Palin’s Church Says Jews Run the Economics of Nations

Kagro X posts on Daily Kos an excerpt of video from Sarah Palin’s church. Unlike the witch hunting in the other sermon, where a woman who lived near an intersection with accidents was accused of being a witch, this one accuses Jews of running the economy of America:

…starting at 1:20 in the video:

“The second area whereby God wants us, wants to penetrate in our society is in the economic area. The Bible says that the wealth of the wicked is stored up for the righteous. It’s high time that we have top Christian businessmen, businesswomen, bankers, you know, who are men and women of integrity running the economics of our nations. That’s what we are waiting for. That’s part and parcel of transformation. If you look at the — you know — if you look at the Israelites, that’s how they work. And that’s how they are, even today.”

Sarah Palin is present and on video for this one. She shows up at about 7:00 into it.

This preacher makes these remarks — “that’s how they are, even today” — and then Sarah Palin comes forward to stand before the congregation and receive his blessing.

Uh, Sarah?

It is likely that Palin has been raised and still surrounds herself with closed-minded people who espouse divisiveness and hatred towards others. Why else would she be standing in support only minutes after they preach such nonsense about “Israelites today”?

Have you ever heard Palin speak of tolerance and compassion towards others, in support of diversity? Her church seems to rail against science, fear non-Christians, and she is right there in lockstep when they pray for her.

Not the best speaker I have seen, and I sincerely hope Palin speaks to the press someday and lets us all know how much she disagrees with the teachings of her Church.

Pyrex Danger!

The update from Consumer Affairs is that Pyrex poses a deceptive safety risk to Americans and regulators are not doing anything about it:

It has been nearly three years since ConsumerAffairs.com first reported that consumers were being cut and burned by exploding Pyrex bakeware. The company was quick to deny the problem and government safety regulators seemed untroubled by the reports.

Three years later, not much has changed.

World Kitchen is the manufacturer of Pyrex and seems to think the problem is with the consumers.

On the front of a new Pyrex dish ConsumerAffairs.com purchased, the product’s label clearly states that it is “freezer safe … microwave safe … dishwasher safe … oven safe.”

But the fine print on the back tells a different tale:

“Avoid severe hot and cold temperature changes. … Use minimum amount of cooking time. … No stovetop, broiler, toaster oven, microwave, browner or any other direct heat source. … Do not add liquid to hot dish or place hot dish or glass cover in sink, immerse in water or place on cold or wet surfaces.”

How telling that they market the product up front for all the uses that the fine print on the back actually forbids. It is clearly unethical and deceptive to say something is safe for microwave and then warn people not to use the microwave, but here is something even worse:

“We cannot speculate on how someone was using their bakeware, and whether or not they were using it correctly,” wrote Bryan Glancy, World Kitchen spokesman. “Without examining the product, there is no confirmation that the product involved was Pyrex bakeware (as opposed to another manufacturer’s product). For this reason, unsubstantiated and unconfirmed reports of breakage should not be used as the basis for any conclusions to be drawn about Pyrex products.”

Why would people be complaining to Pyrex about other glass products that explode? How common is such confusion? I bet it never happens, but even if it happens once why try to use it as a primary reason to dismiss ALL consumer complaints? World Kitchen should setup a method to examine the product to confirm genuine Pyrex. Moreover, why speculate? Test bakeware using the claims from consumers and reveal the results to show safety. Perhaps even better is to use a 3rd party independent testing lab like Consumer Affairs.

The real issue here is that Corning licensed the Pyrex name in America to World Kitchen in 1998, and manufacturing quality/costs have declined. Corning licensed the Pyrex name to a different company in Europe, Arc International, and they have not had any of the same complaints or problems with exploding dishes.

Arc International’s Pyrex dishes cost about double what World Kitchen’s do in the U.S., but ConsumerAffairs.com has only one exploding Pyrex complaint from any country in the E.U.

ConsumerAffairs.com has complaints from every major English-speaking country where World Kitchen products are sold, including Canada, New Zealand and Australia.

Apparently Pyrex is now found in 80 percent of American homes, and yet the US Consumer Product Safety Commission refuses to respond to requests for information or complete an investigation of World Kitchen Pyrex.

The glass experts concluded that the only Pyrex dish any of them would use would be one purchased before 1998. Otherwise, they’re cooking with metal.

I just threw away all my American Pyrex brand dishes. European standards have proven themselves to be more oriented towards consumer safety, rather than profit for executives, so I now buy European certified products whenever possible. Either way you look at it the money for products now goes to foreign companies, but at least products certified in Europe are more likely to be safe.

Identity Theft Enforcement and Restitution Act

Tech Target reports that HR 5938 has been sent to the president for signature. This bill was actually written to authorize $4 million a year to pay for the protection of VP Cheney after he leaves office, but it also contains provisions of S 2168 related to cyber-crime:

“The key anti-cybercrime provisions that are included in this legislation will close existing gaps in our criminal law to keep up with the cunning and ingenuity of today’s identity thieves,” Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), sponsor of S. 2168, said in a prepared statement.

The legislation gives identity theft victims the ability to seek restitution in federal court for the loss of time and money spent restoring their credit. It also enables federal prosecution of cybercrime not involving interstate or foreign communication, and eliminates the requirement that damage to a computer exceed $5,000 before charges can be brought for unauthorized access to a computer. Leahy said the bill protects innocent people from “frivolous prosecutions” by clarifying that the elimination of the $5,000 threshold only applies to criminal cases.

In addition, the bill tackles the botnet problem by making it a felony to use spyware or keyloggers to damage 10 or more computers, regardless of the total amount of damage caused.

The legislation also makes it a crime to threaten to steal data from a computer. This provision expands current law, which only allows prosecution of criminals who try to extort companies by threatening to shut down or damage a computer.

This is big news for investigators and forensics. It also is probably big news to the Cheney family. Given the odd juxtaposition, it is hard not to compare how much money is earmarked for fighting cyber-crime in America versus paying for Cheney’s personal safety.

$700b bailout transparency

Craig Newmark points out that Americans can actually read the details of the bailout packages:

Want to know what’s in that $700 billion bailout legislation for the mortgage companies? What should be in the legislation? The folks at Sunlight have posted publicmarkup.org both the Administration’s bill and one being offered by Senator Chris Dodd in a way so that you can read and comment on them section by section.

Thanks Craig!