Nuclear Janitor Pleads Guilty to Espionage

Dark Reading reports:

In January 2007, Oakley contacted the French Embassy and consulates in several U.S. cities to determine the country’s interest in purchasing the nuclear data and equipment, according to the plea agreement. The French government contacted the FBI and set up a sting in which an FBI agent posed as a French government agent.

Hard to imagine why he thought they would not just turn him in to the FBI. Perhaps he thought France was an enemy of the US?

The materials Oakley had tried to sell to a foreign government were, in fact, pieces of equipment known as “barrier” and associated hardware items that play a crucial role in the production of highly enriched uranium — a special nuclear material — through the gaseous diffusion process. In his role as a janitor, Oakley was supposed to have broken up the barrier for disposal. But Oakley says he knew the gaseous diffusion process used in the U.S. is better than the methods currently used in France, and he therefore stole four of the barrier tubes and offered to sell them to French agents.

Interesting to note how educated he was about the quality of the barrier, especially with regard to the French. Did he overhear a conversation, read a brief or just figure it out on his own?

Security Nude Scanners for Sale

The Deutsche Welle makes light (pun not intended) of an EU decision to sell unwanted security “Nude Scanners”:

[The German interior minister] Schaeuble’s comments eventually led to the start of laboratory tests in Germany in which scientists began working on potential upgrades to the full-body airport screening devices in the hope they would find a way to produce images that do not show passengers naked.

The EU shelved its plans to introduce the scanners around the bloc in November after several were tested in airports around Europe as part of a trial.

EU parliamentarians will now discuss how the scanners in their possession will be sold — and to whom.

Ideas? Perhaps they can be used at a Berlin nightclub.

Kebabs labeled imminent threat

Bruce posted an interesting note about a “rational” response to peanut allergies today. I agree in theory with his suggestion that people need to move away from fear to find better solutions.

On that note, the BBC describes a similar issue with ‘shocking’ kebabs.

Apparently kebabs in the UK are not only bad for your health, they do not accurately state their ingredients.

Some 35% of labels listed a different meat species than that actually found in the kebab.

Six kebabs were found to include pork when it had not been declared as an ingredient. Two of the six were described as Halal – food or drink permitted for Muslims, which must not contain pork.

Just the words “different meat species” make me not want to eat a kebab ever again. Here is another shocking revelation.

In addition, there was little difference in weight between kebabs labelled as “small” and “large”, [Geoffrey Theobald, of Lacors] added.

“While some people may think they are making sensible choices by ordering a small kebab, this study showed little difference between small and large kebab weight.”

That might be a great thing when measured in simple economic terms, but the health/safety researchers seem to think less is more. They have even labeled some kebabs an “imminent” threat to public health. Will there be a kebab ban? Kebab control?

Maybe regulators should go the opposite direction and assign awards that emphasize kebab quality. That would surely help the folks too drunk at 4am at the Kebab stand. Although they are unable to tell if they are chewing pita or soggy paper wrapper/napkin, they should at least be certain they have purchased a healthy meat species. Wait, are we still talking about rational responses?