SF Tesla Kills Two in 100MPH Crash Like a Cruise Missile Into Stopped City Traffic

Update: The Tesla driver says he was pressing the brake but the car accelerated instead.

Zheng also told investigators he had been pressing the brakes but claims the vehicle failed to slow down or stop.


Reaching 100 mph on 6th Street is hard to do, but it shows the urban destructive potential of Tesla.

The crash happened around 6:10 pm Sunday, and a black Tesla appears to have approached a line of cars stopped in traffic at a high rate of speed, including a Waymo, colliding with one and causing a chain reaction.

As KRON4 reports, seven vehicles were involved and there were eight total victims reported, with one victim killed, and two transported to the hospital with life-threatening injuries.

A dog was also killed in one of the vehicles.

Two dead so far, including the dog. The Tesla operated more like a cruise missile targeting a dense civilian area than a car. This incident also bears striking similarities to national security threat patterns documented elsewhere.

Witnesses suggest it was another sudden unintended acceleration Tesla with defective brakes, like the infamous case in China.

Authorities are still working to see if the crashes are related, though a victim told KTVU the I-280 crashes and the 6th and Harrison Street crash involved the same black Tesla.

“We got hit from behind, which was really abrupt, obviously,” said the victim, Reese Wallace, whose Nissan Versa was among cars hit on the off-ramp.

Wallace said the Tesla continued on the left shoulder, hitting other cars, before running a red light at Brannan and continuing north on 6th Street to Harrison.

I’ve driven that stretch of road a million times at 6pm, exiting 280 onto 6th, and it’s a dense traffic area. There isn’t space to accelerate into without hitting cars let alone running red lights, which is why so many victims are mentioned.

China last year announced it was banning the Tesla design defects related to a predictably sharp rise in sudden acceleration crashes.

If you haven’t been living under a rock, you must be aware of the many Tesla crashes allegedly caused by a sudden unintended acceleration (SUA) issue. Tesla owners reported that the car suddenly accelerated, and no amount of pressure on the brake pedal could make the car stop. This developed into a full-blown hysteria in 2020-2022 when people in China started protesting over Tesla’s alleged “brake problems.”

Obviously a ban on design defects in China, due to outrage, unfortunately doesn’t mean America will see the benefits to safety. Tesla continues killing far more Americans than domestic terrorists at a faster pace, yet regulators seem unsure still about public sentiment to stop the tragedy.

The regulatory contrast between China and the US becomes even more stark when applying a national security lens to the data.

After all, Tesla vigorously denies that its cars are built in a quagmire of racism and mysogyny, and that it has intentionally been ignoring basic science in order to repeat one of the automotive industry’s most notorious safety scandals, effectively becoming the new Audi 5000. Their vicious “blood letting” legal defense strategy (using a constantly rotating general counsel) apparently is enough for them to get away with increasing manslaughter year after year.

This pattern reflects unmistakable cruelty in leadership behavior. Tesla CEO Elon Musk throws a Hitler salute at a political rally, markets Tesla with Heil Hitler (88) everywhere, brands his companies with swastikas, and runs high profile disinformation campaigns to normalize Nazism. He doesn’t just ask why everyone sees Nazis as bad, he calls himself a genius who can’t understand the value of (non-white) human life.

Tesla Deaths Per Year Show Urgent Need for Stronger US Safety Regulation

Bar graph showing rapidly increasing yearly Tesla-related deaths 2013-2024
Annual Tesla-related deaths recorded by TeslaDeaths.com through November 2024

Commentary on vehicle safety defects, especially when supported by public records and news reports of injuries and deaths, represents core protected speech about matters of urgent public concern. Tesla’s role in multiple crashes, their responses to safety investigations, and regulatory actions in different countries are all matters of significant public interest where robust debate serves an essential democratic function. Courts have repeatedly held that discussion of corporate responsibility for public safety – particularly regarding products used daily on public roads – deserves the strongest protection, even when that commentary draws pointed conclusions from available evidence. This kind of analysis helps inform both consumer choice and policy decisions that directly impact human life.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.