The UK Ministry of Defence is trying to get the word out that Russians are increasingly being bombed by Russia.

Such incidents appear to be becoming increasingly common, with [Russian independent Telegram channel] Astra reporting that “at least 21 aerial bombs” had accidentally been dropped by Russian forces on Russian or Russian-occupied territory between March and April 2024.

As you can see below, in just one example from a single Russian bomb, thirty Russian homes with ten cars were destroyed.

To the outside observer these are huge problems with major consequences.

Training failures and fatigue are suggested, although the elephant in the room is an alternate perspective, how the dictator doesn’t care about bombing his own citizens, just like he throws away his troops’ lives. Training and rest don’t fix problems that are never allowed to be seen as problems.

We should have known that the guy who says he doesn’t run a car company, just to avoid being regulated as a car company, can’t actually run a car company.

A single Tesla Cybertruck bolt fastener worked loose, as should be expected, and here is what happened next.

Many of the Cybertrucks just simply die and can’t be started.

Oh, and about that disinformation campaign to say his car company shouldn’t be seen as a car company… suddenly he wants it to be seen as the only car company.

Don’t think of it as a car company, think of it as the only car company. Uh huh. Definitely not more red flags here than a Chinese military parade.

A judge recently exposed the Tesla CEO for this brand of shallow hypocrisy and gaslighting, within context of X Corp’s clumsy strategy to undermine law and order.

The judge found that X Corp’s argument exposed a tension between the platform’s desire to control user data while also enjoying the safe harbor of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which allows X to avoid liability for third-party content. If X owned the data, it could perhaps argue it has exclusive rights to control the data, but then it wouldn’t have safe harbor.

“X Corp. wants it both ways: to keep its safe harbors yet exercise a copyright owner’s right to exclude, wresting fees from those who wish to extract and copy X users’ content,” Alsup wrote.

If X got its way, Alsup warned, “X Corp. would entrench its own private copyright system that rivals, even conflicts with, the actual copyright system enacted by Congress” and “yank into its private domain and hold for sale information open to all, exercising a copyright owner’s right to exclude where it has no such right.”

Replace government protection with a private system to enrich one man?

The X is a swastika.

Nazis always are like this. They are loud-mouthed “absolutists” yet amorphous and undefined. Their exaggerated opposition to others’ law and order — avoiding governance at every turn with whatever is best for them and only them, also known as antiwoke radical individualism — is how they aim to invoke dictatorship.

In the engineering world this anti-science junk theory manifests as designs that never achieve production quality. Definitions with real baselines and standards of care about others’ needs aren’t ever allowed to exist independent of making supreme leader feel good.

The defense strategy of the accused Tesla owner was to blame her Autopilot, which she believed was designed and marketed to her to use as… wait for it… an Autopilot.

How dare she believe Autopilot meant Autopilot? She probably also believed she bought a car from a car company. Doesn’t she know CEO Elon Musk isn’t CEO Elon Musk? When nothing is real, Tesla can never be held accountable for even its most egregious crimes.

Thus, for a very simple reason, no matter how hard she tried to blame her Autopilot for its total failure to be an Autopilot, the Australian court instead swallowed an Elon Musk pill that released a fraudulent and deceptive Tesla from liability despite the clear and present design failures posing mass threat to society.

Agrawal spent two years maintaining her innocence, blaming the crash on Tesla’s autopilot feature and told police Ms Lagos “jumped in front of the car”.

But crash analysis showed Agrawal did not slow down before hitting Ms Lagos and the police investigation revealed just 30 seconds before the incident, autopilot was not turned on.

She didn’t slow down? That’s because she wasn’t paying attention, a tell-tale sign she was simply trusting what Elon Musk repeatedly had told her about her Autopilot. She was greedy, but not nearly as greedy as the true criminal in this story about advanced fee fraud.

Tesla is such a horrible and obvious fraud, that it has millions of drivers as victims utterly convinced of something false just because they paid for it in advance. This woman not only believed lies that Autopilot was a future safety device that would absolve her of risk today, she even believed lies that it was operating into the future when it wasn’t in present (because it disengaged without sufficient warning).

This case reads like a Venn diagram of liars buying from a liar who makes robots that lie.

Tesla should be banned for creating two out three circles that cause injury and death. Yet instead we see how accountability falls outside the vast majority and true causes of risk: Tesla management. The court is ignoring basically all the true causes and instead passively warning people to not buy Tesla, really to not buy Autopilot as an Autopilot, but that’s not going to solve the high threat to society fast enough.

Putting the victims of advanced fee fraud in jail doesn’t get to the heart of the crime, or stop it from spreading to many other victims.

Bottom line, if the driver had bought any other brand of car, she wouldn’t have hit a pedestrian. Without fraud there would be no Tesla.