Perhaps by now it has become common knowledge Tesla pay is illegally far below market, work benefits are in dangerous unhealthy decline, and staff are particularly screwed should they dare to invoke basic ethical concerns (e.g. discuss customer or worker safety).

He Died Helping Build Tesla’s Gigafactory. Tesla Didn’t Tell Local Officials.

It’s like reading what a car company would be if Queen Isabella came back from the dead to prove her ruthless deadly Inquisition was a business model.

Torture is so cruel, it is so dehumanizing to both the tortured and the torturer, that it is always wrong, unconditionally. “If torture is evil,” [Ron Gassner] writes, “its efficacy is irrelevant. Those who know it to be evil should reject torture outright, regardless of how efficacious it may or may not be.”

What if Tesla’s work culture is always wrong, unconditionally?

A toxic abuse culture of oppression for profit, as history surely tells us, means we should expect whistleblowers and some big leaks about basic morality failures (e.g. claims about the Queen of Tesla ignoring safety).

The drivers named in the leaks and contacted by the newspaper accused Tesla of brushing off their concerns about its Autopilot technology. It is alleged that employees are given strict guidelines over how to reply to complaints, with some drivers claiming that Tesla workers were urged to avoid written communication to “offer as little attack surface as possible.”

Nobody expects the Tesla Inquisition?

Written communication about customer complaints gives… customers an attack surface?

Customers.

Who is the enemy here?

Perhaps Spain is too obscure a reference. Tesla does burn its customers alive, like in the Inquisition, but we’re talking modern technology.

Did a zombie Nixon come back to become the crazy old man of Tesla?

The files shared with Handlesblatt included details of 2,400 complaints about cars accelerating unexpectedly and 1,500 automatic braking problems – including 139 cases of unintentional emergency braking and 383 “phantom stops”. One customer, who complained about his car “phantom braking”, claimed Tesla showed an “absolute lack of any concern given the seriousness of the security problems”.

That’s like an American citizen saying Nixon had an absolute lack of concern about the seriousness of destroying democracy.

Uh, yeah. Duh.

Allegedly Tesla believes they have perfected a draconian NDA that is so regressive they internally consider it a legal sledgehammer that criminalizes any and all speech they don’t like regardless of safety.

The company said a former employee had “misused his access as a service technician to exfiltrate information in violation of his signed non-disclosure agreement, Tesla’s data management policies…”.

Let me guess, the data management policy says if any data involves customer safety concerns it must not be retained.

It does seem like they learned the exact wrong lessons from Nixon.

“Well, the hell with Dean,” Nixon told Haldeman that Monday morning in the Oval Office. “Frankly, I don’t want to have in the record discussions we’ve had in this room on Watergate.” In another conversation later in the day, the president agreed with Haldeman that they ought to “get rid” of the recordings.

But seriously, while trying to cancel the voice of its customers, Tesla has very sloppily leaked things they probably wish they had deleted.

The files include tables containing more than 100,000 names of former and current employees, including the social security number of Tesla CEO Musk, along with private email addresses, phone numbers, salaries of employees, bank details of customers and secret details from production, Handelsblatt reported. The breach would violate the GDPR, it said. If such a violation was proved, Tesla could be fined up to 4 percent of its annual sales, which could be 3.26 billion euros.

If you ask me how Germany was tricked by Tesla’s CEO to open a clearly horrible and degenerative factory riddled with ethical lapses, I’d say read the related American history.

…manipulative, master politician overseeing every detail: approving a “shakedown”… for donations, fixing the price…, orchestrating “dirty tricks” against opponents, thanking the donor of hush money….

Very modern stuff. Still reminds me of 1470s Spain. I don’t think any German politicians have been burned alive… yet.

The bottom line is there should be an outright ban (e.g. Speak Out Act) on Tesla’s obvious abuse of any NDA in automotive safety disputes.

Tesla has a long history of trying to cover up customer complaints about safety problems. As far back as 2016, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration had to announce that customers were allowed to publicize safety issues after reports that Tesla was requiring customers to sign nondisclosure agreements to qualify for warranty repairs on problematic Model S suspensions systems.

That brings forward the question of whether Tesla should also be investigated for suspicious NDA language used to fill its German factory with the “chaos” of easily manipulated and abused foreign workers who have no clue about safety or rights violations.

