Majority of children robbed at school

Interesting report. Do you think this means generation Z will be more or less adverse to security than generations Y and X?

Director Frances Crook said children were rarely consulted about “the impact of crime on their lives”.

“The surveys revealed that these crimes are often not reported as children think adults will not listen to them or the crime will be viewed as too small to bother with,” she added.

“Ironically, the very institutions where children should feel safest – their school environments set up and patrolled by adults – are where children are most commonly victimised.

I am not sure I would agree with the conclusion.

I certainly never thought of school as an environment where I should feel safest; the opposite actually. I felt safest at home, where I was not forced to be in close proximity with strangers regulated only by even stranger rules and weak control systems that everyone seemed to know how to circumvent.

Something tells me that the “findings” are heavily weighted by an adult agenda to impose stricter controls under the guise of a “silent request” for safety. Strangely, the report does not discuss any trend over the period surveyed.

Every year, between 1997 and 2006, the survey asked children about their experiences of crime in the previous twelve months.

I mean there should be some data on whether there was an increase or decrease in the rate of criminal activity in the schools, no? 1997 to 2006 seems like an awfully short period as well. Why not survey adults about their experiences as a child — experiences of crime in the previous twenty/thirty years? Perhaps that would eliminate the error from lack/fear of reporting?

I suspect the bully effect is as old as the concept of the playground itself, so the question really should not be whether there are bullies or not but what are the appropriate (most successful?) controls among children as well as between them and adults. Perhaps there are simple ways to resolve some of the problems that do not require greater adult intervention and/or surveillance?

Stop all the clocks

by W.H. Auden

Stop all the clocks, cut off the telephone,
Prevent the dog from barking with a juicy bone,
Silence the pianos and with muffled drum
Bring out the coffin, let the mourners come.

Let aeroplanes circle moaning overhead
Scribbling on the sky the message He Is Dead,
Put crepe bows round the white necks of the public doves,
Let the traffic policemen wear black cotton gloves.

He was my North, my South, my East and West,
My working week and my Sunday rest,
My noon, my midnight, my talk, my song;
I thought that love would last for ever: I was wrong.

The stars are not wanted now: put out every one;
Pack up the moon and dismantle the sun;
Pour away the ocean and sweep up the wood.
For nothing now can ever come to any good.

I keep thinking about the ongoing noise of industrialism, the blaring pipes and mufflers of the brand-conscious consumerists, and wondering why silence is associated with mourning. At what point does the battle to outdo each other in noise become so overwhelming that it takes on the persona of despair and silence becomes the song of joyfulness? On the other hand, silence is given out of respect, so is noise a means of taunting and disrespect?

One thing is still for certain, while silence is power and comes from control, noise comes from a lack of control.

BART started work on its tracks between El Cerrito and Richmond earlier this week in an effort to quiet a high-pitched squeal grinding on residents’ nerves, according to a spokesman for the transit agency.

A machine that fixes noisy tracks at a rate of one-tenth of a mile each day is scheduled to work the line from Albany to Richmond, spokesman Linton Johnson said.

The work started after complaints mounted the past year, he said. The machine smoothes tiny ripples that form on the track over time, causing the noise when trains roll by.

Smell is another matter entirely, although Benjamin Franklin apparently did his part to discuss the two and recommend solutions. But seriously, on a related note (pun not intended), I found an interesting study in Biology Letters about crickets who silenced themselves to survive:

On the Hawaiian Island of Kauai, more than 90% of male field crickets (Teleogryllus oceanicus) shifted in less than 20 generations from a normal-wing morphology to a mutated wing that renders males unable to call (flatwing). Flatwing morphology protects male crickets from the parasitoid, which uses song to find hosts, but poses obstacles for mate attraction, since females also use the males’ song to locate mates. Field experiments support the hypothesis that flatwings overcome the difficulty of attracting females without song by acting as ‘satellites’ to the few remaining callers, showing enhanced phonotaxis to the calling song that increases female encounter rate. Thus, variation in behaviour facilitated establishment of an otherwise maladaptive morphological mutation.

Would humans have to adapt their mating behavior to compensate for a more quiet life? Imagine a night out that shuns loudness, but instead emphasizes silence, or even the delicacy of sound. Could muscle-car drivers, truckers and bikers survive without loud pipes? Will quality of sound ever supplant quantity at parties? No mourning, just joy at the beauty of quiet time. I predict that in the next ten years, quiet will become increasingly valued.

The Markets React to America’s Declining Security

The safety of Americans has lessened dramatically since Bush took office. This is perhaps reflected most clearly in the numbers of investors dropping the dollar from their portfolio. There is a lot of irony in the fact that the oil barons who are close friends of the President are the ones looking to reduce their risk of association:

Qatari Prime Minister, Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim bin Jabr al-Thani said on US TV that the government-backed $50bn Qatari Investment Authority (QIA) now had less than 40 per cent of its investments in dollars, down from a high two years ago of 99 per cent.

The fast-growth emerging markets are also stepping back. That’s a stunning decline. One question worth considering is whether this is good for big business partners in America, the ones who back the Republican campaigners, as they have diverse overseas investments to reduce their own risk. And if so, does the increased risk position these big corporatists into an even more powerful buy strategy while the domestic/smaller populist companies are left vulnerable.

Gravestone Scanning

Here is a fun use of pattern matching technology:

Illegible words on church headstones could be read once more thanks to a scan technology developed in the US.

[…]

A computer matches the patterns to a database of signature carvings which reveals the words.

What they don’t realize is that this could be used to scan people’s homes for tombstones turned into fireplaces and floors. It always annoyed me to find gravestones stolen from cemetaries around the midwest.

The article makes some other suggestions:

The researchers believe the technology will also have practical applications in other industry sectors, such as the security and medical fields.

Dr Cai said: “We may use the technology for the future UAVs (Unmanned Aviation vehicles) to detect ground signatures of ancient ruins and help medical doctors to diagnose patients’ well-being through tongue inspection.”

The technology could also be used to predict a possible tsunami by examining the patterns on the surface of the world’s oceans.

Could be? Hard to see how static scans of tombstone carvings could evolve to global wave monitoring, but I guess that is the exciting aspect of detection engines.