A legal team has challenged the attempt to market and sell tasers into Northern Ireland, according to the BBC:

Lawyers for the applicant claim there was a failure to carry out a proper equality impact assessment before tasers were brought in.

They also alleged the introduction breached the right to life and right to freedom from torture under the Human Rights Act.

Henry Blaxland, QC, told the High Court the use of Tasers was a matter of real public concern

This makes sense to me. As I have said before in this blog, tasers need to be considered a seriously damaging and life-threatening device, akin to torture. When more deadly force is impractical, a taser might be an option, but electrocution should not be seen as a safe or simple technology (as Edison proved many years ago when he electrified live animals in public to demonstrate the danger).

The next quote really worries me:

However, David McMillen, representing the chief constable, told the court that the weapons purchased were part of a pilot project and only issued to specially-trained officers who can use them in limited circumstances.

That is what was said in America, and soon after practically every officer in every state was carrying a taser with minimal training. The “success” criteria of the pilot should be highly suspect. “Specially-trained” should be carefully documented. Abuse of these devices is rife, and many deaths could have been prevented had police not abused/misused taser technology under the false pretenses like those put forward by Mr. McMillen.

Mr. Typewriter, Martin K. Tytell, has passed away. His work intersected with information security, as explained by the NYT:

Hiss had been convicted largely because the government presented expert testimony maintaining that the documents passed to Chambers were written on a typewriter owned by Hiss and his wife, Priscilla. At his sentencing, Hiss famously accused Chambers of committing “forgery by typewriter.”

Afterward, to prepare for an appeal, Hiss’s lawyers hired Mr. Tytell to build a typewriter whose print pattern would be indistinguishable, flaws and all, from that of the Hisses. It took him nearly two years, but he succeeded. His work became the foundation of Hiss’s plea, ultimately unsuccessful, for a new trial and, after his release from prison in 1954, of the debate over his guilt, which goes on to this day. Hiss died in 1996.

I rarely see his name mentioned today, but hopefully he will continue to be recognized for his amazing gifts and his contributions to our work.

A story in The Boston Globe reveals that a former Intel employee stands charged with theft:

In a criminal complaint unsealed Tuesday, the FBI alleged that Biswahoman Pani of Worcester copied a host of confidential Intel documents, including 13 “top secret” company files containing highly sensitive design plans for future processor chips. In the complaint, filed in late August in US District Court in Boston, FBI Special Agent Timothy Russell of the bureau’s Boston computer crime squad said in an affidavit that more than 100 pages of sensitive Intel documents, as well as 19 computer-aided-design drawings, were found in a search of Pani’s house conducted on July 1.

Strange, but a search for Biswahoman Pani suggests I search for Biswamohan Pani instead. A LinkedIn profile on the latter also shows that the name in the story might be wrong.

Biswamohan Pani
Sr Staff Engineer at AMD
Greater Boston Area

Apparently Biswamohan wanted a transfer within Intel to a location closer to his wife, who also worked for the company. Although Intel agreed to the transfer, the accused gave a two-week notice for his resignation, said he wanted to work in hedge funds, and that he would immediately take vacation. He then took a week to relocate and apparently went to work for a rival the following week.

However, Russell said, unbeknownst to Intel officials, Pani had been discussing a possible job at AMD for several months. He began working for AMD on June 2, eight days before his employment at Intel ended. Pani still had access to his Intel laptop and the company’s computer network. Russell said Pani used this access to collect sensitive documents that might have provided valuable competitive intelligence for his new employer.

Certainly reads as though he was ashamed, afraid or intentionally deceptive about his new role at a rival. Good case example of how to detect insider abuse. As soon as he gave notice the SIEM or log management system should have been tuned to alert on any remote access and download activity from his user account. Instead, the case began when another employee “noticed” Biswamohan had joined AMD.

Anyone else think changes to his public LinkedIn profile were the first clue?

Now comes the really interesting part:

During an interview with the FBI on July 23, Pani admitted to obtaining the files, but said he had done so out of curiosity and to assist his wife in preparing for her new job at the Hudson plant.

Given that his wife still works for Intel, why would he be in any kind of rush to access files that she also could access in the future? The case is more clear if he was copying files she was not authorized to, and less clear if they had the same level of access and legitimate need.

This case reminds me of the recent controversy about a retired engineer who stands accused of selling US military information to China:

…prosecutors say Noshir Gowadia used Maui as a base to design a stealth cruise missile for China. He was indicted on 21 counts of conspiracy, money-laundering and falsifying tax returns.

Despite the seriousness of the charges, the case has received scant public attention.

There too, the question of motive is complicated:

Cheryl Gowadia said he’s honest and, in a way, naive. He didn’t bother calling a lawyer when agents showed up at his home and started questioning him.

“He is totally unable to lie. It is not his nature. He’s as honest and truthful and trusting as they come,” Cheryl Gowadia said.

[…]

The defendant’s son, Ashton Gowadia, said it doesn’t make sense that someone with a distinguished career like his father’s would sell military secrets. He also questioned why anyone living a comfortable life would sell classified material for so little money.

“We want this thing in court,” Ashton Gowadia said. “He wants to show the world that he’s innocent and he wants to clear his name.”

There certainly is a shifting perspective on what constitutes illegal activity, as documented in a story from 2000 when the Clinton administration charged Lockheed for sharing satellite secrets with the Chinese:

The Lockheed Martin Corporation has agreed to pay $13 million to the government to settle a case involving the sale of satellite technology to China in 1994, company and Clinton administration officials said today.

In other words, people looking backward in time with a current set of values might accuse people of all kinds of unconscionable activity. Hindsight is clearly 20-20, but did the accused know they were in violation at the time?