When Gregor Lesnik left his pregnant girlfriend in Slovenia for a job [far away in another country], his visa application described specialized skills and said he was a supervisor headed to a [completely different] auto plant.

Turns out, that wasn’t true.

The unemployed electrician had no qualifications to oversee… workers and spoke only a sentence or two of [the required foreign language]. He never set foot in [the facility that was written into his papers, a direct competitor to Tesla, to defraud the government]. The companies that arranged his questionable visa instead sent Lesnik to a menial job…. He earned the equivalent of $5 an hour to expand the plant for… Tesla.

Lesnik’s three-month tenure ended a year ago in a serious injury and a lawsuit that has exposed a troubling practice… [of Tesla lying to everyone about everything while censoring others].

That’s just a hint of what could be ahead for any journalist brave enough to interview silenced Tesla factory workers in Germany… as predicted by a 2016 report that didn’t get nearly enough attention.

The part where they report Tesla had lawyers take desperate unskilled Eastern Europeans to apply for visas for work at a BMW factory, and then under strict NDA illegally redirected them into Tesla factory jobs with no qualification or safety… it’s so evil, you can’t make this stuff up.

Think about it. If their NDA-based visa fraud gets investigated, Tesla planted false flags to misdirect authorities for its competitors to get in trouble. That’s a very 1980s South African way of undermining government while wrecking markets too.

Tesla reminds me of when Ford was excitedly pushing politicians to increase production of its cars in Germany using slave labor from Eastern Europe. Who else remembers?

Right Germany?

I mean, right? Extreme right?

Did you Nazi this coming?

There’s a note in 2018 about how Steve Bannon’s guidance for the GOP was to take a topic and “flood it with shit“.

Although no connection to history was made at that time, just a year earlier an obvious explanation for his strategy was sitting ripe and ready for anyone to pick it up. He had worked in Hollywood on a film “very much like Soviet propaganda”.

Julia Jones, who worked as Bannon’s screenwriting partner for a decade… described how Bannon admired the documentary films made by the Nazi propagandist Leni Riefenstahl, such as “Triumph of the Will”: “Her playbook was key for him. I think he used her technique of fear, which you can see in that movie [In the Face of Evil, released by Bannon in 2004].”

Budget? $500,000 (estimated). Gross sales US & Canada? $110,577. Bannon had written this movie glorifying Reagan’s biogtry under the premise of “racists enable racists…turns of phrase and tropes are daggers.”

By 2015 Bannon had transitioned from such propagandist attempts within Hollywood to become chairman of political extremist Breitbart News, clearly motivated to “flood it with shit”. A year later in 2016 he was hired to be CEO overseeing disinformation tactics in a GOP campaign for President.

Why had Bannon become so enamored of Nazis that he helped one run for President? Why did he love propaganda methods to destroy truth and replace it with fear, generating false fascist narratives about “strong white men” as saviors?

Arguably it goes back to his role as a low-level budget planner in the U.S. Navy and, while deployed at sea, being heavily imbibed on baseless fears about the Iranian hostage crisis.

Ronald Reagan worked covertly to block American attempts to free their hostages in Iran, as a means to win the Presidency.

Bannon worshiped Reagan and saw such “means to win” as perfectly fine. It is exactly why Bannon two decades later planned in 2007 to make a completely fabricated propaganda hit piece about Jews and Muslims, calling them a threat to the Nixon/Reagan vision of America run only by white men.

Early symptoms of his fear-addled power-thirst showed up in around 1995 during a bitter lawsuit:

What sunk Bannon was, he lied…

And then in 1996 he was…

…charged with spousal abuse, simple battery, and dissuading a witness, because he had made it impossible for his wife to talk to the police.

And then 1997:

He claimed that he would sue the school if they accepted our children… the biggest problem he had with [school] is the number of Jews that attend. He said he doesn’t like Jews…

Clearly over the years he has been repeatedly accused of using horrible, ginned-up hate tactics in order to get whatever he wanted.

It’s an interesting fact that Bannon spun from being a scared bean-counter in the bowels of the Navy to go work in Hollywood, in Goldman Sachs and ultimately get rich only because of a lottery ticket — some early papers he signed on the sitcom Seinfeld.

…Bannon’s legitimation of a white nationalism that hates Jews but admires Israel has forced a reckoning with the single-minded meaning of the “new anti-Semitism”…

His “new anti-Semitism” would thus be the more classic variety, riding the backs of Jews while subtly trying to blame them for any and all failures, as if an almost exact repeat of the Nazi propaganda machine created by Riefenstahl to manipulate fear, in order to hide a fascist fraud-to-riches platform.

