist profiling (“wanted car” surveillance) with bridges outfitted with ALPR. Such surveillance seems far more real and sinister than even the infamous New York “Jim Crow bridge story“.

Here’s a taste of what I’ve found in the U.S. Senate Committee on Appropriations record about innovations at that time:

Hearings, Reports and Prints of the Senate Committee on Appropriations, Volume 89, U.S. Government Printing Office, 1966, p 33

Perhaps New York should consider celebrating their surveillance state history by issuing a commemorative license plate for automated license plate readers? 2016 would have been the 50th anniversary of the kind of research grant that nobody seems to remember.

The $180K grant for New York in 1966 is the equivalent of a $1.4M grant today. It seems to be a significant amount for surveillance technology development and evaluation. Today is a different story, however.

ALPR cost has deflated over the same time, so now anyone can run free OpenALPR themselves on inexpensive hardware.

“Get an alert the moment any license plate is seen by your security cameras. Monitor suspicious activity with simple database searches that reveal the full history of any vehicle that drove past a camera on your property.”

The shift in surveillance market economics was highlighted a couple years ago by an Australian hobbyist with the click-bait headlines: “How I replicated an $86 million [Victoria police] project in 57 lines of code” and “I caught someone with it“.

BlueNet only has to meet a 95% accuracy target. So if $1 million gets you to 80% accuracy, and maybe $10 million gets you to 90% accuracy — when do you stop spending?

The answer appears to be in the question. Spending could stop when you hit that 95% accuracy target, assuming you don’t run into the privacy and ethical problems that have plagued ALPR for 50 years now, such as this extortion case in 1997

The D.C. police lieutenant in charge of investigating extortion plots was arrested yesterday and charged with carrying out his own extortion plot against men who frequented a gay bar…Stowe used a law enforcement computer system to identify the man and at least two others who visited the club through their automobile license plates.

…or this public shaming case in 2015

Los Angeles is considering sending “Dear John” letters to the homes of men who [drive through neighborhoods where prostitutes are alleged to be] hoping the mail will be opened by mothers, girlfriends or wives.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.