AU Tesla Owner Jailed After She Claimed Her Autopilot Hit Pedestrian

The defense strategy of the accused Tesla owner was to blame her Autopilot, which she believed was designed and marketed to her to use as… wait for it… an Autopilot.

How dare she believe Autopilot meant Autopilot? She probably also believed she bought a car from a car company. Doesn’t she know CEO Elon Musk isn’t CEO Elon Musk? When nothing is real, Tesla can never be held accountable for even its most egregious crimes.

Thus, for a very simple reason, no matter how hard she tried to blame her Autopilot for its total failure to be an Autopilot, the Australian court instead swallowed an Elon Musk pill that released a fraudulent and deceptive Tesla from liability despite the clear and present design failures posing mass threat to society.

Agrawal spent two years maintaining her innocence, blaming the crash on Tesla’s autopilot feature and told police Ms Lagos “jumped in front of the car”.

But crash analysis showed Agrawal did not slow down before hitting Ms Lagos and the police investigation revealed just 30 seconds before the incident, autopilot was not turned on.

She didn’t slow down? That’s because she wasn’t paying attention, a tell-tale sign she was simply trusting what Elon Musk repeatedly had told her about her Autopilot. She was greedy, but not nearly as greedy as the true criminal in this story about advanced fee fraud.

Tesla is such a horrible and obvious fraud, that it has millions of drivers as victims utterly convinced of something false just because they paid for it in advance. This woman not only believed lies that Autopilot was a future safety device that would absolve her of risk today, she even believed lies that it was operating into the future when it wasn’t in present (because it disengaged without sufficient warning).

This case reads like a Venn diagram of liars buying from a liar who makes robots that lie.

Tesla should be banned for creating two out three circles that cause injury and death. Yet instead we see how accountability falls outside the vast majority and true causes of risk: Tesla management. The court is ignoring basically all the true causes and instead passively warning people to not buy Tesla, really to not buy Autopilot as an Autopilot, but that’s not going to solve the high threat to society fast enough.

Putting the victims of advanced fee fraud in jail doesn’t get to the heart of the crime, or stop it from spreading to many other victims.

Bottom line, if the driver had bought any other brand of car, she wouldn’t have hit a pedestrian. Without fraud there would be no Tesla.

CA Tesla Kills One in “Veered” Crash Off a Cliff

A few days ago a Chinese family searched for answers from Tesla to understand why a brand new model would suddenly veer off a cliff at high speed to kill their loved ones.

Today a similar story is in the California news.

A motorist died Tuesday after a Tesla plunged hundreds of feet down an embankment on Highway 50 in Northern California’s high Sierra, according to the California Highway Patrol. Officers were alerted to the incident just before 11:30 a.m. in which the vehicle veered off westbound lanes near a Chevron gas station several miles east of Pollock Pines near the Fresh Pond community, according to the CHP’s dispatch log. Officer Andrew Brown, a spokesman for the CHP’s Placerville office, said he didn’t immediately know what led to the Tesla crash; it was unclear if the Tesla collided with any other vehicles.

With so many cases of “veered” Tesla crashes like this, probability is high that presence of any other vehicle would have meant more tragedy. Only the Tesla driver was found harmed, nearly 400 feet down from a cliff edge.

Neuralink Co-Founder Quits, Warns of Safety Failures Such as Brain Damage

Nothing to see here, just a co-founder warning loudly of torture and brain damage risks from a company’s attempts to implant sensors.

One of the co-founders of Neuralink, Benjamin Rapoport, has departed from the Elon Musk-led brain-computer interface company due to safety concerns. […] The company relies on implanting tiny electrodes to collect data, a method Rapoport views as potentially harmful due to the risk of brain damage.

Context from history may be useful to understand the stakes, when considering a device that can prevent confidentiality and integrity of the mind.

South African Apartheid was famously destroyed by thoughts of freedom from oppression, the secret hopes and dreams of people who would defeat the Musk family dynasty (overcome tools of oppression, technology used to maintain racist power and wealth). Operation Vula by the ANC (which kept even the thoughts of Nelson Mandela safe while in jail) was thus one of the most successful anti-surveillance, anti-Musk stories in history.

Elon Musk, who fled the fall of his family’s Apartheid state in 1988 to become an illegal immigrant in America, seemingly wants to torture and implant hacked sensors into brains to rush the return of a racist dictatorship.

Stephen Bantu Biko was an anti-apartheid activist in South Africa in the 1960s and 1970s. A student leader, he later founded the Black Consciousness Movement which would empower and mobilize much of the urban black population. He was tortured to death by police as they tried to extract secrets from him.

Tesla FSD V.12.3.6 Attempts to Crash Head-On Into Police Car

A swastika (formally known as Twitter) user named @FixorFkit has posted a video of themselves in a Tesla nearly crashing head-on into a police car.

Crossing over double yellow at high speed with a blind curve into the path of an oncoming police car? The driver (swearing and swerving) seems perhaps shaken most by the idea that police would pull him over and hold a Tesla owner accountable.

The commentary posted on swastika also is chilling, not least of all because it ends with some unhinged cult-like mysticism.

#Tesla vs. Police 🥊 (FSD V12.3.6 FAIL – AutoPilot trying to pass a cyclist, instead FSD aims at a cop head on 💥 🤦🏼‍♂️) – (Filmed 5/3/24)

One of the most horrific drives I had with FSD yet! Tesla #AutoPilot tries passing a cyclist, would’ve been a head-on collision with a police officer. Important to be alert w/FSD. I took over and pulled us back to safety!

@elonmusk needs to fix this sh*t before August 2024 #robotaxi / CyberCab announcement. I believe in you Elon!

Believe? This is suicide.

So today we are supposed to be impressed that Tesla FSD is just neural nets learning on their own and that magically makes people safe? Ok, for those unfamiliar with history, here’s a harsh yet fair depiction of what non-technical swastika-loving suicidal cult believers usually have to come to terms with.

Their mysticism doesn’t end well. It’s May 8th today, still known as a holiday in France (as well as Berlin) because Victory in Europe Day. It was supposed to be the official end of Hitler believers.

Source: defense.gov

Tesla FSD is in fact going to be worse than this history, however, because remotely controlled robots’ suicidal tendencies behave more like kamikaze VBIED prowling public streets to kill others, rather than disinformation-addled nutjobs hiding underground pointing a pistol only at their own head.

How many innocent people must die before Tesla is banned?