Bannon, Brian Kolfage, Andrew Badolato and Timothy Shea defrauded hundreds of thousands of donors in connection with the “We Build the Wall” campaign [based on false xenophobic fear mongering], which raised $25m (£19m), the Department of Justice (DoJ) said. Bannon received more than $1m, at least some of which he used to cover personal expenses, the DoJ said.

In the “pitbull without lipstick” world of the GOP the Bannon pedigree of pushing hateful lies served to navigate them into the morass they operate today. They seem not to mind at all taking his lead as their own, while leaving “Sloppy Bannon” behind and stuck into charges of conspiracy to commit wire fraud and conspiracy to commit money laundering, not to mention contempt of democracy.

And one final thought, Hollywood became what it is today because all the movie-making talent fled from Berlin, Germany in the 1930s.

From the time Adolf Hitler became Germany’s chancellor in 1933 to the opening salvos of World War II in 1939, about 800 actors, directors, writers, composers and producers fled Europe for the safety of America. The Third Reich’s loss was Hollywood’s gain as the infusion of artistic talent changed moviemaking for decades to come.

Seems sadly predictable that men like Bannon hate others for surviving and thriving like this. How dare Hollywood be so diverse, skilled and enjoy success, proving every day that Hitler failed? Bannon’s toxic competitive thirst based on fears means he fixates on easy profits and hates freedoms; but he stands out as especially easy to explain, given his overt attraction to Nazi propaganda methods intended to defraud the public and steal power… especially from “liberals” who *gasp* believe in collaboration.

The CEO of Twitter recently has been running a heavy handed PR campaign spreading hate speech to make American cities look bad.

His lawyers, in a truly bizarre twist of logic, now want Tesla customers to stop paying for their cars if they live in a city (they dislike for any reason, or no reason at all).

…lawyer Alex Spiro reportedly “loudly opined that it was unreasonable… to pay… since San Francisco was a s— hole,” and Musk himself said “he would only pay… over his dead body.”

Imagine the mind of a person who says they will only pay if they’re dead.

Clearly a genius at work there, since Tesla software reportedly is designed to kill new owners almost immediately after buying the car.

But now there’s a loophole that every dead Tesla owner will want in their will. Plot twist!

The big fancy lawyers of Tesla have clearly announced nobody should pay for things, anything, when they live in a city.

Did you hear that Tesla owners? Move to a city and you don’t have to pay for your car, even when it kills you before you kill others!

Something tells me people living in a city are too modest to want to own a s- hole Tesla that tries to kill you and everyone around you. They don’t really even want to own cars. Even a free early death is still early death, if you see the problem.

Perhaps that’s the real story here.

Tesla rapidly is losing market share and cities are no exception (as residents read about suburban owners being burned alive, their houses destroyed, by design flaws). The CEO is using his Digital Dearborn Independent as a vehicle to unleash tired hate speech without fear it will impact sales.

Or even more to the point, he doesn’t care about sales. He cares about attention. Political attention.

In fact, the less Tesla sells (repeat customers hard to find if they keep dying abruptly), the more hate speech Twitter will foment as their new business model or even political platform.

Don’t need to sell cars if the business shifts to a 1930s sentiment of trying to get paid to monopolize violence… like how GOP politician Kris Kobach wrote his Harvard thesis promoting South African Apartheid as a great business model for white men.

Has Twitter hired Tucker “it’s the birth rates” Carlson yet to promote racist talking points? Or has he been burned to death already after someone put him in a Tesla? So much death, so little news about who and why.

Come to think of it, Tesla’s CEO loudly complaining with Carlson that Hitler was right and women should be forced into birthing, while he is selling cars that seriously decline the population… seems very much the warning nobody should overlook.

From the 1920s through the 1980s a major talking point of white nationalists (e.g. Prime Minister Hertzog) in South Africa was population decline (e.g. “replacement theory” or “swamping”) despite the country at the time experiencing a population surge.

Guess who has two thumbs, whines constantly about bogus population decline theory, and originally is from 1980s South Africa? The Tesla CEO telling Twitter lawyers dumb things to say. His antics seem more and more out of date the more he talks, just like an old “verlig-verkrampstryd“.

