Security Buddha Seeks Balls

I ran into a blog called Security Buddha that you might say does not exactly fit the “Buddha” moniker. For example, the author rants about how much he dislikes the other people on the Security Bloggers Network. It reminds me of the old Groucho Marx line “I would not join any club that would have someone like me for a member.”

Maybe it should be called Security Adonoi?

Great comedic relief, but it is hardly the sort of thing I would expect from an enlightened one.

Here is perhaps the best and most telling part:

I am happy to debate you charlatans on a public stage at a conference of your choice about that topic if you have the balls

Why must someone have balls to debate this guy on stage? Is he afraid to lose to a woman in public?

Golf Cart Nation in Danger

About two years ago I wrote a long rant about the stupid policy by General Motors to license golf-carts for zero-emissions vehicle compliance. They even had the gall to try and lobby for speed/safety limits on the golf-carts, while claiming them to be part of the regular vehicle fleet. Either they are equivalent or they are not, right?

Anyway, the AP posted today some revealing safety numbers related to the rapidly expanding golf-cart nation:

The research found that over a four-year period, nearly 50,000 people were hurt in accidents involving golf carts.

One of the studies, by the University of Alabama at Birmingham, said about 1,000 Americans are hurt on golf carts every month. Males aged 10 to 19 and people over 80 had the highest injury rates.

No surprise there. I think those are the same high-risk groups as with (dare I say it) regular vehicles.

A separate study by the Center for Injury Research and Policy at Nationwide Children’s Hospital in Columbus, Ohio, said annual injury rates for golf carts increased 130 percent over 16 years ending in 2006. The report said falling or jumping out of carts accounted for the largest number of injuries, 38 percent.

“Part of it is there are more people using them. Part of it is they are using them in more places,” said Tracy J. Mehan of the injury research center, noting many carts can reach speeds of 25 mph.

25 mph! Who are they kidding? If you can not go faster than 25 mph, you should not qualify as a fleet vehicle. You certainly can not drive on the Eisenhower interstate system, and are probably a hazard on any road including deserted county roads. A bicycle can probably average a higher overall speed than a golf-cart and a horse most certainly can, especially in rough terrain where falling and jumping are most likely. My point is that speed is not new, nor is it the only factor in safety issues:

“A lot of people perceive golf carts as little more than toys, but our findings suggest they can be quite dangerous, especially when used on public roads,” he said in a statement.

McGwin recommends driver education and safety standards for golf carts, which are largely unregulated. He also called for the use of helmets and seat belts and better golf course design to reduce steep hills, sharp curves and other hazards.

Exactly. GM and the American President did a fine job betting their farms on a vehicle that represents little more than a giant loophole in good sense. Now regulation will have to step in and beat some sense into the American companies that make these things. In the meantime, car manufacturers overseas (who did not attempt to pretend a golf cart would be a suitable vehicle) threaten to steam past GM with full-size vehicles that can meet future safety and emission requirements.

Questions about Gulf sailboat race death

The Star Tribune brings to light some interesting facts surrounding the death of a sailboat racer:

Development tycoon George Mitchell donated the Cynthia Woods and an identical boat to Texas A&M University in 2006, the Galveston County Daily News and Houston Chronicle reported Thursday.

The university has taken the other boat, the George Phydias, out of commission until officials can determine whether a design defect caused the keel failure.

The company that built the boats, North Carolina-based Cape Fear Yacht Works, said in a statement Wednesday it stands by its products. The company is owned by George Mitchell’s son, Keith.

“We believe in the design, construction and safety of our vessels,” the company said.

It also said it was not responsible for maintenance or repair work after the vessel left the factory. ha

The “ha” at the end is in the original article. Strange, no? But more to the point, the fact that the father was buying boats from his son’s boat manufacturing company and donating them to a University raises some interesting questions. Those questions are compounded by suspected safety defects in construction.

All boat owners realize sooner or later that boats, like any vehicle, require regular maintenance and care to maintain safety. It is the father-son relationship of the donation and “tycoon” status of the donor, as well as the time-line, that make this story seem like more than just a simple tragedy.

A recent edition of Sailing Magazine mentions that the tycoon’s son was entirely new to the boat-building business:

The Cape Fear 38 is built in Wilmington, North Carolina, not far from its infamous namesake. Kent Mitchell, owner of Cape Fear Yacht Works, spent years racing and cruising the Carolina sounds and coasts before deciding to build his own version of the perfect racer-cruiser. While many of us fantasize about building boats, Mitchell jumped into the business with both feet. And he is enthusiastic about his product. “If racing is in your blood but you also want some creature comforts, then this is a boat you need to consider,” he said as we test-sailed hull No. 1 on a crisp Chesapeake Bay afternoon.

Hull number one? Jumped into the business? The father of the builder purchased and then donated not one but two $300K 38 foot boats when they were only two years old? I also noted that the base price went from $199K to $295K in just two years. Maybe the cost rise suggests that early versions were under-built? Prone to failure?