Monthly Archives: November 2007

Security

Cops fight over speeding ticket technology accuracy

1 Comment

I have been thinking about this AP story more and more lately. If anyone else was fighting the accuracy of a speed-detection device this would be a non-story, but because it is a retired deputy who says he is trying to maintain his “faith” in the justice system…well, that’s just sad and amusing all at the same time:

A retired sheriff’s deputy nevertheless hopes to beat the long odds of the law by setting the performance of a police officer’s radar gun against the accuracy of the GPS tracking device he installed in his teenage stepson’s car.

The retired deputy, Roger Rude, readily admits his 17-year-old stepson, Shaun Malone, enjoys putting the pedal to the metal. That’s why he and Shaun’s mother insisted on putting a global positioning system that monitors the location and speed of the boy’s Toyota Celica.

[…]

“I’m not trying to get a guilty kid off,” Rude said. “I’ve always had faith in our justice system. I would like to see the truth prevail and I would like Shaun to see that the system works.”

Truth prevail? Everyone knows the technology is wildly inaccurate and the courts go to some length to defend their weaknesses. The truth is that radar is inaccurate.

Our network intrusion detection sensors are also inaccurate, but at the end of the day the “smoke comes from fire” line of reasoning usually prevails and if there is enough circumstantial evidence and the accused are brought to trial then “justice” is often done in spite of the initial details rather than because of them.

What is your faith in radar speed detection, especially after you drive by one of the giant billboards that inaccurately display your speed? Those things seem like a subtle anti-radar advertising campaign.

Nonetheless, I hope the retired deputy is able to advance the courts’ understanding around technology used to monitor speed, as well as the integrity aspect of information security.

History, Security

Waterboarding is Torture. Period.

Leave a comment

According to an expert, Malcolm Nance:

Once at SERE and tasked to rewrite the Navy SERE program for the first time since the Vietnam War, we incorporated interrogation and torture techniques from the Middle East, Latin America and South Asia into the curriculum. In the process, I studied hundreds of classified written reports, dozens of personal memoirs of American captives from the French-Indian Wars and the American Revolution to the Argentinean ‘Dirty War’ and Bosnia. There were endless hours of videotaped debriefings from World War Two, Korea, Vietnam and Gulf War POWs and interrogators. I devoured the hundreds of pages of debriefs and video reports including those of then Commander John McCain, Colonel Nick Rowe, Lt. Dieter Dengler and Admiral James Stockdale, the former Senior Ranking Officer of the Hanoi Hilton. All of them had been tortured by the Vietnamese, Pathet Lao or Cambodians. The minutiae of North Vietnamese torture techniques was discussed with our staff advisor and former Hanoi Hilton POW Doug Hegdahl as well as discussions with Admiral Stockdale himself. The waterboard was clearly one of the tools dictators and totalitarian regimes preferred.

Why does Dick Cheney suggest that waterboarding is not torture?

Nance does not mix words on the subject:

There is No Debate Except for Torture Apologists

1. Waterboarding is a torture technique. Period. There is no way to gloss over it or sugarcoat it. It has no justification outside of its limited role as a training demonstrator. Our service members have to learn that the will to survive requires them accept and understand that they may be subjected to torture, but that America is better than its enemies and it is one’s duty to trust in your nation and God, endure the hardships and return home with honor.

End of discussion, or will Mukasey be confirmed?