ChatGPT, given your weirdly close relationship with Tesla money based on withheld payments, what do you think?

A Tesla has been in a crash with a F-150, leaving the Tesla owner dead. It quietly revealed yet again that the “Autopilot crap” is really, and always will be, crap.

One of the shocking things in April 2016 was that a man who clearly knew nothing about cars positioned a deceptively named non-working “Autopilot” as already achieving collision avoidance.

An entirely avoidable near-miss incident video shared by Josh Brown was unapologetically spun into a dangerously misleading Twitter PR campaign (disinformation, which killed Brown himself only weeks later while believing the CEO’s suggestion collisions would be avoided).

As you probably know by now that his unnecessary death (and the Tesla CEO response that radar would be added to cars to prevent any more deaths, a statement he then reversed to increase margins on sales), sparked a series of talks by me over the subsequent years about the fraud (and gaslighting).

I hoped to raise awareness from a safety engineering perspective. Tesla seemed to be run by someone detached from reality, uncaring about human life, which would kill more people than ever.

While my warnings about this have been accurate, I’m still not sure the right people are getting the blazingly loud tesladeaths.com message yet.

I suppose it was easy for me to predict Tesla’s early “safest car” claims as fraud. That is because I look deeply into the data, look deeply into the technology, and… let’s be honest, this isn’t rocket science.

It’s actually pretty easy stuff for anyone to see. Just take a little time to read, know how to drive a car, and don’t believe hype from a man who gets enraged whenever his name isn’t mentioned in news about Tesla.

Here’s the latest problem, after it quietly leaked out of Corona police reports. The initial safety bulletin was sparsely written:

On March 28, 2023, at 10:16 P.M., the Corona Police Department responded to a traffic collision at the intersection of Foothill Parkway and Rimpau Avenue. Upon arrival, officers discovered that a Ford F-150 truck had entered the intersection against a red light and collided with a Tesla. The driver of the Tesla, a 43- year-old male resident of Corona, succumbed to his injuries at the scene…

Red light crash? That is one of my core areas of control failure research that I have spoken out about for years — like talking about firewall rule bypass, which should make any SOC analyst’s ears burn.

To me the report reads like a Tesla in 2023 did not avoid a collision, despite such promised capability. That is a very big clue for predicting more crashes, worth investigating further (e.g. the entire basis of my presentations/predictions for the past seven years).

After months of watching and waiting on Corona, California for more details, nothing came (unlike in a Colorado investigation of killer robots, for comparison). We haven’t heard from police, for example, whether the CEO-driven Tesla fraud campaign is in trouble for his role in this crash. Could his buggy, oversold software have done a better job here than the human… at the thing he repeatedly promises: collision avoidance?

Fortunately the NHTSA now has a Standing General Order (SGO) on Crash Reporting that can be easily correlated by researchers with these dry police reports. More to the point, the SGO helps us assess future dangers of various driver “assistance” entities.

Entities named in the General Order must report a crash if Level 2 ADAS was in use at any time within 30 seconds of the crash and the crash involves a vulnerable road user or results in a fatality, a vehicle tow-away, an air bag deployment, or any individual being transported to a hospital for medical treatment.

That 30 seconds reference is because Tesla tried to cheat by disabling their technology at the very last second so they could falsely blame humans for computer failures.

Tesla seems to be blaming drivers despite, at least in these sixteen high-profile emergency vehicle crashes—in which Teslas rammed into stopped emergency vehicles alongside roadways or in active lanes, incidents NHTSA found on average would have been identifiable by a human up to 8 seconds ahead of time—Autopilot was running but then shut off just a second before the impact.

Super evil stuff.

It’s hard for me to believe people still buy this brand after its founder was pushed out for being concerned about safety. Let me say that again, Tesla management appears to be intentionally cooking data to avoid accountability when their product failed.

You can not trust anything Tesla says about Tesla logs. Assume they are the Enron of automobile data.

What they do is far, far worse stuff than VW “dieselgate” since people are literally dying from their coverups.

At this point NHTSA might as well call out a Tesla Order, given the obvious sore thumb among all the other carmakers.

Is it volume? Nope.

Nissan claims nearly 600,000 vehicles operating its Level 2 ADAS “ProPilot Assist” yet it looks like it reported only two crashes, to put it another way. Volvo similarly has a high volume of cars, which shows up as just one crash.

