Rotten Chicken Sold to Black Neighborhoods

A row has started in South Africa over chicken targeted for sale in black neighborhoods. The BBC reports poultry makers now stand accused of being ‘racist’

Blade Nzimande said that the poultry industry was selling “rotten” meat to black people.

He said chicken past its best-before date was being recycled – thawed, washed and injected with flavouring – then sold to shops in black townships.

A spokesman for the poultry industry admitted the practice takes place, but said it was both safe and legal.

Is it fowl play to serve recycled chicken? In America it’s called Kentucky Fried Chicken. I’m kidding, of course…

Here is the real punch-line to this story. The South African poultry industry says not to worry because their internal safety practices are higher than baselines set by regulators. They themselves check the chickens before they try and squeeze a few more dollars out of those old smelly carcasses.

[A spokesman for the poultry industry said] the chickens were tested and certified by the producers before being sent out again and that these standards were actually higher than those required by the department of health.

But he also accepted that re-worked chicken did not go on sale in major supermarkets, which served the country’s wealthier suburbs.

Internally certified is like saying non-certified certification. I hear this kind of reasoning all the time in information security. Experts tell me their internal security practices are better than compliance. It’s a lot like contestants who get eliminated from American Idol and protest that the judges can’t tell real talent. So now I have to wonder if security professionals would take a different view on regulations if we’re talking about old chicken meat.

Which of them believes, in other words, they can trust the poultry industry standards more than the department of health? Does the department of health really allow chicken repackaging and resale, or is it a loophole? Maybe I should serve some chicken at the start of my next compliance presentation, tell this story, and see who keeps eating.

Sell-by and use-by dates are notoriously misleading and irregular in America. I often find people do not realize that they are not required by regulators for anything but food for babies. It clearly serves the industry to set expiration dates but not necessarily the consumer, as the above story illustrates.

The FDA page on Safe Eats – Meat, Poultry & Seafood, for example, does not mention anything about spoiled chicken indicators, but it has a section on fish.

“How can I tell if fish is fresh?”
Perfectly fresh fish and shellfish have virtually no odor. It’s only when seafood starts to spoil that it takes on a “fishy” aroma. Fresh fish will have these signs:

* The eyes are clean and bulge a little.
* Whole fish and fillets have firm and shiny flesh and bright, red gills free from slime.
* The flesh springs back when pressed.
* There is no darkening around the edges or brown or yellowish discoloration.
* The fish smells fresh and mild, not “fishy” or ammonia-like.

Note: Keep in mind that just because fish is fresh doesn’t mean it’s bacteria-free. You still need to follow the food safety tips above when handling or preparing fresh fish.

I confess I did not know about the bulging eyes. I thought all fish had bulging eyes. Maybe I have just been lucky and lived in the right neighborhoods? I would like to see that added to real-estate listings — quality schools near-by, fish with bulging eyes at the markets…

Back to the main point, expiration dates are not a regulation or law in America, as I have mentioned before here, here and here. America’s regulations are handled and explained by the USDA.

Is Dating Required by Federal Law? Except for infant formula and some baby food (see below), product dating is not generally required by Federal regulations. However, if a calendar date is used, it must express both the month and day of the month (and the year, in the case of shelf-stable and frozen products). If a calendar date is shown, immediately adjacent to the date must be a phrase explaining the meaning of that date such as “sell-by” or “use before.”

Dating by law? Even marriage is not required by federal law…but I digress. I have not yet found the exact food safety laws in South Africa. However, I can see that if this were a debate in America the poultry industry only would have to print the month with day of the month and a phrase like “use before we inject this with flavoring and sell in the other neighborhoods for less”. I’ll have to think some more about how that would be translated into cloud provider security. Maybe the question should be which security flavors are best for “aaS” injection.

In the meantime I have found an image to easily identify when chicken has gone bad:

A few more of these stories and I’ll have to start a poultry of information security site.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.