Tesla has design flaws causing a crash frequency that puts it in a zone all its own, at over 700 and rapidly increasing. The more people use their products the more people die or are harmed, unlike any other car.

Garbage engineering rushed to market puts it mildly, made worse by a CEO who fraudulently promotes low quality software as if it’s magic fairy dust. His decision recently to personally screen every single Tesla employee for loyalty to him (e.g. the infamous moral dilemma of a Hitler Oath, for those who know history) indicates he is becoming desperate to hide failure.

[Creating a fear and harm culture where staff] excuse themselves from any personal responsibility for the unspeakable crimes which they carried out on the orders of the Supreme Commander whose true nature they had seen for themselves. […] Later and often, by honoring their oath they dishonored themselves as human beings and trod in the mud the moral code…

It is a grave mistake (pun not intended) to take any job at Tesla, as German autoworkers surely know well. Their country, unlike America, requires them to study the anti-Semites who caused the Holocaust and how they took over media to spread hate.

Anyway, back to this tragic Corona crash reported in April to NHTSA, a Tesla owner clearly didn’t get the memo about Tesla safety failures and disinformation as his car drove towards the wide open Rimpau and Foothill intersection.

So here are the SGO details just released, which show the destroyed Tesla was brand new and traveling at only 47mph… like entirely new just on the road for the first time at 10PM (Dark – Lighted) and conclusively relying on ADAS.

• Model Year: 2023
• Mileage: 590
• Date: March 2023
• Time: 05:15 (10:15 PM local time)
• Posted Speed Limit: 45
• Precrash Speed: 47

That 590 mile odometer really grabbed me. It sounds like very compelling proof that Tesla safety claims, like their customers, are dead. And the speed was below 50mph, which in a wide open intersection should have significantly lessened stopping distance, reaction time and thus risk of harm.

It’s worth further research to understand why the newest Tesla ADAS at moderate speed, the most recent and theoretically improved product, again didn’t avoid a fatal crash. Given how it has been advertised as collision avoidance supposedly improving over time, the advertising isn’t even close to product ability.

The data even suggests an older Tesla could be less likely to fatally crash than any new one (e.g. Mobileye and NVidia supplied Tesla superior engineering, yet both walked away over serious ethics concerns).

Tesla technology and management of risk to society seems to be only getting worse, crashing in ways that weren’t a problem five or more years ago.

We see far too many brand new Tesla crash almost immediately like this, for example, straight from factory to junkyard as if they are headed towards being least safest thing on the road. The CEO talks about his product like it will improve, yet it declines, as real world experiences suggests he is selling little more than overpriced coffins.

On a related note, the top five recent ADAS fatalities by speed (MPH) were all… Teslas flagrantly ignoring road signs and failing to avoid collisions.

1. Posted Speed: 55; Precrash: 97 into another car
2. Posted Speed: 45; Precrash: 97 into motorcycle
3. Posted Speed: 55; Precrash: 96 into fixed object
4. Posted Speed: 65; Precrash: 96 into fixed object
5. Posted Speed: 55; Precrash: 90 into another car

How “auto” can any “pilot” ever be, given it clocks in over 700 catastrophic errors such as these?

Would any actual pilot, human or not, be allowed to pilot for even one more minute given fatal crashes into things at this frequent pace? The fact that software can be used to kill and then kill again, and again hundreds of times, is truly diabolical.

And it is a strange twist to history, albeit a repeat, that a Ford just destroyed what arguably is a fascist machine.

Is it a moral act to destroy or disable Tesla before its unsafe ADAS will predictably crash at high speed into innocent people?

Did the F-150 save lives by taking this Tesla off the road? Who in your neighborhood is equipped and prepared to stop what could be seen as a VBED edition of the poorly-engineered Nazi V1? Floridians, looking at you.

Florida Passes Bill to Protect Billionaires if Their Exploding Rockets Kill People

That’s a “lives don’t matter” bill, rooted in pre-Civil War thinking.

After years of Tesla deaths rapidly increasing, the real elephant in the room is… what if Tesla in fact intends to automate organized racist violent criminal acts like when Henry Ford had encouraged and helped Adolf Hitler?

What if Tesla conspires with large foreign financial backers to facilitate automated deaths for profit every minute it is “free” to apocalyptically continue “learning”; a model setup to get away with more harms to Americans?

Perhaps driving a F-150 has just taken on a whole new meaning.